PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11th Feb 2008, 19:29   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 21
ATPL Theory Exam Validity

Further to a previous post regarding the route to a CPL/IR, and having read D1 of LASORS, can anyone clarify the state of play with this scenario:

If I was to complete my ATPL theory exams and get my CPL, then possibly leading to an FI rating, would I still have to complete the IR within the 36 months of passing the first ATPL theory exam?

To put it another way, would an FI instructing on a CPL need to resit all of the ATPL exams if he didnt get an IR within the 36 months from passing his first exam?

Or, is it possible to sit the 9 of the exams required for the CPL theory passes then at such time as the IR sit the further 5, or does it just not work like that.

Thank You
Rich
RichieC43 is offline   Reply
Old 11th Feb 2008, 19:36   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London
Age: 29
Posts: 283
JAR-FCL 1.185:
(c) If the IR(A) has not been
revalidated/renewed within the preceding
7 years, the holder will be required to retake the
IR(A) theoretical knowledge examination and
skill test [...]
selfin is offline   Reply
Old 11th Feb 2008, 19:43   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 21
Thanks Selfin, not really sure that relates to my query though, Im talking issue of the IR as opposed to revalidation.

Clearly for issue of the CPL/IR fATPL I need passes in the 14 theory exams.

However, If I didnt complete the IR module within the normal 36 months since the exams, would I therefore have to re sit all of them again if I wanted to do the IR at a later stage?

Cheers

Rich

Last edited by RichieC43; 11th Feb 2008 at 19:48. Reason: clarity
RichieC43 is offline   Reply
Old 11th Feb 2008, 20:05   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 927
yes, you would have to resit them all.
mcgoo is offline   Reply
Old 11th Feb 2008, 20:18   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London
Age: 29
Posts: 283
Ah, bit hasty of me. You want JAR-FCL 1.495:

(a) A pass in the theoretical knowledge
examinations given in accordance with JAR–FCL
1.490 will be accepted for the grant of the
CPL(A) or IR(A) during the 36 months from the
date of gaining a Pass in all the required
examination papers.

(b) Provided that an IR(A) is obtained in
accordance with (a) above, a pass in the
ATPL(A) theoretical knowledge examination will
remain valid for a period of 7 years from the last
validity date of the IR(A) entered in the CPL(A)
for the issuance of an ATPL(A).

If you intend to complete the IR outside of the ATPL theory exam validity period you could opt for the IR theory exams but these wouldn't enable you to apply for an ATPL (afaik.)
selfin is offline   Reply
Old 11th Feb 2008, 20:23   #6 (permalink)

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 48
Posts: 5,734
Selfin, correct; you'd end up with a CPL/IR. However, I suspect the OP would be after an ATPL and therefore would be required to sit all the ATPL exams again if no IR was obtained within the 36 months.

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".