Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Flike - personal rotorcraft

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Flike - personal rotorcraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th May 2015, 03:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flike - personal rotorcraft

Well, it flies - but does ground effect contribute?

(My advice - turn annoying sound down!)

https://youtu.be/H0epgrI4CDs

FLIKE ? The Ultimate Flying Bike

Dean
deanm is offline  
Old 30th May 2015, 03:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Fixed pitch rotors - wouldn't want to get out of ground effect, as it won't be able to autorotate when the batteries go flat!
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 30th May 2015, 05:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Age: 81
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Already out of ground effect, the rotors are more than one diameter off the ground. What a marvellous machine! Affordable too. Stabilisation technology already exists, so flyable by all.

Serious legislation required soonest!
henry_crun is offline  
Old 30th May 2015, 17:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
aotw...... Unless a motor seizes, it's likely the battery-controller will reduce available power , thus a gradual descent is initiated.... the methods are well established in the model-world and it would appear the technology is easily and practicably scalable.
no doubt there has been a lot of spin-off from the wind-power industry, also Solar and other generation forms, where power transfer and storage are required......see also, the latest "supercapacitor development using Graphene.

Henry is right!....the authorities will sit, fingers in ears, head in rectal orifice, until there are hundreds....they have a track-record of stable-door bolting.

hand gliding, Flexwing microlighting, parascending...and in other fields...the Go-ped (thousands imported until finally legislation caught up. ) , Segway.

The only case I recollect, where they were pro-active, was electrically-propelled, low power vehicles......I would not suggest that there was any lobbying by Sir Clive Sinclair, before attempting to foist his mobile bidet, aka C5 onto the public.
cockney steve is offline  
Old 30th May 2015, 22:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Fair enough on the engine failure then, that was my main concern. Great, then, looks like it could be really good.
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 31st May 2015, 10:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Netherlands
Age: 54
Posts: 3,185
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
More on engine failure

I looked at their website under safety but was not completely convinced:
If say, left forward clockwise engine would fail. How would unbalanced lift and difference in torque be countered?
I only find a solution for same lift when left forward anti clockwise engine can go to double torque.
When you allow for 0,8 total torque the left forward anti clockwise engine has to go up to 1,6.
All under the assumption that lift and torque have linear relationship also when torque over a anti and clockwise pair of rotors are factor 3 different.

Nice sunday afternoon mathematics!

SLB
Self loading bear is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.