Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

S61N crash Florida

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

S61N crash Florida

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Sep 2016, 12:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, the TC Data Sheet lists max passengers at 39 + 2 pilots. That's 41.

Minimum Crew: 2 (pilot, copilot)
Maximum Passengers: 39, limited by emergency exit requirements

Shabby reporting by who? Looks accurate, though obviously they weren't outfitted for 41. I doubt many are.
CertGuy is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2016, 13:57
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,269
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/04d7abf9f420a47786257c670064810c/$FILE/1H15_Rev_18.pdf

I wonder how that looks? Maybe they use narrower seats in the right hand double rows, and then add doubles to the left?
212man is online now  
Old 14th Sep 2016, 14:05
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Insider....it said "Seats"....not "Passengers".

Small detail I know....but.....really!


Sadly, the FAA and their Preliminary Reports do not have a wonderful record of excellence.

If they get the Tail Number right seems to be about the limit of accuracy sometimes.
SASless is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2016, 14:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,269
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
, the FAA and their Preliminary Reports
NTSB even - small detail I know.....
212man is online now  
Old 14th Sep 2016, 20:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
212man.....finger/brain interface problem....thinking one thing and typed another.
SASless is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2016, 21:47
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will stand corrected on the TCDS then, I should have checked. Never saw more than 23 +3 crew in my day but the Penzance aircraft carried 30+ I think.
industry insider is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2016, 22:44
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 4,380
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Updated report and some pre and post crash video:

Remaining Palm Bay helicopter crash victims ID'd

Authorities confirmed the identities of two other people killed in a fiery helicopter crash last week in Palm Bay.

Brevard County officials named Jason Dunnam, 41, and Bill Nesbitt, 54, as the two other people killed in the Sept. 6 accident involving the Sikorsky S-61N helicopter. The pilot was identified Tuesday.

Authorities had tentative names but used dental and medical records to confirm the identify the men, all employees of AAR Airlift. The company has a hangar at Orlando Melbourne International Airport. The helicopter was on a "post-maintenance test flight" when the 1974 model aircraft crashed in a remote field in a mostly rural portion of Palm Bay..

The body of Greggory Cluff, 57, a retired Utah National Guard master aviator with more than 6,000 hours of flight experience, was found in the pilot’s seat of the air craft. Dunnam was identified as the co-pilot.

The accident happened as the helicopter hovered about 100 feet off the ground. The three filed a flight plan before leaving Orlando Melbourne International Airport.

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the accident.
John Eacott is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2016, 22:00
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somerset
Age: 77
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Penzance S61NM seating

Actually Insider, at full occupancy it was 32+3 Crew.

And climbing out of the Penzance strip at maximum weight when the WAT Curve allowed was quite something in terms of the decision height at the top of the 20 Knot climb.

I only ever did rejected take-offs from CDP out of there in training, the critical thing was not to dump the collective after touchdown as the ground was way too soft. But the permiiter fence was very close after stopping!
Steve Stubbs is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2016, 07:18
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cornwall
Age: 75
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes Steve - methinks the guy who approved that profile/WAT had his 'can-do' hat on that day. ;-)

G.
Geoffersincornwall is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2016, 04:41
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Total fuel on board of what....30 minutes?
SASless is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 12:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote; "The accident happened as the helicopter hovered about 100 feet off the ground"

looks to me like it happenned on the ground

engine failure presumably?
AnFI is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2016, 11:25
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,337
Received 630 Likes on 272 Posts
Read 212 man's post #11 - for the likely explanation rather than making stuff up
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2016, 17:50
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
crab i do note the ref to the CG heli fire
but I think I have as much right to speculate about a likely cause
and I would say more likely to be engine fail (and 2nd place inability to hover at height)

given "as the helicopter hovered about 100 feet"
anyhow it is just speculation either way unless there's some other inside gen i am not aware of
someone here probably knows what it was
AnFI is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2016, 18:58
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,337
Received 630 Likes on 272 Posts
So - engine failure at 100' - lower lever to contain Nr, push 10 - 15 deg nose down to gain speed. If ETL and say VTOSS achieved then fly away - if not flare and overpitch onto the ground - neither sound like a recipe for a fatal crash and all consuming fire.

Engine fire in 100' hover - as above but shutting down burning engine and using fire ext buttons.

That's the big advantage of a twin AnFi, the remaining engine gives you some options.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2016, 20:26
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's the big advantage of a twin AnFi, the remaining engine gives you some options.
Is that a good thing? Thinking about those options could waste valuable time and lead you into a false sense of security...
chopjock is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2016, 20:33
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,269
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Originally Posted by chopjock
Is that a good thing? Thinking about those options could waste valuable time and lead you into a false sense of security...
If your brain works that slowly, you're probably in the wrong profession!
212man is online now  
Old 28th Sep 2016, 22:15
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,233
Received 420 Likes on 262 Posts
Here's something for me to look forward too.


When the NTSB issues its report I will be looking it over to see if their assessment includes "one too many engines" or "extra engine carried created task overload for the crew" or words to that effect. I expect that I won't find any of that, but maybe the NTSB will surprise me.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2016, 13:08
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lonewolf,
Now that was funny.
CertGuy is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2016, 16:58
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,337
Received 630 Likes on 272 Posts
Yes, excellent
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2016, 17:13
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lonewolf
When the NTSB issues its report I will be looking it over to see if their assessment includes "one too many engines" or "extra engine carried created task overload for the crew" or words to that effect.
LOL Or perhaps the report might state "this aircraft has twin engine redundancy and should not have crashed, PERIOD"!
chopjock is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.