Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Weststar 139 tail incident 30th June 2011?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Weststar 139 tail incident 30th June 2011?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jun 2011, 04:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Out there somewhere
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Weststar 139 tail incident 30th June 2011?

Anyone heard any news. Heard they lost a tail!
IntheTin is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 05:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 208
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep



Turkeyslapper is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 05:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Milano, Italia
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
.
The tally to-date:

1

A7-GHC Doha, Qatar: 25th August 2009

2

B-MHJ Hong Kong: 3rd July 2010

3

A7-GHA Doha, Qatar: 2nd May 2011

4

9M-??? Malaysia: 30th June 2011

.

Last edited by Savoia; 30th Jun 2011 at 08:57. Reason: Additional details courtesy of HeliHub
Savoia is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 06:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Where I'm pointing...
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speculation tally...

1xBonding failure
2xTR Gearbox (1x misplaced tool)
1x??
birrddog is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 06:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Milano, Italia
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
.
Not really speculating. Simply a list of 139 tail-related incidents.
Savoia is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 06:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Around the world
Age: 63
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1 Tail Boom failure connected to a previous damage on the same tail leading to collapse;
2 Loss of TRB in flight - possible Bird Strike - investigation ongoing;
3 Loss of TRB o the ground, investigation ongoing;
4 Separation of the tail rotor fin - possible hard landing - investigation ongoing
flyingboa is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 07:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft being used for training? Hard landing?

Even so, it doesn't seem to take much to break the tail off these 139s.

Last edited by industry insider; 30th Jun 2011 at 08:55.
industry insider is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 08:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Sav- item 3 was A7-GHA at Doha Intnl Apt (you know where to look for that info... ;-) )

All - you may find searches easier if you spell Weststar correctly - yes, it has a double "st" in the middle
helihub is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 09:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: LOS
Age: 67
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not wanting to jump on the speculation bandwagon, but the latest photo failure point seems to coincide with where the main rotor might impact the boom.
Outwest is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 09:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: daworld
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
"Even so, it doesn't seem to take much to break the tail off these 139s."

It hit the ground so hard the freakin main gear is wiped off! Of course the tailboom is going to be damaged!!!
noooby is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 09:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find it fairly interesting that you have four tail rotor separations of one type or another with no significant injury or loss of life.
Fairly fortunate I feel.
jemax is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 09:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
noooby

"It hit the ground so hard the freakin main gear is wiped off! Of course the tailboom is going to be damaged!!!"

You may well be right, it does seem down at the rear.
industry insider is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 09:42
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Milano, Italia
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
.
Exceedingly fortunate Jemax and probably why quite a few in the industry make light of the 139's tail escapades .. even referring to it as the 'Italian Doberman'!

However, when one of these incidents does result in loss of life we may see a sharp rise in apprehension towards the 139 - specifically regarding its tail section. Let's hope such a day does not arrive.
Savoia is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 10:37
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It hit the ground so hard the freakin main gear is wiped off!
the latest photo failure point seems to coincide with where the main rotor might impact the boom.
From what I am hearing, the training captain (with two students) aborted the first flight of the day due to some sort of handling problem and he just let it go down like a stone, causing the main blades flex enough to chop the tail. Is it true the TC only had 200 hours on type? The ground clearance of an AW139 is not that much, and the pic of the lonely tail rotor has a grounded helicopter behind, consistent with a very heavy landing and the u/c being pushed up into the fuselage which then ends up sitting on the tarmac.
helihub is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 11:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tax-land.
Posts: 909
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The ground clearance of what rotating part is not that much?
tottigol is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 11:42
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the air with luck
Posts: 1,018
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Seems a bit far back for blade strike, but time will tell.

The tyres, certainly.
love this comment UL
500e is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 11:49
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The ground clearance of what rotating part is not that much?
Ground clearance from lowest point of fuselage to the tarmac
helihub is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 12:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Great White North
Posts: 171
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Happy to see rotorcraft certified to the latest standards are proving to be much safer than old pieces of junk that have been out there for 20+ years (212/412/76)

At least the 'old stuff' does tend to stay in one piece
Encyclo is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 12:09
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Milano, Italia
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
.
You have to bear in mind that we now live in a disposable culture Encyclo!
Savoia is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2011, 12:14
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"From what I am hearing, the training captain (with two students) aborted the first flight of the day due to some sort of handling problem and he just let it go down like a stone, causing the main blades flex enough to chop the tail."


I wonder if the handling problem was related to the tail before the landing?

Weststar has grounded all 139s apparently.
industry insider is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.