Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Island Connections and Off Shore time

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Island Connections and Off Shore time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Aug 2016, 13:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: saint martin
Age: 54
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry gulliBell
my question was not well explained,It was just wrote for those that not considering offshore island to island or whatever
I-IIII is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2016, 13:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 715
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Ka26. Log it all as "offshore" and apply.

OGP has boxed the industry into a Catch-22 situation - you can't fly offshore without offshore time and you can't get any offshore time until you fly offshore. So the rest of us were born with 1000 hrs of offshore time I guess. Either that or OGP expects you to build offshore time flying for a non-OGP compliant company until you have the experience to meet their requirements - unconscionable.


Reality is that it is just a box tic, and nobody check up or back. Nobody is going to put you out there as single-pilot captain on your first day offshore. You will fly with experienced pilots that will pass on the operational knowledge required. A doddle, really.

Think about it, all the zero-time cadets that went from an R22 straight to FO on an offshore S92. And you think they are going to be concerned about you?
malabo is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2016, 18:48
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post #21

Oh. Offshore island to island is not offshore, it's just flight time over water. Which might count for something somewhere, but not OGP. They are looking for in-field experience which makes you operationally useful on day 1 in the new job. Without it, co-pilot, no problem.
gulliBell is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2016, 18:54
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: saint martin
Age: 54
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well!
I would prefer someone that fly 3 time a day sardinia -rome(means 1.30 hrs open water) at others in GOM or Nigeria or whatever that doing 7 NM for to go on rig.
I-IIII is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2016, 21:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,282
Received 343 Likes on 192 Posts
I think you just answered your own question right there! Well done.....
Originally Posted by I-IIII
well!
I would prefer someone that fly 3 time a day sardinia -rome(means 1.30 hrs open water) at others in GOM or Nigeria or whatever that doing 7 NM for to go on rig.
212man is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2016, 22:47
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Falkland Islands
Posts: 171
Received 26 Likes on 3 Posts
OGP has boxed the industry into a Catch-22 situation - you can't fly offshore without offshore time and you can't get any offshore time until you fly offshore. So the rest of us were born with 1000 hrs of offshore time I guess. Either that or OGP expects you to build offshore time flying for a non-OGP compliant company until you have the experience to meet their requirements - unconscionable.
I think that is overstating the "Catch-22" aspect of OGP slightly.
As far as I understand, it is about the balance of offshore experience in a multi-crew operation. A co-pilot with less than 500 hours of (OGP definition) offshore time can fly offshore, but cannot be crewed with a Captain who has less than 500 hours of P1 offshore time. So a co-pilot brand new to offshore will only be paired with initially a line trainer, and then an "experienced" line Captain, and then when they reach upgrade to Captain, will only be paired with an "experienced" co-pilot until they reach 500 P1 offshore.

I would prefer someone that fly 3 time a day sardinia -rome(means 1.30 hrs open water) at others in GOM or Nigeria or whatever that doing 7 NM for to go on rig.
By that comment, you are misunderstanding the whole point of "offshore" experience in this context. It is not about "open water", or distance from shore. 1.30 x 3 of instrument flying at altitude over water with 6 airport landings has no relevance at all to the particular operational issues involved with offshore oil support. The pilots flying the 7 Nm sector to a Nigerian rig may be doing 20 landings a day on short inter-rig shuttle flights.
No one is trying to make out that the offshore flying is exceptionally difficult, it is just that it has its own set of issues. As we all know (and are frequently reminded by some on this forum), a pilot with extensive offshore experience only, would find many onshore operations to be completely outside their comfort zone until they gained relevant experience in the new role.

Last edited by Ant T; 29th Aug 2016 at 23:01.
Ant T is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.