Firehawk Trials in Oz 2016/17 fires season
Wasn't really a trial at all. Timberline helicopters operated their UH60 on CWN operations under a discreet AOC via Pays. I think they got picked up for some work and the client was happy.
Would their performance in Oz be any different than that of their work in the USA for the USFS and State Agencies?
Choose the right airframe/equipment combination for the need and Bob's your Uncle.
Chinooks, Skycranes, Hueys, 212's, 412's, 61's, even Jet Rangers or MD-500's....pick the right tool from the box.
Choose the right airframe/equipment combination for the need and Bob's your Uncle.
Chinooks, Skycranes, Hueys, 212's, 412's, 61's, even Jet Rangers or MD-500's....pick the right tool from the box.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Early feedback from January: Timberline Blackhawk arrives for Australian summer
I/C
Some stats for the first fire the Blackhawk worked at – The Mulligan Flat Fire – With Bucket on transiting at 110knots, 34nm in 18 mins and spent 3 hours on the fireground delivering 65 buckets @ 3,400 litres for a total of 221,000 litres.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are still restricted category, so no better than a K-Max or a 214 or any other restricted machine in my opinion ,maybe a tad faster but still can't carry Pax or winch crew. I'd love to see it work to be able to carry crew as it would be hands down a fantastic machine if we're unrestricted, but I think it will be a long haul given US and Aus restrictions on military types.
They are still restricted category, so no better than a K-Max or a 214 or any other restricted machine in my opinion ,maybe a tad faster but still can't carry Pax or winch crew. I'd love to see it work to be able to carry crew as it would be hands down a fantastic machine if we're unrestricted, but I think it will be a long haul given US and Aus restrictions on military types.
They are still restricted category, so no better than a K-Max or a 214 or any other restricted machine in my opinion ,maybe a tad faster but still can't carry Pax or winch crew. I'd love to see it work to be able to carry crew as it would be hands down a fantastic machine if we're unrestricted, but I think it will be a long haul given US and Aus restrictions on military types.
I don't think that at the moment ITAR are allowing end user certificates to foreign companies/entities for used UH60's, so it may well be a race to for which ever Aussie companies ink operating deals with US operators on discreet AOC's.
Also food for thought are all the Billings and Colombia CH47's that are ousting all the S64's on the fire front, especially now that a reliable tank has been built and tested.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are still restricted category, so no better than a K-Max or a 214 or any other restricted machine in my opinion ,maybe a tad faster but still can't carry Pax or winch crew. I'd love to see it work to be able to carry crew as it would be hands down a fantastic machine if we're unrestricted, but I think it will be a long haul given US and Aus restrictions on military types.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tried to say something BUT its Gone into space... So will try again.
Those numbers seem a bit fishy to me... 180 mins 65 buckets.
Thats 2.8 mins round trip ( to and from the fire) ! thats 1.4 mins each way WITHOUT taking into account slowing down and transition to pick up water and back to flight then dump the water and go again! If that was the case on that fire the water must of been beside the fire! NOT too many fires with the luxury of water right beside the fire that I have been on!
Butni might do the numbers next time i ever get water that close to the fire, and work out the cost per litre involved.
Accountants can make numbers talk BUT each job has its own problems, Trees around the wat point, windy escarpments, wires etc!
Those numbers seem a bit fishy to me... 180 mins 65 buckets.
Thats 2.8 mins round trip ( to and from the fire) ! thats 1.4 mins each way WITHOUT taking into account slowing down and transition to pick up water and back to flight then dump the water and go again! If that was the case on that fire the water must of been beside the fire! NOT too many fires with the luxury of water right beside the fire that I have been on!
Butni might do the numbers next time i ever get water that close to the fire, and work out the cost per litre involved.
Accountants can make numbers talk BUT each job has its own problems, Trees around the wat point, windy escarpments, wires etc!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems there's some more Hawks planned for Aus supported by Sikorsky in a JV. Was reading on the other Aus industry website, maybe upto 20.
https://www.stickytickets.com.au/558...blackhawk.aspx
https://www.stickytickets.com.au/558...blackhawk.aspx
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
More on that A$170 Mil Sikorsky Helitech/StarFlight program here: 7 News Melbourne
Sikorsky Helitech's GM says that the aircraft will have "a maximum speed of 180 knots," so apparently they'll be dive-bombing the local bush fires.
I/C
Sikorsky Helitech's GM says that the aircraft will have "a maximum speed of 180 knots," so apparently they'll be dive-bombing the local bush fires.
I/C
I/C,
That's only VNE for the landing light or searchlight extended!
When they used to maintain them at Dirty Harry's in Sydney, part of the check was VNE on the way back. ~ 193 knots apparently. Audible for sure.
That's only VNE for the landing light or searchlight extended!
When they used to maintain them at Dirty Harry's in Sydney, part of the check was VNE on the way back. ~ 193 knots apparently. Audible for sure.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
