Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Pub Quiz time..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Nov 2014, 08:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Somerset
Age: 67
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pub Quiz time..

Can any Pruners solve a Pub Quiz argument? What is the average hourly fuel burn of an A320.

Not to the nth degree just an average please.
sbdorset is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 09:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Europe
Age: 61
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, I'll take the risk, but only if everybody agree we're in a Pub after several beers and tomorrow we're not flying.

With a cost index slightly below LRC and landing weight 60 tons, trip fuel 37 kgs per minute flight time.
To be corrected half a Kg per minute per ton, above-below 60 tons landing weight.
This is only trip fuel, of course.

OK, too many beers. Time to go!
Gryphon is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 10:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: U.K.
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So a bit over two tonnes,then?
dash6 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 11:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In cruise, at a healthy weight go for 1,500kg per engine, so 3t per hour.

And in true pub style comparison, about the same as 200 Ford Cortinas (each one 15kg per hour). Dixie was spot on with his maths!
Superpilot is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 11:05
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Somerset
Age: 67
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks - the Doom Bar will flow later!
sbdorset is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 12:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A new 320 with Sharklets fitted is only just over 2 tonnes per hour.
qwertyuiop is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 14:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 572
Received 73 Likes on 21 Posts
...about the same as 200 Ford Cortinas (each one 15kg per hour)
Those would be very thirsty Ford Cortinas!

15kg (@0.755kg/L - standard density for road petrol) is almost 20L/hour. You'd need to be going at 100mph returning just 23mpg to burn petrol at that rate!

At a more reasonable 70mph returning 30mpg, you'd be burning under 11L/hour, around 8kg/hour. So the A320 is burning fuel at a similar rate to 375 of those Cortinas being driven equally sensibly.

Today's diesel car returning 70mpg at 60mph burns under 4L/hour, or 3.25kg/hour, so 925 of them could be cruising along at 60mph whilst burning no more fuel than just the one A320 in Superpilot's example.

A pint of Doom for me please - regards to Rock!
pilotmike is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 15:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
2400kg. ..
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 15:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 50
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can I ask the same question for a 747?
lonkmu is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 16:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: LHR
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747-400 : About 10-11 Tonnes per hour decreasing to about 8-9 at the end of the flight .

777-200 : About 7 Tonnes per hour decreasing to 5.5-6 at the end of the flight.

777-300 : About 15-20% greater than 777-200
Flap33 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 17:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pilotmike,

Well that's how my dad drove them, so there!
Superpilot is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 17:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford Cortina...there's a model I haven't heard mention of in a while..I'm surprised you pommies didn't stick a Reliant Scimitar in there for some extra fun.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 21:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: U.K.
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So for only another 500-700kg you could get a 757?
So what is the point of the A321?
dash6 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2014, 12:16
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Only another 700kg" costs about about £600 per hour, multiply that by the number of hours in your average sector length.

1,500kg per hour, per engine is for a fully loaded A320 with full fuel, it comes down to 1,100kg per hour, per engine for an almost empty one as others have pointed out.

What's the point of an A321?

There's more to it than just fuel - think fleet commonality (crew, training, parts)

Last edited by Superpilot; 24th Nov 2014 at 13:32.
Superpilot is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2014, 23:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For about another billion kilos you could get an An-225. What's the point of any airplane?
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2014, 00:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In the real world
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
757 3.2T/hour. 220 pax.
DooblerChina is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2014, 06:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of fuel weight and gross weight would that be for?
Superpilot is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2014, 06:41
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not coming to your Pub if this is all you talk about !!
Thai Pom is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.