Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

NTSB report on Icon A5 Crash

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

NTSB report on Icon A5 Crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Aug 2017, 01:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chicago
Age: 47
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NTSB report on Icon A5 Crash

Unfortunately confirmed came down to pilot error as many suspected

https://app.ntsb.gov/pdfgenerator/Re...Final&IType=FA
ahdguy is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2017, 05:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 1,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I can't help feeling that he might have been able to climb out of it if he'd just continued straight ahead up the valley. He had about 1.5nm to climb 300ft to be clear (just) giving him more space for the turn. Even if that technique wasn't sufficient, just making a forced landing straight ahead would have given better survival odds.

But, I wasn't there...

Fly safe, Sam.
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2017, 15:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LFMD
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
I think the NTSB is being diplomatic. If you look at the maps, and bear in mind this was their chief pilot who had no doubt flown over Lake Berryessa dozens of times, there's no way he was mistaken. He didn't 'turn' into the canyon, he flew straight ahead into it, when the correct course was a sharp left turn. It would be impossible to mistake the canyon for the vast area of northern Berryessa.

I'm quite sure that he was demonstrating a canyon turn, deliberately choosing a canyon that was just wide enough, and I'm sure he'd done it plenty of times before. Both the images in the report, and some quick math, confirm that it would be easily possible. Unfortunately this time he pulled too hard (AoA goes up to 15°) and it ended badly.

There are a lot of very useful images here: https://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms/search/d...163&mkey=95127
n5296s is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2017, 15:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 1,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for that, I'm inclined to think you're right.
Sam Rutherford is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2017, 15:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 1000ft above you, giving you the bird!
Posts: 579
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the unfortunate flip side - all of that data in a GA accident with no real witnesses paints a very clear picture as to what actually happened rather than what might have happened without the data, its fairly cut and dry, but a huge loss and a great shame for an accident that appears to have been entirely avoidable! Great loss and very sad.. Blue skies and may they rest in peace!
Jetscream 32 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.