Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helo INS wanderings

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helo INS wanderings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Oct 2014, 15:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Guest
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Helo INS wanderings

Chaps,

Just a general inquiry. For those of you who have aircraft fitted with an INS available for use as a navigation tool, what kind of accuracy over time are you getting? Anecdotally I've heard of a laser ring system wandering around 1nm per hour in a rotary platform. Is that typical in actual usage or are modern systems (without the aid of gps) getting better than that?

Cheers!
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2014, 19:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No longer at the coal face but I remember that in the early 80’s we had a Delco Carousel INS strapped down in the back of the Chinook to aid our long range navigation options (pre GPS!). It was very accurate for the first couple of hours (measured against Decca/Omega/Doppler) but several hours later (long range tanks fitted), low level over the water at night, we almost learned to our cost that a single INS is not that accurate. We learned about Schuler Loop that night!

ins/irs 'schuler effect' [Archive] - PPRuNe Forums
extpwron is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2014, 20:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 463
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Ah, overwater nav, we must have together!
chinook240 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2014, 21:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 952
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Helo Inertial

Some ancient history: The S-67 upgrade in 1972 had a version of the Litton ASN-86 ( LN-39 I believe ) from the Army OV-1B Mohawk. It was used for nav, running a CDC ( Canada ) moving map display from the A-7E, for the 20mm aim point calculations which fed to the F-111 head up display ( we borrowed from everybody! ), and the helmet tracking system that ran the 3 barreled turret. For 1972 it was pretty good.

Anyhow, that inertial spec was 0.5 nm/hr as I recall, but we got numbers in the 0.3 nm/hr on occasion. The environment was INU friendly: fairly low vibration levels and air conditioning.

Are you thinking of a stand alone INU nav system?
JohnDixson is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2014, 02:50
  #5 (permalink)  
Guest
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Aye, the system I've heard of is a modern laser ring system that has several blending options, but stand alone gives around the 1nm/hr or slightly better. Just can't quite believe that's up to industry standard based on fixed wing experience, but obviously the helo environment is not as ins friendly!
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2014, 03:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tasmania and High Wollemi
Posts: 439
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3nm plus 3t in hours used to apply for pre laser ring. Laser ring not much drift.
catseye is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.