Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Baro-Vnav and Approach Minimums

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Baro-Vnav and Approach Minimums

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Oct 2017, 07:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 6554N
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Baro-Vnav and Approach Minimums

When using Baro-Vnav for RNAV Approaches, when is your approach minimum a Decision Altitude (D.A.) or a Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA). Thank you.
bluehawaii is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2017, 12:41
  #2 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the chart has a VNAV line of minimums, you use DA.
aterpster is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2017, 14:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can someone please explain: some operators/XAA's have an add-on to MDA, as this allows for a 'sink factor' during the GA. They still insist having the same add-on when using a DA, yet I thought this includes a 'sink factor'. Why is this, or is it simply standardisation to avoid forgetting it?
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2017, 15:40
  #4 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That add-on is supposed to be for MDAs that are treated as DAs. The sink factor is considered in criteria for charted DAs.
aterpster is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2017, 17:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: If this is Tuesday, it must be?
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately while this is supposed to be the case it is not universally true. Some countries/airports have just changed the label without reassessing the approach.
In Europe, the onus is on the operator (as always!) to find this out for every approach they might use. This leads to many smaller operators and pretty much all ad-hoc charter companies just continuing to add the sink margin even if the plate says DA. The resource required to do the assessment far outweighs the benefit, since how often will that 50 feet make the difference?
BizJetJock is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2017, 00:43
  #6 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pathetic, isn't it.
aterpster is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2017, 05:02
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 6554N
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks aterpster.
bluehawaii is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2017, 13:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Right there...
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess that if you are on a CDFA is like descending from the VDP. If you start your descent from the VDP and the ATC ask you to Go Around due to any reason or you decide to Go Around, you will not have an accident. NPA are flown ILS alike these days. So no harm in making the MDA a DA. Also no need to add on.
Togue is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.