Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Ballsy waterskiing display

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Ballsy waterskiing display

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Aug 2017, 23:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ballsy waterskiing display

This dude was showing serious cojones out on the Islands today

https://1drv.ms/v/s!AsUqLYgbkd8en21WuU2U4cyLh72T
piperboy84 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 00:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,202
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
Nothing "Ballsy" about that, just a demonstration of really poor PIC decision making.
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 00:47
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,614
Received 60 Likes on 43 Posts
Perhaps that pilot might consider my lifejacket thread, among other decision making considerations......
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 06:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: N.YORKSHIRE
Posts: 888
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Just a bit of fun. His choice. His risk to accept. Move along now.
Flyingmac is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 08:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: en route
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flyingmac
Just a bit of fun. His choice. His risk to accept. Move along now.
Well put (assuming the pilot owned the aircraft...)

Which Islands, PB? Scots accent in the video, but an N reg aircraft in the foreground.
rcsa is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 08:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near the Mountains of Sussex
Posts: 270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Isle of Mull

Webcam from the Hotel............ Glenforsa hotel Live Webcam
Blink182 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 09:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Virtually impossible in a nosewheel aircraft due to the dynamics involved, but within limits doable in a taildragger. There's even a demo team that does this regularly in formation, in Harvards.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 11:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: With Wonko, outside the asylum
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a bit of fun. His choice. His risk to accept. Move along now.
And when it goes wrong, what about the people who will take risks trying to rescue him? Swimming down into the water to get him out? The SAR helicopter and its crew, perhaps the lifeboat and its crew? The emergency services whose time will be expended? The hospital bed he'll occupy if he's lucky, and the person who can't be in that bed because he's occupying it? The police officers who'll deliver the news if he's not lucky? The investigators who'll have to try to write up this idiocy without upsetting his relatives? The Procurator Fiscal and Sherriff and others in the coronial process (perhaps)? The cost to society generated by all the above and the premature death of a financially successful person? The effect on his family and loved ones of his premature departure?

Flyingmac, you couldn't be more wrong. You simply couldn't.
B737C525 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 12:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No. Flyingmac is right, absolutely so. Humans did not progress by refusing risk. Accepting risk complete with its attendant problems, as you so properly pointed out, is a necessary and relevant part of life.


Darwin's survival of the fittest plays its part.
Capt Kremmen is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 12:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: With Wonko, outside the asylum
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you spoken to any people in the situations I mention? Perhaps you'd like to explain your point of view to them. I have, much more often than I would have preferred to.

There is considered, reasonable, risk-taking. We all understand that.

And there is idiocy: behaviour so likely to kill or injure, and to cause others to take unreasonable risk themselves, and cause them misery, and hurt the public purse, that it is quite beyond the bounds of reasonableness.
B737C525 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 13:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm an ex serviceman who, during his service was well used to sanctioning risk for others as well as for myself. I'd rather you didn't tell me that beyond a certain point military risk is different to civilian risk. Neither is under duress. Both fulfil a need for the person to test him or herself.


If we do not constantly push the boundaries, we lose the ability to measure and assess risk and consequently and understandably become more likely to become an unwelcome statistic.
Capt Kremmen is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 13:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a very divergent view of what is and is not acceptable risk.

Waterskiing aircraft is in some places comparatively common. If you do not know that, or the aircraft and pilot's capabilities your view of risk may not be accurate - equally neither may theirs.

However the world full of cotton wool version, where no one is ever hurt and no one ever does anything that someone else might think 'risky' is so dull there is little point of being part of it.
gasax is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 17:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ashwell
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I have a pal who used to help out with a voluntary mountain rescue outfit in the Lake District. I once asked him what he thought about folk who go fell walking in flip-flops and a T-shirt then get lost when the battery in the GPS fails and the weather closes in. His response was "Great, it's all good practice" which wasn't what I expected, so perhaps if the Cub had had a problem the rescue services mightn't have been too miffed.
VictorGolf is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 17:55
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, VG, I never had any fun dragging a body from the water. Don't know anybody who ever enjoyed knocking on a door and telling Mrs Smith that she was now the widow Smith.
MaxR is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 18:20
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: chester
Posts: 62
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by B737C525
And when it goes wrong, what about the people who will take risks trying to rescue him? Swimming down into the water to get him out? The SAR helicopter and its crew, perhaps the lifeboat and its crew? The emergency services whose time will be expended? The hospital bed he'll occupy if he's lucky, and the person who can't be in that bed because he's occupying it? The police officers who'll deliver the news if he's not lucky? The investigators who'll have to try to write up this idiocy without upsetting his relatives? The Procurator Fiscal and Sherriff and others in the coronial process (perhaps)? The cost to society generated by all the above and the premature death of a financially successful person? The effect on his family and loved ones of his premature departure?

Flyingmac, you couldn't be more wrong. You simply couldn't.
all the same arguments used to get motorcyclists to wear a helmet.

would you wear a helmet whilst flying?
artschool is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 18:59
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,202
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
If we do not constantly push the boundaries, we lose the ability to measure and assess risk and consequently and understandably become more likely to become an unwelcome statistic.
There are many ways to push your personal boundaries in ways that build skill and confidence, and where the gain in skill is commensurate with the risk. I am struggling to see how water skiing your aeroplane makes you a better pilot.....
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 19:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't think that anyone wrote that it did. The debate is about risk acceptance and management of risk.
Capt Kremmen is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 20:07
  #18 (permalink)  
Spoon PPRuNerist & Mad Inistrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Twickenham, home of rugby
Posts: 7,387
Received 244 Likes on 162 Posts
I believe that we had this discussion / argument before, regarding the "Ullswater Incident" http://www.pprune.org/private-flying...ot-guilty.html

Not much point in rehashing the same points, I think.

SD
Saab Dastard is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 21:00
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK

Then , is this the same pilot/aircraft that landed on a road in Scotland , not so long ago ?

I ask because that was a yellow cub as well

Possible character trait being displaced ?

Rgds
vetflyer is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 21:10
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vetflyer
OK

Then , is this the same pilot/aircraft that landed on a road in Scotland , not so long ago ?

I ask because that was a yellow cub as well

Possible character trait being displaced ?

Rgds
Damned Scottish yellow cub drivers giving us Scottish yellow Maule drivers a bad name!

IMG_0272.JPG
piperboy84 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.