PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15th Oct 2011, 17:17   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cheltenham, watching the VC10's go over
Posts: 162
Nose down

Some aircraft, A330 as an example, have a slight nose down attitude on the ground wheres others sit quite level.

I've noticed this on CRJs and MD80 series as well.

Is there any reason for this, is it a design decision at the beginning or something else?

GB
Groundbased is offline   Reply
Old 17th Oct 2011, 01:13   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,033
I am sure it was simply areodynamic design. The A330F has an ugly modification to raise the nose gear to compensate for loading purposes.
grounded27 is offline   Reply
Old 17th Oct 2011, 16:33   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 586
How about pure economics?

Needs the main leg length for landing to ensure tail clearance, but whats the point of a long nose leg? I suspect for each cm you lengthen it, it would have to be proportionally stronger, have more bracing around its mount in the fuselage and need a larger nose gear bay (=less room for other stuff!)

Just needs to be long enough to ensure engine clearance on taxi, the flip side being if you raise the nose far enough then you may decrease the ground visibility segment that is important when the fog is around and you are trying to depart.

Engineering - So many variables!

Last edited by Cough; 17th Oct 2011 at 20:55.
Cough is offline   Reply
Old 18th Oct 2011, 03:46   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 1,859
For CRJs at least, one consideration is keeping the sill of the forward doors low to avoid the expense of fitting slides to the stretched versions. So the main door stays in the same vertical position, while the back end rises for some of the rotation issues suggested above.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline   Reply
Old 4th Nov 2011, 23:45   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: outside the box
Age: 29
Posts: 61
You must admit though that those designed i.e. the Fokker 50 and some of the shorts series werent thinking aerodynamics that strongly... They just wanted to give these beauties a character!!

haha
Jp
Jetpipe. is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 20:29.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".