PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Rotorheads
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Rotorheads A haven for professional helicopter pilots to discuss the things that affect them.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30th October 2009, 11:41   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4
What are Helipads' REAL Limits; MTOW or Actual Weight ?

Hello All: Sorry for my naivety here but I am only a military pilot. I have a friend who has a problem planning a helicopter use around downtown areas and most of the helipads are rated for a certain maximum weight. He is a bit worried that buying a new helicopter he will not be able to operate it to most/all of the rooftop pads because the aircraft of his choice (AW139) is over the limit of most of the pads which are only designed with the S-76 in mind. Can anyone/everyone tell me what the real limits are for these pad ? I'd like to get more than one input for sure from different perspectives/countries/CASA vs FAA vs CAA, etc in case they differ. Essentially, the 139 can operate at S-76/B412 weights with lower fuel loadings which is all he needs for the short hops he wants to make to and from these pads. Your inputs would be greatly appreciated. Thanks !
FlyHiGuy is offline   Reply
Old 30th October 2009, 13:14   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Borneo
Age: 43
Posts: 2,134
Well, I've been to 'the Helipad' in Singapore, and I wouldn't recomend trying to land an AW139 there (Helipad)

Seriously, I think that the other main consideration will be the dimensions. Normal Helipad ops in accordance with ICAO recommendations (Annex 6 and Annex 14 Vol 2) require a 1.5D pad, which I assume will mean the the 76 pads may well be smaller than required (depending on whether they were specifically designed for the 76, or just have a weight limit approximately the same.) On the other hand, if the intent is private use (lots of rich businessmen in the area) the situation will be different again - but will depend on the national regulator's rules.

Best to get the regulator's take on it I'd suggest!
212man is offline   Reply
Old 30th October 2009, 13:56   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Where the sun shines
Posts: 29
Call these guys:

Helideck Certification Agency - Home

They might have some advise to offer, not only on offshore decks.

brgds
SafetyCase is offline   Reply
Old 30th October 2009, 14:33   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: airport
Posts: 200
I'd like to have a friend with money to buy a 139 for downtown use too (in a town/country that's half the size of my backyard)...

Runway101 is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".