PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24th October 2009, 07:32   #1 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bramdrup
Age: 33
Posts: 2
I need help with this question!

Hi guys I need some help with this question. Im desperately trying to comprehend the calculation in this question.

Airspeed in a decent is 90 kts. U have a 6 kts. tailwind component. The aircraft is at FL40. QNH is 1025.
Decend to level at 1000 ft. QFE 5NM before reaching the distination airfield.
QFE at the airfield is 1015. the decend will be started is 25 NM. from the airfield.

What will the ROD be?

Please tell my how you woulde solve this question.
keneter is offline   Reply
Old 24th October 2009, 09:17   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: south of 56n
Posts: 431
As an airtraffiker I will have a stab!!!

FL040 with QNH 1025 = 4360ft

Therefore assuming airfield at MSL you have 3360ft to lose?

Groundspeed = Airspeed + wind =96kts or 1.6nm per minute

Distance to lose height 20nm or 12.5 minutes

therefore 3360ft to lose in 12.5 mins = 269 ft per min??


OK thats just a guess from an air traffiker....maybe I shouldnt give up the day job....let the real pilots come along soon
fisbangwollop is online now   Reply
Old 24th October 2009, 09:28   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 199
First of all, calculate your groundspeed (a).

Next, calculate the distance (b) over which you have to lose your height.

Divide your distance (a) by the groundspeed (b) and multiply the quotient by 60.

You now have time (c) taken in the descent.

You now calculate height you need to lose. You are currently flying a flight level, therefore have the Standard Pressure Setting dialled up on your altimeter (1013 mb). But, you need to descend to a height with the airfield QFE set on your altimeter (the QNH in this example is not relevant). Maintaining FL40, what would your altimeter now read if you were to set QFE (1015 mb) (assume 1 mb equates to 27 feet)? You now have your current height (d). You are descending to 1000 ft therefore, the total height to lose (e) is current height (d) minus 1000 ft.

Finally, divide your total height to lose (e) by the time (c) to arrive at your answer.

Try and work it out for yourself before highlighting the rest of this post to reveal the answer.

Groundspeed is 90 + 6 = 96 Kts

Distance is 25 - 5 = 20 nm

Therefore Time in the Descent is 20/96*60 = 12.5 minutes

1015 mb (QFE) -1013 mb (SPS) = 2 mb

2 * 27 = 54 ft.

Therefore current height is 4000 + 54 = 4054 feet

Total height to lose is 4054 - 1000 = 3054 feet.

Therefore Required Rate of Descent is 3054/12.5 = 244.32 Feet per Minute.
Curtis E Carr is offline   Reply
Old 24th October 2009, 09:52   #4 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wycombe Air Park
Age: 57
Posts: 1,505
The airfield elevation is 300 ft (QNH - QFE at 30 ft per Mb) so you only have 3060 feet to lose over 12.5 mins, starting from 4360 ft AMSL. You get the same figures if you work just on QFE, so the QNH figures are irrelevant here. The exact answer would be 244.8, but one of the choices should be 250 fpm.

Phil

PS we take 27 ft per Mb only in Met questions. All others are 30.
paco is offline   Reply
Old 24th October 2009, 10:00   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 199
You're right, Phil

Must take my IRI head off.

See you Monday?

JD
Curtis E Carr is offline   Reply
Old 24th October 2009, 10:01   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: south of 56n
Posts: 431
PACO...Oh well was close, get your drift with regards QNH/QFE that makes more sense, was trying to look too deeply into the question....OK then its back to the day job for me
fisbangwollop is online now   Reply
Old 24th October 2009, 11:34   #7 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wycombe Air Park
Age: 57
Posts: 1,505
Curtiss - I'll be there - coffee will be on!

Keneter - the no 1 big tip is always to draw a diagram, with the big numbers at the bottom, because they represent higher pressure.

cheers

Phil
paco is offline   Reply
Old 24th October 2009, 14:49   #8 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bramdrup
Age: 33
Posts: 2
Hi guys thank you all for your replys i see how it works now thanks alot
keneter is offline   Reply
Old 24th October 2009, 19:34   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 62
Posts: 644
Lightning Mate is offline   Reply
Old 24th October 2009, 20:01   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 317
Alternatively (or should I say practically?) you're travelling at about 1.5nm/min. 20nm to go gives about 13 minutes to descent. Somewhere in the region of 3000ft to descend. 3000/13 (close enough to 12) = 250. So, how about you start with 250ft/min and see how things pan out?
Cows getting bigger is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".