Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

EASA Demands NCAA lift ban on 225 & L2 (Article)

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

EASA Demands NCAA lift ban on 225 & L2 (Article)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Nov 2016, 10:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Right side of zero
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EASA Demands NCAA lift ban on 225 & L2 (Article)

Article from TV2's news site yesterday:

Norway pressured to use accident helicopters


Translation:

Norway pressured to use accident helicopters

TV 2 can reveal that the oversight branch EASA, which assures Norways adherence to agreementes with the EU, demands that Norway lifts the ban as it has been lifted in the rest of the EU.

In Norway, two types of the so-called Super Puma-helicopters are grounded due to safety concerns, after the Turøy accident in April.

The EASA considers that the necessary safety measures have been initiated, and that one now knows the cause of the accident, which was a fatique-crack in a gear inside the gearbox.

But this is not good enough for the Norwegian CAA, which states that the root-cause of the accident itself is still unknown: In that, how did the fatigue-crack really develop and why was this not discovered earlier?

- Against common sense
TV 2s revelation shock several offshore workers who do not wish to fly in the Super Puma on their way to and from their workplace, until the NAAIB knows everything about why the accident occured.

- It is against all common sense to commence flying with the Super Puma, when one has not received an answer. In that case, there is not a lot of respect shown with regards to the people who (would) use it daily, says Arne Geir Mehl, organisational secreteray of Industri Energi.

Mehl himself flies often and has had hundreds of helicopter flights to and from the North Sea.

- Do not want to go to work
- I don't like it at all that they are considering to commence flying again. There have been a few incidents in the British sector, and similarly now with the one we had in the Norwegian sector. Personally I don't think I will go to work if I know that it will come back, says Nina Grindheim-Hella, who work as a helideck crewmember in the North Sea.

13 People died in the Turøy accident outside Bergen. The EASA is now putting pressure on Norway, who has chosen to maintain the ban since the safety measures that have been initiated after the accident, are not sufficient.

- It is not OK to be forced into something that you feel is unsafe. We work in the oil business where there is a lot of focus on safety. This sounds strange, says North Sea worker Ole Westhrin.

- Does it frighten you?

- It is not a pleasant feeling, Westhrin says to TV 2.

- We live in Norway, we must be allowed to have our own regulations regarding these things. There is zero confidence in the Super Puma. The North Sea workforce does not want it in Norway, Mehl states, from Industri Energi.

Experts in Norway support ban

TV 2s revelation about the EASA pushing to have the ban lifted in Norway is not well received by Norwegian helicopter safety experts.

- Samarbeidsforum (cooperation forum) supports the Norwegian CAAs handling of this case. We think it is important that we get the NAAIBs conclusion and that Airbus accounts for the resasoning behind allowing continued use of these helicopters, Anders Røsok says, leader of the Samarbeidsforum for helicopter safety on the Norwegian continental shelf.

Last edited by Magjam; 28th Nov 2016 at 10:43. Reason: Format
Magjam is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2016, 11:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: D(Emona)
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 1 Post
So this is not a safety issue in eyes of EASA and yet unsigned OFP is level 2 by wonderful SAFA.
Thank you and goodbye.
Dufo is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2016, 11:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: nowhere special
Posts: 469
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Isn't the ac still grounded in the UK as well by the UK CAA which is a full EASA member?
nowherespecial is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2016, 13:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EC 225 Still Grounded

Yep. All UK 332L2s and 225s are subject to the same UK CAA Airworthiness Directive - no flights. See message below.

Sq
ScotiaQ is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2016, 13:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Following the release today by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) of proposals to allow the return to service of Airbus Helicopters' Super Puma EC225LP and AS332L2, the UK Civil Aviation Authority has confirmed that its existing restriction, prohibiting all commercial flying of this type by UK operators, is to remain in place.

The Super Puma helicopter accident in Norway on Friday 29 April is still under investigation by the Norwegian authorities and we remain in close contact with all offshore helicopter operators to continue to assess the situation.

We are united in our approach with the Norwegian Civil Aviation Authority. Both agencies now await further information from the accident investigation before considering any future action.

The safety of those who travel on offshore helicopter flights is a key priority. That's why in 2014 the Civil Aviation Authority launched a comprehensive review of offshore helicopter flying, resulting in significant changes in safety that were welcomed by everyone involved.

We will continue to work with the helicopter operators, the offshore industries, international regulators, unions and pilot representatives to enhance offshore safety standards still further.

For media enquiries please call the CAA press office on 0207 453 6030 or email [email protected]
ScotiaQ is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2016, 13:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: nowhere special
Posts: 469
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Thanks SQ, so are we to assume that the UK CAA is also receiving the same heat as Norway from EASA? if not, why not?
nowherespecial is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.