Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Bell 505 Jet Ranger X

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Bell 505 Jet Ranger X

Old 27th Feb 2014, 23:19
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Matt ...... I think you were that kid Not a very clever comment !!
nigelh is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2014, 23:38
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kent
Age: 55
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congratulations Nigel, I have been involved in this project for 2 years, I am just leaving LA to return home, we have 6 for the UK ordered and over 120 signed orders at the show with more being completed which will be near to 200.
longbox is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 01:06
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 254
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
Nice work, R88, it looks almost perfect now! I felt that with the longer skids it should have a slightly extended rear body, so here is my little addition:

Tickle is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 06:03
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: HLS map - http://goo.gl/maps/3ymt
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
R88/Tickle - much better. Still not a looker by any means but much better proportions. Does the name suggest that this is yet another variant of the JetRanger as far as certification goes, or is it a new type? Have they learnt from the R66's mistake?
Aucky is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 10:07
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matt ...... I think you were that kid Not a very clever comment !!
Well i suppose our sense of cleverness differes as much as our sense in what we find appealing.

Have fun with your soon-to-be new helicopter. My apologies if you found my comment hurtful, but no need to make it personal. Thats not gunna' make the helicopter any prettier ;-).
mattpilot is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 12:43
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Depends on the day!
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Should be a new type cert, but a lot of the hardest part (rotor/drivetrain) are cut/paste from the L4 so that should reduce some of the complexity.
PhlyingGuy is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 14:31
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Sky
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even though it is just a mock-up at Heli Expo.

Bell HOPES to have a flying prototype by the end of the year........
Stinger10 is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 15:56
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certification

Provided that it falls within the rules there is no good reason not to have the 505 certified as a 206 variant which is exactly what Bell did with the 407.

Quite apart from the cost and the time taken there are inherent dangers in going for a new Type Certificate as Aucky has highlighted.

https://www.easa.europa.eu/agency-me...3_ROBINSON.pdf
chalmondleigh is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 17:11
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 696
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Even though it is just a mock-up at Heli Expo.

Bell HOPES to have a flying prototype by the end of the year........
As far as mockups go, this one is pretty complete looking...

SansAnhedral is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 17:23
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Sky
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All those "new" parts look very similar to well-known Bell aircraft.

According to Evans (Bell) from HeliExpo ......

"Evans said the utility-configured 505 show mock-up “very closely represents the basic aircraft as it is designed today.” From looking at it, Evans said, “people may think we already have a flying aircraft constructed.
Stinger10 is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 17:45
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 696
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Whoever said the rotor system on it was new?

According to Bell the entire premise is to leverage the exact 206L setup, I would not be surprised at all to see reused (or extremely similar) parts all over the place.
SansAnhedral is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 17:59
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Sky
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, its a ........ 206. Be nice to see a true new design instead of "re-package, re-name, and re-market".
Stinger10 is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 18:32
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 696
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
It would be nice, but theres no way anyone could do that for a million bucks a pop.

Certification and NRE alone would make it entirely unprofitable.
SansAnhedral is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 19:33
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shelton WA.
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sans, re. "no way anyone could"...add: especially Bell.


R88 and tickle you have the forward cross tube positioned where there is no internal structure!
Gemini Twin is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 19:49
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Age: 36
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely the skids are a shorter length so that the footstep lines up with the middle of the door...?
jhiles is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 21:55
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yorkshire uk
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not getting personal Matt .... Anyway no problem !! Yes , I agree it isn't going to make it any more pretty but I wonder if we will learn to love it . I never liked the look of the 480B ...... Then I bought one , flew it for a bunch of hours and ended up loving it !!! It is the helicopter of choice for my cocker spaniel as she could sit up front with me and curl up on the floor and look out of the floor window . She also loved the AS350 but is not keen on the 500 or the current 109 !!
As for having the L4 parts being a bad thing ...... I quite often fly an L4 over here and it is a truly great machine with I believe unrivaled reliability and safety . Of course a 4 blade head would be nice but you are not going to get that for nearly the price of a crappy old Robinson are you ??!!! ( or I imagine a lot less than an EC120 with old style avionics etc )
No doubt the next one will have the 407 kit but will be priced more to compete with the 350 . Anyway who wants to bet me I will not be able to fly my new Jet Ranger for 500 hours and then sell for a hefty profit ???!!!!!!
nigelh is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 04:25
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: florida
Age: 58
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pimp my chopper..

1. extended skids
2. imo better color
3. some tints

turbineturkey is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2014, 21:07
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,138
Received 95 Likes on 50 Posts
Police variant

Usually I am great at posting photos after the first day or so when I am at the show, sadly the business center computers were crap and I did not have the photobucket app on my iPad working / downloading / uploading that well.

Interesting to see the Police variant of the 505 (originally thought designation might be 515 as kind of mirrors SLS!) which is what caught my eye.











and I thought the red one was quite cute cheers
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 06:13
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: downunder
Posts: 136
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
New JR

I know I am strange, but the nose looks like a rat running along a rafter
I know the pics are of mock ups etc but it looks very rough compared to a EC120 ie panel fitting etc
Published useful weight figures are not really different to ec120 given it will need air at 26kg etc
Seats look like a ec120 knock off
The frame looks like a Robinson R44, not sure about survivability
Anyone know the price point, if its around the $1M then how do they do it the Arrius 2F engine is 600,000Euro outright, I know it is a 2R but it must be about the same, the VEMD and ICAS/MFD must be expensive.
What are the G ratings of the seats are they like the 120?
as350nut is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 11:56
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Depends on the day!
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Everything I've heard it's the million dollar price point. They're supposedly crash worthy seats.... Other than that...How different do seats really need to be?

You may not like the shape, but most people don't like the price of the 120... and the shape beats the looks of a r66 and that's what it's trying to beat.
PhlyingGuy is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.