PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 24th March 2002, 02:08   #1 (permalink)

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: on reserve, usually
Posts: 1,027
Talking Lift question

At what stage of flight is lift the greatest?. .. .(With regard to the CCDE final app q?)
overstress is offline  
Old 24th March 2002, 03:14   #2 (permalink)
Boffin at Large
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 6,940
Post

The flare I'd think.. .. .G
Genghis the Engineer is online now  
Old 24th March 2002, 04:21   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: u.k.
Posts: 87
Post

I think that since the A/C was heavier on take off, the lift required would be greatest on rotation.
Silvertop is offline  
Old 24th March 2002, 18:47   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 2,997
Post

Ignoring accelerated flight, then I'd say S&L when done very soon after take-off.

It would depend on time spent climbing & climb gradient achieved.

My reasoning is that L<W in a climb or descent but L=W in S&L flight.

Maximum weight is at T/O but that's not necessarily when max lift occurs since the vertical component of T is partially supporting the a/c.

Next highest weight is S&L sometime after take-off. The shorter the period climbing the higher weight during the subsequent S&L so the greater the L being produced.

Last edited by Tinstaafl : 4th April 2002 at 18:03.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 24th March 2002, 18:58   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: oxford
Posts: 250
Post

If you want a really informed and expert academic opinion on your question, I'd say post it <a href="http://www.oxfordaviation.net/forum/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=15" target="_blank">here</a> .. .. .You'll get the opinion of one of the ground school experts from one of the top schools in the country - or, indeed, the world.. .. .Give it a go and see.
oxford blue is offline  
Old 24th March 2002, 19:35   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Broadford
Posts: 15
Question

INDEED! What are you like?
Skye Pilot is offline  
Old 25th March 2002, 15:06   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Sweden/Norway
Posts: 415
fish

How about in a power off stall with all high lift devices deployed fully?. .If you consider situations where ground effect is included I would say flare at max landing mass as there is no thrust vector to give a helping hand.. ./lns
low n' slow is offline  
Old 26th March 2002, 00:11   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 2,997
Post

I think a distinction has to be made between accelerated & unaccelerated flight.

Accel. flight lets you bump up the quantity by whatever load factor you apply.

Unaccel. flight resolves about balanced forces ie a steady state.

If the flare - one example of accel. flight - is allowed then I'll bid for a simple, high 'g' manouevre eg high pitch rate or the steepest turn the a/c'd Thrust will allow.

Last edited by Tinstaafl : 9th April 2002 at 23:23.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 26th March 2002, 17:17   #9 (permalink)

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,677
Post

I think a distinction needs to be made between lift, and coefficient of lift.. .. .Lift is greatest just after take-off. The main purpose of lift is to counteract weight, and weight is greatest just after take-off when there's maximum fuel. Any extra lift over and above the weight causes the aircraft to climb, which is exactly what it does just after take-off.. .. .Coefficient of lift is greatest at the point of the stall - this is a basic property of aerofoils. With regard to what phase of flight this relates to, I'd guess (although I'm not certain) that it would be during the flare, just prior to landing.. .. .FFF. .----------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 26th March 2002, 18:53   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 2,997
Post

Not correct, FFF.

An a/c climbs because it has thrust in excess to that being used to counter drag.

In a climb, T > D and L < W

Last edited by Tinstaafl : 9th April 2002 at 23:25.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 26th March 2002, 21:17   #11 (permalink)

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,677
Post

Tinstaafl,. .. .You are quite right, I'm talking crap. I'm going back to study this some more.... .. .Sorry,. .. .FFF. .----------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 26th March 2002, 21:20   #12 (permalink)
747FOCAL
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Lift is greatest at low altitudes.
 
Old 26th March 2002, 21:42   #13 (permalink)

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,677
Post

Ok, I admit it, I've completely confused myself with the crap I was talking earlier. Can someone please tell me where I'm going wrong???. .. .I'm flying along, straight and level. Lift=weight, and thrust=drag, so according to Newton's 1st law, I'm not accelerating in any direction, which is great.. .. .Now, I add power (or thrust), and wait for everything to settle down. I'm now in a steady climb, at (approximately) the same speed as before - not accelerating in any direction.. .. .According to Newton, since I'm still not accelerating, lift=weight and thrust=drag (at least approximately - this won't be exact because the lift, thrust and drag will be at a small angle). But I know that thrust has increased (I increased it!), so that means that drag must have been increased too, right?. .. .But drag is 1/2*rho*V-squared*Coefficient-of-Drag. Rho hasn't changed. V-squared hasn't changed (very much). I haven't re-trimmed, so I'm still at the same angle-of-attack, so the coefficient of drag is the same. So it seems like the drag hasn't increased.. .. .But in this case, the forces wouldn't balance out, and I'd be accelerating.. .. .What have I got wrong here???. .. .I used to know this, but I've obviously forgotten! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" /> . .. .Thanks. .. .FFF. .---------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 26th March 2002, 23:46   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 118
Post

