UK rejoining EASA

[212man]

Good news!

[connoisseur]

April Fool….

[DuncanDoenitz]

Months to extricate ourselves, and rejoin with "immediate effect". Its a no-brainer. On so many levels.

[jimf671]

Good try.

[Bravo73]

If only...

[paco]

Difficult that, with the ECJ in the way.

[Torquetalk]

Originally Posted by paco

Difficult that, with the ECJ in the way.

Is the ECJ lobbying to stop the UK agreeing common standards and reciprocal recognition of qualifications?

[paco]

No, the reason why we couldn't stay with EASA on Brexit is because it is under their bailiwick.

[42psi]

Originally Posted by paco

No, the reason why we couldn't stay with EASA on Brexit is because it is under their bailiwick.

Sadly it's so simple and the perfect example of the intelligence capacity of the political grouping behind the drive for Brexit.

It has the word European in the title.

Remember even the CAA were telling us we wouldn't be leaving EASA, until we were.

[TURIN]

I still have a letter from the MOT via my MP stating we would not be leaving EASA. 🙄

[Torquetalk]

Originally Posted by paco

No, the reason why we couldn't stay with EASA on Brexit is because it is under their bailiwick.

Now I am getting more confused. Are you saying that the the EU told the UK that it could not stay in EASA?

This thread began as a joke by 212man. But if you are privy to real reasons why we have had to endure the administrative, personal and professional cost that has resulted, without being cryptic, please share.

[ShyTorque]

I’m still trying to come to terms with JAR….

[TURIN]

Originally Posted by Torquetalk

Now I am getting more confused. Are you saying that the the EU told the UK that it could not stay in EASA?

This thread began as a joke by 212man. But if you are privy to real reasons why we have had to endure the administrative, personal and professional cost that has resulted, without being cryptic, please share.

EASA is enforced by the ECJ. The EU were very happy for us to remain within EASA but the ERG etc wanted to 'take back control' and insisted that the UK's sovereignty was paramount. Ergo no UK regulations could be over ruled by the ECJ. Result, hard Brexit.

[pax britanica]

1. If we now do everything ourselves of this nature how many more civil servants have we had to employ on transport, food, shipping, technology transfer etc etc etc because of the B word

Of course most ERG members live in the 18th Century so have no clue about the real world -shouldn't they and BJ face some sort of punishment for their evil deeds now the whole thing has turned out to be a complete farce.

[hargreaves99]

Basically the CAA didn't fight hard enough for us to stay in EASA.

CAA, DVLA, Passport office, HMRC, etc all fking useless

[paco]

To be fair to them, they didn't know either.

[Abrahn]

Originally Posted by TURIN

EASA is enforced by the ECJ. The EU were very happy for us to remain within EASA but the ERG etc wanted to 'take back control' and insisted that the UK's sovereignty was paramount. Ergo no UK regulations could be over ruled by the ECJ. Result, hard Brexit.

So does that mean you can do a EASA licence in Northern Ireland (where the ECJ still has jurisdiction)? ;-)

[md 600 driver]

I believe you can do a licence in the gb if the ATO has easa permission

[handysnaks]

Basically the CAA didn't fight hard enough for us to stay in EASA.

CAA, DVLA, Passport office, HMRC, etc all fking useless

Well, it’s a take I suppose.

[212man]

Originally Posted by md 600 driver

I believe you can do a licence in the gb if the ATO has easa permission

https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/136195/en