Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Yaw Damper Failure

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Yaw Damper Failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jun 2014, 06:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Wish to live near Poles
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yaw Damper Failure

If Yaw damper failure occurs , Pilots are supposed to fly slow and Low.

Flying slow : Will reduce the lift on outer wing and corresponding drag ,
hence stopping the yaw to the opposite side ,
Thus cancelling the dutch roll.

Flying Low : What is the logic behind this ?
Can anybody help in explaining this ?
George Yogi is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2014, 09:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Denser air, aircraft is more stable. Do you really want to risk any kind of roll or yaw oscillation at FL370?
flyboyike is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2014, 11:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Dutch roll occurs when lateral stability is more powerful than directional stability.


As altitude (and therefore TAS) increases, the directional stability reduces at a greater rate than lateral.


Therefore the aeroplane is more prone to the phenomenon at higher altitude.


Seemples.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2014, 18:04
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Wish to live near Poles
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks
Flyboyike and LM
George Yogi is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2014, 19:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just checked my QRH, it just says to avoid moderate or severe turbulence, and use flaps 30 with a cross wind exceeding 30kts. No further operational restriction, so i can happily fly along at FL410 and M.819 if i wish to.
Denti is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2014, 20:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not the same for all types. For many the YD must be working in order for the autopilot to work. Not autopilot means no RVSM which means no FL410....heck, not above FL270 in some areas. Also, not sure I'd be a happy chappy without a YD up high for passenger comfort never mind anything else.
+TSRA is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 04:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Generally the larger the aircraft the more intense the effect.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 11:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Tree
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yaw is controlled by the rudder. The yaw damper operates the rudder to dampen the un commanded yaw. The book says with most aircraft, control the roll with aileron, should the YD be u/s. Why? The yaw can be dampened manually with gentle rudder input. There is quite a lag. Hint, "control column left, apply right rudder gently and momentarily" to reduce, then almost eliminate the unwanted oscillations. Get it wrong and you could have a problem of course. I am talking heavy, 4 engine first generation jets, with under slung engines. Worked for me and I haven't "wiped off any pods" due to side loads using this method.

I never wrote that!

Last edited by Sop_Monkey; 22nd Jun 2014 at 19:15.
Sop_Monkey is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 15:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sure, I know it is completely possible to manually dampen yaw osculations, no doubt though that the pax in the back of the craft used many more barf bags. Modern YD action is a rapid movement that (if you could watch the rudder) would look like a flutter providing much straighter flight.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 15:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Tree
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We honed our yaw dampening skills using rudder on cargo flights. Better the correct rudder input than no input when the YD became U/S. It could become quite hard work using aileron/spoilers to try and dampen the dutch roll, not to mention the increase in fuel burn and passenger discomfort. The book method is legal a**e covering, along with x-wind, non elimination of drift before touch down.

You would be surprised what abuse cargo would take and not a sick bag in sight.
Sop_Monkey is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2014, 05:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FREIGHT IS GREAT BROTHER, BOXES DON'T BITCH! Sorry for yelling...
grounded27 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2014, 11:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Density and damping

The "fly low" advice comes because damping is affected by altitude, particularly in yaw. Put in very simple terms, the yaw damping comes from the vertical stabiliser moving sideways through the air as the tail yaws from side to side. The denser the air is, the more damping there is, which means the yaw oscillations will die out quicker.

The rolling motion in a dutch roll comes from sideslip oscillations, which are an inevitable consequence of yaw oscillations. Again, roll is damped more by increasing density because the wings moving up and down during a roll have more air molecules to react against. This is particularly important for swept wing aircraft, which tend to have high lateral stability and thus roll a great deal with relatively little sideslip present.
WeekendFlyer is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 14:05
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: CGK to HKG
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Involved with test flights of the L1011 tristar, switching off the YD's was carried out. The oscillation was so violent I could cope only for 30 seconds before YD re-engagement...
Tinwacker is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 17:29
  #14 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I took my check ride in the actual aircraft when I got my type ride in the 727. Part of the maneuvers I was required to do, was to have the yaw dampers turned off, have the aircraft placed in a Dutch roll condition by the safety pilot in the right seat, then I was to recover from the Dutch Roll.

In the 727 you use opposite aileron of the direction of the roll and when the aircraft was stable, the yaw dampers were turned back on and we continued on with the rest of the check ride.

Failing the Dutch roll recovery was an instant fail for the check ride.
con-pilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.