PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19th Jun 2012, 05:09   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: On the Rump of Pendle Hill Lancashire UK
Posts: 288
Flying Sheds

Many people refer to fact that in theory a helicopter should not fly due to dynamics being all wrong, well most helis are as streamlined as their designers try to make them.
Now if you put a stonking big engine into a oblong box, with a MR on the top and stuck a tail rotor on the side, how much power would be needed to overcome the forward wind/air resistance. And does it really need a TR to be out on a pylon, on said box you could fit a TR on each side

For if such simplistic thing as a box shaped Helicopter flying could be made to work, would that not be able to be more capable of carrying things like cargo and such items, without the constraints of intrustions like curves that make pax almost hug each other, even in bigger things!

I know its very early , but up before the sun always sets me off looking at odd ways of doing things!!

Peter RB
Lancashire
Peter-RB is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jun 2012, 05:55   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: home and abroad
Posts: 533
Those flying boxes already exist but they have tandem rotors..
S76Heavy is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jun 2012, 07:05   #3 (permalink)

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 2,931
Quote:
Many people refer to fact that in theory a helicopter should not fly due to dynamics being all wrong,
Some still say that about bees, however like helicopters amazingly they do!

Deciphering The Mystery Of Bee Flight


You'll be telling me cats can't fly next




Cats away! Artist turns his dead pet into flying helicopter after it is killed by a car | Mail Online
SilsoeSid is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jun 2012, 18:25   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: usa
Age: 32
Posts: 23
One basic reason the tail rotor is not right on the side of the fuselage, is that the thrust it would have to provide would require a giant rotor. By locating it further from the main rotor mast, it gives it a big arm, and can use less force to generate the same amount of thrust or anti torque at the main C.G.

Think of trying to open a car door right at the hinge not easy that is why the handles are on the opposite side of the door from the hinge.

Good question, I like the way you are thinking, we need more people to have these kinds of questions/ideas and together we can make an updated design for a helicopter, and keep improving!
agodesign is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jun 2012, 19:05   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 12
Helicopter Engineers....... Thinking outside of the box?
Amatsu is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jun 2012, 19:57   #6 (permalink)

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering in hyperspace and the FIR
Posts: 8,109
Of course sheds can be made to fly.

ShyTorque is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jun 2012, 21:19   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Milano, Italia
Posts: 1,964
I was wondering whether someone might raise the WG30 which, as many would know, was affectionately know as the 'Flying Shed'.

A slightly larger version of Shy's photo is here:

Savoia is offline   Reply
Old 24th Jun 2012, 11:03   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Here and there...
Age: 47
Posts: 803
Westland seem to be on a roll with that shape.
Round the corners off slightly, alter a few cues and you have the 139....
unstable load is offline   Reply
Old 24th Jun 2012, 11:39   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dorset
Posts: 299
The boxy shape suits a few helicopter designs - am I the only one who found the WG-30 a very attractive aircraft?
P6 Driver is offline   Reply
Old 24th Jun 2012, 11:54   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Royal Leamington Spa
Age: 67
Posts: 293
Quote:
.. am I the only one who found the WG-30 a very attractive aircraft?
A very attractive aircraft? Yes, in that you are alone.
Anthony Supplebottom is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 13:13.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".