Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

BK 117 Down draft

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

BK 117 Down draft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jul 2017, 00:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: to far from home
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BK 117 Down draft

Hello

Does anyone have the wind downdraft velocity approximate figures while working under a BK117 up to about 10 metres.
I understand it depends on the weight and conditions, let's say near max all up weight and calm conditions.
chopmoo is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 15:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,459
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Not seen.

ICAR Air Commission was seeking out information about this for a range of aircraft types a few years ago in relation to the dangers of winchmen and mountain rescuers working under aircraft in challenging locations. Very little was available.
jimf671 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 15:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
As a rough rule of thumb, if you know what the rate of descent is at best speed in autorotation, it is a pretty good indicator of the downwash speed in the OGE hover. Not exact or mathematical but pretty good as a ballpark figure.

For example 2000'/min equates to just under 20 kts.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 17:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 919
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts




Flying Bull is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2017, 18:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haven't done it with a BK but holding a handheld anemometer under a hovering AS350 at MAUW gave 50kts, the BK would be more.
Definatly more than 20kts.
fadecdegraded is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2017, 05:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Note that it is OGE hover so some distance below the disc - not the same as standing directly under it in a low hover.

It is useful in assessing proximity to VRS since, if you know your downwash speed you know where the likely critical RoD is.

If you know a better way then post it.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2017, 08:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Zealand
Age: 52
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The BK has probably be the worst downwash among light and medium helicopters that i have seen. Having followed behind most types on fire operations, the worst machine with a short line on is by far the BK. You need at least a 100' line on a BK, whereas a 206, 500, 350, 204 or 205 can happily work on a 50' without stirring the fire up too much.
SuperF is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2017, 08:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: australia
Age: 60
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Note that it is OGE hover so some distance below the disc - not the same as standing directly under it in a low hover.

It is useful in assessing proximity to VRS since, if you know your downwash speed you know where the likely critical RoD is.

If you know a better way then post it.
I don't know a better way, but I do know from looking down from 10 meters it's a hell of a lot more than that
rottenjohn is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2017, 09:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Worldwide
Age: 72
Posts: 118
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Formula 1 (not)

Try this link

Calculating Rotor Downwash Velocity - Rotor & Wing International

thechopper is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2017, 14:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is a very detailed FAA document with lots of data. It is "Rotorwash Analysis Handbook" FAA AD A283 719:

http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc...c=GetTRDoc.pdf
NickLappos is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2017, 16:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
I don't know a better way, but I do know from looking down from 10 meters it's a hell of a lot more than that
perhaps you could use the condition of the water beneath you and relate it to the Beaufort scale.

Most helos produce something that would equate to a Moderate sea state - that is equivalent to a Force 5 or 19 - 24 Kts

To get to 50 Kts you are talking Storm Force 10 which would give Sea state 8 - if you have ever been out in those conditions at sea, you will know that is not what exists under a hovering helicopter.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 02:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
perhaps you could use the condition of the water beneath you and relate it to the Beaufort scale.

Most helos produce something that would equate to a Moderate sea state - that is equivalent to a Force 5 or 19 - 24 Kts

To get to 50 Kts you are talking Storm Force 10 which would give Sea state 8 - if you have ever been out in those conditions at sea, you will know that is not what exists under a hovering helicopter.
Well it was 50kts the day I did it with the handheld wind meter and yes I have spent a lot of time at sea and if you enlarge that wind to make it comparable to the size of the sea it would be force 10.
Lots of ifs and scenarios in your posts crab but if you don't know something it's ok, no single person knows everything and it's ok to say I don't know especially if you actually don't.
Or just say nothing or in this case post nothing rather than say what someone else has actually done is wrong or lies or whatever you meant.
fadecdegraded is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 09:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
A very emotional post fadecdegraded - you seem to be suffering from the modern syndrome that one either has to be right or wrong about everything and just making a suggestion or discussing options or opinions isn't acceptable.

I have suggested answers to the OPs question - whether they are right, wrong or somewhere inbetween isn't for me to say - some of the graphs in Nick's linked document seem to suggest variations between 20 and 50 kts for a CH 53 but there is a lot of data in there and I don't have the time or inclination to digest it.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 10:34
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 608
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
I measured these numbers... but it's on hoist position, in 5 meter increments:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/zj5bdxv9mu...nwash.jpg?dl=0
Phoinix is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2017, 14:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,317
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
So the peak value is 14.8 m/s or 28 Kts
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2017, 15:03
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NL

the bit about the harley-davidson vs the S76 (at about p249) looked like valuable research into this "complex issue"
AnFI is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2017, 18:13
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 898
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Not strictly the same issue but, nevertheless, good visuals based upon actual data:

JimL is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2017, 22:02
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Netherlands
Age: 54
Posts: 3,185
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by JimL
Not strictly the same issue but, nevertheless, good visuals based upon actual data:

Thanks very good video

SLB
Self loading bear is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.