@FFF:. .. .1st Error:. .“...I'm flying along, straight and level. Lift=weight, and thrust=drag...”. .This is a widespread myth. Because of wing & fuselage moments plus CG location effects, a downward elevator-force is required to achieve some kind of stability. Thus lift in s&l unaccelerated flight is always greater than weight.. .. .We have to differentiate quite precisely between the force created by the wing (lift?) and all the other forces acting upward and/or perpendicular to flight path, the sum of which support the vertical component of the total flight vector.. .. .Furthermore, it is this “small angle”, that makes a whole lot of difference in climbs and descents.. .. .To answer your confusion: The only thing you forgot in your calculation ref. drag is weight, which, in a climb, acts partially rearward, thus increasing the total force acting “against” the flight path.. .. .To be precise, during power-off descent, wing-generated lift is greater than during climb.... .. .happy landings
dolly737 is offline  
Old 27th March 2002, 01:13   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Spanish Riviera
Posts: 639
Post

FFF, if you study Newton too much I think you will find that you are always accelerating. Weight is a factor of mass and gravity with gravity being measured as a rate of change of velocity (acceleration). Therefore, to stay at the same altitude, you must have a constant acceleration towords the Earth's centre. Consequently, if you are in a steady climb or descent, your acceleration towards the Earth's centre will be difficult. Confused? . .. .My vote is with the simple explanation whereupon, unless in S&L flight, the forces of thrust & drag will always contribute towards 'lift' and 'weight'.. . . . <small>[ 26 March 2002, 20:14: Message edited by: Whipping Boy's SATCO ]</small>
Whipping Boy's SATCO is offline  
Old 27th March 2002, 11:58   #16 (permalink)

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,677
Post

Thanks dolly - spot on. In case anyone else is interested, I also found an excellent diagram of this in Trevor Thom, volume 4, in the chapter on climbs.. .. .I want to apologise to everyone for the huge amount of drivel I've been spouting on this thread. One of the great things about PPRuNe is that you can talk about any subject you like, safe in the knowledge that if you talk crap someone will pick you up on it before everyone else starts believe it! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" /> I'll try to restrict myself to commenting on things that I know something about in future... but no guarantees! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" /> . .. .FFF
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 29th March 2002, 02:05   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 359
Talking

This all seems a bit in depth for us more simple pilots. Being classically trained on the JP fun jet, I would have answered at 15deg AoA!
Miles Magister is offline  
Old 2nd April 2002, 23:17   #18 (permalink)

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: on reserve, usually
Posts: 1,027
Smile

I've found the answer. Thanks for all the entertaining replies everyone!

Looking back in my ATPL groundschool & CFS notes (and a littlle bird reminded me) I find that:

Rotation:

Due to body angle and wheel contact, (lift generation begins at nosewheel unstick), thrust assists lift here.

Climb:

As at unstick, there is always a component of thrust 'assisting' lift. Therefore lift cannot be greatest in the climb.

Descent:

There is always a component of gravity present, therefore lift cannot be at a max here either.

Manoeuvre:

There is always a component of thrust or gravity present here (eg a loop)

This leaves the cruise, assumed to be S&L.

In S&L flight, lift=weight. (as thrust=drag)

Weight in the cruise is always at a maximum at the beginning of this phase, due to fuel burn (assuming no Air-Air refueling)

Therefore lift is at a maximum at the instant you level off in the cruise.

Tinstaafl - you were spot on thanks

Last edited by overstress : 2nd April 2002 at 23:26.
overstress is offline  
Old 3rd April 2002, 07:12   #19 (permalink)

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Somewhere in the arctic where the sun doesn't set.
Age: 41
Posts: 4,051
lift is greatest at the wings max angle of attack just before the stall, regardless of speed, attitude, altitude, etc. You could be decending but at a high AoA therefore the wing is generating maximum lift possible. Equally you could be doing 150 kts, whack the stick back and stall the aircraft, in which case there is no lift being generated by the wing.........

Therefore it is 'most likely' that max lift will be generated at rotation (and subsequent climb out), and during the final flare, when the wings AoA will be at maximum (or should be in the ideal world).

Rgds
EA

Last edited by englishal : 3rd April 2002 at 12:31.
englishal is offline  
Old 3rd April 2002, 11:10   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Thailand
Posts: 879
At Rotation. The thrust vector at this point is accelerating the aircraft forward, the only thing getting you airborne at rotation is lift.
rubik101 is offline  
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Closed Thread
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2010 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".