Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Aircraft Range - Quoted Figures

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Aircraft Range - Quoted Figures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Sep 2014, 10:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Aircraft Range - Quoted Figures

Does anyone know if the quoted maximum range for an airliner (for example an A321neo has a quoted range of 3650nm at max load) is the actual furthest that the aircraft can fly or if an adjustment has to be made to take off contingency, reserves, diversion etc?

In other words can an A321neo fly for 3650nm before it goes into reserve fuel?

Thanks as always for any replies.
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2014, 23:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has an A321neo been built, test flown, and put into service?

Per the Airbus Aircraft Characteristics manual:

NOTE :
THESE CURVES ARE GIVEN FOR INFORMATION ONLY.
THE APPROVED VALUES ARE STATED IN THE "OPERATING
MANUALS" SPECIFIC TO THE AIRLINE OPERATING THE AIRCRAFT.

Last edited by Intruder; 9th Sep 2014 at 23:43.
Intruder is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2014, 02:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All the ranges given in the AFM I am currently looking at (DH8-300) state that range is given with "deicing systems off and at zero wind conditions." Furthermore, it gives an allowance in both time and fuel for taxi out, take-off, circuit and landing, taxi in and fuel for a 100 NM diversion plus fuel for 45 minutes at long range cruise at 5000 feet.

I would assume (there I go again, assuming) that Airbus would use a similar setup. However, whether or not that's what Bombardier (and, by extension to your question, Airbus) Marketing would think, I don't know...but marketing is a whole different universe in of itself.
+TSRA is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2014, 09:51
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks +TRSA - so it does include allowance for minimum diversion fuel.

My question was in general - I was only using the 321neo as an example.
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2014, 16:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certified data comes with defined assumptions and conditions. What those assumptions actually are will vary according to the operating rules, for example.

Contractual numbers 9in performance guarantees, say0 also come with defined conditions. those will vary by customer according to what they care about.

Published numbers could come from any of those sources, or company marketing, or ... . Any details of the conditions may be deleted or omitted in the process of the number being "advertised".

Bluntly, i would be quite wary of a detailed comparison and of assuming the conditions a specific number was based on. I'd want to see the fine print!
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.