212 Hydraulics off
It's 43 years since I last flew a Bell 212 so excuse any memory fade but at that time I'm sure we did practice landing with both hydraulics off during our conversion to type. If I remember correctly the only gotcha was that once lowered you could not raise the collective again.
I seem to remember it was controllable down to about 40kts. After that the controls could not be moved and you become a passenger, so you had to set up a long final approach with a low rate of descent for a run on landing and hope for the best. Ah, happy by-gone days!
212 Hydraulics off....not a problem....hovering is bit of work but have done that.
Trick on the Cyclic is not try to "move" it like normal...but just apply pressure in the direction you wanted it to move and let the "motoring" move it for you....otherwise having a breakfast of Gorilla Grits was required.
Leading with Pedal movements during Collective adjustments made it easier to handle.
The Collective was no problem.
The S-58T with both Hydraulics out was more fun than the 212....I always got the impression I was carrying the Helicopter in my Left Hand when the Aux Hydraulics were "OFF".
Trick on the Cyclic is not try to "move" it like normal...but just apply pressure in the direction you wanted it to move and let the "motoring" move it for you....otherwise having a breakfast of Gorilla Grits was required.
Leading with Pedal movements during Collective adjustments made it easier to handle.
The Collective was no problem.
The S-58T with both Hydraulics out was more fun than the 212....I always got the impression I was carrying the Helicopter in my Left Hand when the Aux Hydraulics were "OFF".
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many years ago during my offshore days, we did our annual check rides and practiced landings to helipads on oil rigs and ships with emergency governor, both hydraulics off, single engine, etc. etc. (Not all at the same time!)
Long time since I drove a 212.
As I recall the. no hydrualics procedure. it was advisable not to lower the collective below 35Q or it would be just about impossible to raise again.
Not hard to arrange a safe arrival profile.
As I recall the. no hydrualics procedure. it was advisable not to lower the collective below 35Q or it would be just about impossible to raise again.
Not hard to arrange a safe arrival profile.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes you can
In the '70's and '80's we did "both hydraulics off" zero speed landings with the 212 as part of our annual training.
As someone else said, try not to "stir the stick". Also, the collective when lowered is very difficult, but still possible, to raise.
Someone mentioned the single hydraulics Huey. This is a very different critter because all the 205 variants had inboard fittings on the head which allowed adjustment of (collective) hydraulics off forces. The 212 has no such inboard fittings so the collective force is set by the straps.
As someone else said, try not to "stir the stick". Also, the collective when lowered is very difficult, but still possible, to raise.
Someone mentioned the single hydraulics Huey. This is a very different critter because all the 205 variants had inboard fittings on the head which allowed adjustment of (collective) hydraulics off forces. The 212 has no such inboard fittings so the collective force is set by the straps.
In the '70's and '80's we did "both hydraulics off" zero speed landings with the 212 as part of our annual training.
As someone else said, try not to "stir the stick". Also, the collective when lowered is very difficult, but still possible, to raise.
Someone mentioned the single hydraulics Huey. This is a very different critter because all the 205 variants had inboard fittings on the head which allowed adjustment of (collective) hydraulics off forces. The 212 has no such inboard fittings so the collective force is set by the straps.
As someone else said, try not to "stir the stick". Also, the collective when lowered is very difficult, but still possible, to raise.
Someone mentioned the single hydraulics Huey. This is a very different critter because all the 205 variants had inboard fittings on the head which allowed adjustment of (collective) hydraulics off forces. The 212 has no such inboard fittings so the collective force is set by the straps.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
212 Hydraulics off
When converting a 205 to the 212 rotor system, the 212 hub is used but the inboard fittings are replaced with a special STC part which applies a different bias to the TT straps. This allows the collective to be raised and lowered, hydraulics off, much like the stock 205 with single hydraulic (No1) collective servo switched off, but the fittings are not adjustable like the stock 205 fittings. Worked OK. A "neutral force" range in the cruise torque settings, but progressively harder to raise or lower and the high and low end.
Doc
Doc
Last edited by Helicopter doctor; 26th Jun 2016 at 05:00.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi SAS, just picking up on your comment about flying the S58T with both hydraulics off. If you did this there must have been something wrong with the ship because the electrical switches are so wired that it is not possible to turn off both systems at once. Having observed the feedback through the cyclic when starting the rotor without the electrical ground hydraulic pump running gives an indication of the forces at play here and I seriously doubt you could control the ship in flight with both systems off. You're right about the "weight" of the controls when Aux hydraulics are off, they are very heavy.
Upon reflection my memory is you are correct....we did fly with one system or the other off as the control switch gave you a choice of each system off or both "On". It was with the Aux system off the controls got heavy. With the "Primary" system "Off" the controls just felt a bit sloppy.
I do not recall any Hydraulic failures during normal flight operations as the old girls were very reliable.
I do not recall any Hydraulic failures during normal flight operations as the old girls were very reliable.
Hi SAS, just picking up on your comment about flying the S58T with both hydraulics off. If you did this there must have been something wrong with the ship because the electrical switches are so wired that it is not possible to turn off both systems at once. Having observed the feedback through the cyclic when starting the rotor without the electrical ground hydraulic pump running gives an indication of the forces at play here and I seriously doubt you could control the ship in flight with both systems off. You're right about the "weight" of the controls when Aux hydraulics are off, they are very heavy.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sikorky Hydraulics
You cannot fly either the 58 or the 61 with "no hydraulics", or the 55 for that matter.
Part of your pre take-off check (as an earlier poster suggested) is that you check to insure that you cannot turn both hydraulics systems off at the same time.
This actually happened to me one time during the pre takeoff checks on a 61.
Finally, "Aux off " in a Sikorsky ain't that big a deal.
Part of your pre take-off check (as an earlier poster suggested) is that you check to insure that you cannot turn both hydraulics systems off at the same time.
This actually happened to me one time during the pre takeoff checks on a 61.
Finally, "Aux off " in a Sikorsky ain't that big a deal.
Last edited by oleary; 28th Jun 2016 at 07:00.
