Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

R66 v EC120

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

R66 v EC120

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jun 2012, 10:26
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who said BMW's are good anyway ?! (I don't agree with the analogy at all by the way).
Not me, but they are a different class whether you like it or not, Robinson Helicopters are mass produced and are cheaper to purchase and to build, this is fact, like the humble Nissan or Toyota or call it what you will.

The Eurocopter are sold in smaller numbers cost more to produce and are sold for more $$$ (just like a baby BMW or Mercedes-Benz), they also use a more advanced tail rotor design, main rotor head, composite MR blades and extensive use of composites in the fuselage, computerised systems, crash worthy seats, utility cabin, sliding door etc etc..

Just like a Cabri G2 is not the same as a 22, there is a price difference and both seat 2 people, forget about the car analogy, they are two different pedigree of choppers.
RotaryRat is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2012, 17:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near the bottom
Posts: 1,354
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I can't believe this has surfaced yet again! The R66 and the EC120 are like chalk and cheese, or for a more accurate analogy, a Caterham and a BMW. One is designed to be cheap, basic and functional with a relatively high power to weight ratio (and ugly IMO), the other is designed is to be sophisticated, solid and spacious with modern avionics/construction (and elegant).

You pays your money, you takes your choice; at the end of the day, the most suitable machine is one that ticks most boxes against your own requirements and priorities.
toptobottom is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2014, 00:13
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: France
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EC 120 Maintenance plan

Hi, the ec120 is the bottom line of Aerospatiale Helicopters, the R66 is the top line of Robinson Helicopters, w. RR engine.
So in this forum one compares 4 cylinder mnf's with turbine pro's offering a wide range of turbine choppers, even to US Authorities ?
Thus, let's talk maintenance, ec120 schedule is :
15hrs by the pilot or approved person (can be the pilot)
500 hrs
1500 hrs
12000 hrs or 12 yrs
engine Arrius is scheduled at 0.033 Man*Hrs per flight hr.
That's it.
So, how many hours does it take to have to rebuld your R66 enterely ?
I personally know one CEO managing 51 EMS twin helis and a simu in Germany. They are currently replacing BK117 by ec142T2 (enhanced power & fenestron TR). They trust in EC's. Curious, or ??? For his pilors I mer, an ec120 is just a toy for rich private owners.
Regards, Herbert, France
Herbert BRUDER is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2014, 15:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EC120 just a toy. Silly me, been using them for charter work for years! My bad.
John R81 is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2014, 15:18
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Age: 59
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
.

Hello John, you're a big boy flying a big toy !

.
HeliHenri is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2014, 16:25
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HH My life's ambition

Remember: Life is a competition. Whoever dies with the most toys - wins!
John R81 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2014, 01:43
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To say the R66 is the Nissan of helis and the 120 is the BMW of helis is just wrong. When comparing a Nisson and BMW automobile, you could state the BMW handles better, rides better, is quieter, has far better performance and so on.
You simply cannot equate those facts to the R66 vs 120 comparison. Fly both ships, THEN make the comparisons.
IMO, the R66 far and away exceeds the 120 in nearly every category, save looks. The 120 is gorgeous and the R66 looks like a tadpole or sperm.
There is a distinct reason the 120 barely sells and the R66 has a long back order:
The R66 is clearly the better ship. There really is no comparison.
PS
I'm a 120 fan.
13snoopy is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2014, 01:46
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Robinson Helicopter Co.

From Rotornut, Quote:
Depreciation (Negligible, freshly overhauled R66s are expected to sell for original costs)
Nonsense - would a potential buyer want a brand new aircraft or an overhauled used one with 2000 hours.

Rotornut,
The U.S. dollar weakens over time, while the price of an R66 rises. Thus Robinson's claims of nearly zero depreciation is correct.
13snoopy is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2014, 18:06
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The U.S. dollar weakens over time, while the price of an R66 rises. Thus Robinson's claims of nearly zero depreciation is correct.
please explain,then,
When I was a kid, we had 8- half-crowns to the pound....they were called, in slang, "half a Dollar"...So, the Dollar was 4 to the pound.....now, it's considerably less than 2.

I think that what Robbo's weasel-wording infers, is the overhauled heli will sell for the same number of dollars as it did when new.......but inflation will have made a new one probably ~20% dearer.
A bit like arguing that an ancient,overhauled Cessna will fetch more dollars than it cost new.....but it's still a tarted-up old dog that is less than half the price (and value) of a brand-spanking new-un.

So, Advertising bollix.
cockney steve is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2014, 00:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top of the World
Posts: 2,191
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts
Angel Airborne trash 66

66 (Crapinson Flimsicopter) equated to a Nisaan, is just damn wrong the Nissan is a well made quality vehicle whereas the 66 is like a pile of plastic scraps, old newspapers, super glue, used match sticks & a lot of luck

Fly Safe, if You value Life then stay away from ALL Robinson paper mâché products

Fly a real machine instead, anything be it Bell to a Aerospatiel, but NEVER a RHC
Vertical Freedom is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2014, 01:05
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
I always thought "Crazy Ivan" was a submarine manoeuver from a Tom Clancy novel, but apparently not:

The Russians have landed in Middle Earth | TVShows | 3 News

R66 makes it around the world - that's quite impressive.
krypton_john is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.