KJFK RNAV Visual 13L/R
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Front right seat
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
KJFK RNAV Visual 13L/R
I see the JFK RNAV Visual approaches for 13L/R have been NOTAMed as withdrawn. Anybody know why? I'm questioning the Special Approval process and all of that, just the withdrawal of the procedures.
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i can only guess:
make the operators buy the RNP AR approach.
if they have 95% of flights with approval they can work the RNP approach with 500' minimums maybe.
when the minimums are 2500' so the RNAV Visual can be used there is no real need to fly that approach. traffic wise that is, would still reduce noise i guess.
so pushing more airlines towards the RNP seems logical.
VOR22L has 440' minimums so that fits well for running interleaved 22R and 13L down to 500' ceiling.
make the operators buy the RNP AR approach.
if they have 95% of flights with approval they can work the RNP approach with 500' minimums maybe.
when the minimums are 2500' so the RNAV Visual can be used there is no real need to fly that approach. traffic wise that is, would still reduce noise i guess.
so pushing more airlines towards the RNP seems logical.
VOR22L has 440' minimums so that fits well for running interleaved 22R and 13L down to 500' ceiling.
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts