PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page Fatal accidents Vs Hull loss / incident statistics
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register Forms FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read


Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15th Apr 2012, 09:57   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Next door
Age: 64
Posts: 49
Fatal accidents Vs Hull loss / incident statistics
Have had a look at the CAAs accident report summary which , typically, shows an annual fatal aircraft crash on just under 30 / year.

Anyone know if there any similar stats showing hull losses per year and / or aircraft damage incidents?

Thanks in advance.
Zoyberg is offline   Reply
Old 15th Apr 2012, 12:49   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somerset UK
Age: 59
Posts: 509
"Flight International" do an annual accident survey that covers fatal and non fatal accidents.
Have a look at the archive.
dixi188 is offline   Reply
Old 16th Apr 2012, 17:30   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 117
The Air Safety Network includes relevant information.
Aviation Safety Network > Statistics > By period > fatal airliner hull-loss accidents
happybiker is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39.

Privacy Policy - Terms and Conditions - Contact Us - PPRuNe Home - Archive - Top

vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".