Flying an ILS in VMC (Low hour PPL)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flying an ILS in VMC (Low hour PPL)
Good Afternoon All,
***Please let me start by saying that I understand this was covered a number of years ago, but as I don't understand it much, I'm asking again. Also, please understand that this is JUST a question, I have no intention of being in a situation where I have to use it before I've done my IR, or at least IR(R). I am a very low hour PPL.***
So, my question is this. My understanding of an ILS is that it is used to assist a pilot with lining up with the runway, and descending in such a manner as, even without outside references, they can land safely. Is that correct? Now, I have NO idea how one would even start to use an ILS (so if someone has time, it would be great to get a rough overview of how it works), but, if I asked to be taught it at the flight school, prior to starting instrument training (funds don't currently allow me to do the proper course), would that be acceptable?
I gather that, in the hugely unlikely event (unless you've done bad planning) that the weather closes in around you whilst en-route (and by closes in, I mean, really, closes in), you COULD ask for an ILS at your nearest airfield to allow you to land safely, if you were able to use it? Surely that would be a safer way to get you on the ground?
Hope that all makes sense. Basically, if I was able to be trained to use an ILS (but without gaining my full IR or IR(R), would I still be able to use one just to practice, in VMC?
Thanks in advance
T
***Please let me start by saying that I understand this was covered a number of years ago, but as I don't understand it much, I'm asking again. Also, please understand that this is JUST a question, I have no intention of being in a situation where I have to use it before I've done my IR, or at least IR(R). I am a very low hour PPL.***
So, my question is this. My understanding of an ILS is that it is used to assist a pilot with lining up with the runway, and descending in such a manner as, even without outside references, they can land safely. Is that correct? Now, I have NO idea how one would even start to use an ILS (so if someone has time, it would be great to get a rough overview of how it works), but, if I asked to be taught it at the flight school, prior to starting instrument training (funds don't currently allow me to do the proper course), would that be acceptable?
I gather that, in the hugely unlikely event (unless you've done bad planning) that the weather closes in around you whilst en-route (and by closes in, I mean, really, closes in), you COULD ask for an ILS at your nearest airfield to allow you to land safely, if you were able to use it? Surely that would be a safer way to get you on the ground?
Hope that all makes sense. Basically, if I was able to be trained to use an ILS (but without gaining my full IR or IR(R), would I still be able to use one just to practice, in VMC?
Thanks in advance
T
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kent
Age: 47
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi
Flying an ILS is an IFR technique that requires you to be able to fly 'on instruments'.
This means being able to fly using other instruments than the ILS readout. It is no good having the needles in the right place if you are in a 45 degree bank. If you are focusing on the ILS needles then you are not looking out of the window so need to have a good instrument cross check to remain at the correct attitude etc. All this is taught on an IR(R) course before starting on the ILS stuff for that reason.
Flying around on your own in the vicinity of an airfield practising an ILS without instrument flying tuition would be a VERY bad idea whether it is legal or not, which I am sure it isn't.
Do yourself a favour and get an IR(R). It will improve your flying and allow you to fly an ILS etc. If funds don't allow then stay VFR until you can afford it.
Flying an ILS is an IFR technique that requires you to be able to fly 'on instruments'.
This means being able to fly using other instruments than the ILS readout. It is no good having the needles in the right place if you are in a 45 degree bank. If you are focusing on the ILS needles then you are not looking out of the window so need to have a good instrument cross check to remain at the correct attitude etc. All this is taught on an IR(R) course before starting on the ILS stuff for that reason.
Flying around on your own in the vicinity of an airfield practising an ILS without instrument flying tuition would be a VERY bad idea whether it is legal or not, which I am sure it isn't.
Do yourself a favour and get an IR(R). It will improve your flying and allow you to fly an ILS etc. If funds don't allow then stay VFR until you can afford it.
If as a low houred VFR PPL you found yourself in weather you are uncomfortable with, fall back on your very short instrument appreciation lesson, keep the wings level, declare a mayday and let a radar unit talk you to either better weather or as a last resort a surveillance radar approach, do not try to fly an ILS with virtually no instrument skills.
It is no good having the needles in the right place if you are in a 45 degree bank.
I do completely agree with Prophead though. If you just want to get a feel of what instrument flying (including an ILS) is like, a PC sim is a pretty decent way to do it. Plus it will happily throw in things like gusty crosswinds and up/down drafts. Instrument flying is first and foremost about flying on instruments. Once you can do that reasonably happily, THEN it is time to start trying to fly approaches.
Very good advice from the previous posters.
To the OP: before running you need to know how to walk. Shooting instrument approaches like the ILS is based on controlling the aircraft using the instruments only, which is based on scanning them and interpreting them first.
It's not advisable or feasible to skip the very foundation on which instrument approaches are built.
To the OP: before running you need to know how to walk. Shooting instrument approaches like the ILS is based on controlling the aircraft using the instruments only, which is based on scanning them and interpreting them first.
It's not advisable or feasible to skip the very foundation on which instrument approaches are built.
declare a mayday and let a radar unit talk you to either better weather or as a last resort a surveillance radar approach, do not try to fly an ILS with virtually no instrument skills.
Back in the day when I taught Instrument Flying (IF) the first "let downs" taught were basic cloudbreaks ( initially a basic straight line descent to MSA, later on turns were allowed...), then moved on to survellance radar approaches (SRA), then on to PARs (!!!) and only then with perhaps 150 ish hours flying under their belt, and more importantly maybe 20+ dedicated IF hours "under the hood" were the students taught to fly a basic (raw data) ILS....now it no doubt can and is done sooner these days in the commercial training schools which have a higher emphasis on procedural IF than where I taught but nevertheless flying an ILS safely really requires a solid grasp of IF skills and a good solid IF scan...if you don't have that you will more than likely end up at 45 AOB or more, or stalled/overspeeded, or worse, due to chasing the ILS needles...
Having a go in a "sim" at an ILS is fine, but IMHO you'd be playing with fire as a low houred hour'ed PPL even thinking of attempting an ILS on the aircraft in marginal conditions. In the real world if you do get stuck above weather then as has been recommended, a "mayday" and hopefully help with a cloudbreak is a much much safer bet for a low hour PPL then an ILS.
Last edited by wiggy; 20th Apr 2017 at 09:02.
Yep,sorry, my fault, it's been a while and in a senior moment I forgot that of course they are still very much around in the mil world...and yes, very useful and IMHO much easier to handle than a raw data ILS.....
Forgive me for being a bit obtuse, but what part of intercepting the localiser is any different from intercepting and flying a VOR radial?
As for following the Glideslope, or the PAPIs, that will put you on a 3 degree glideslope, and is not really what is required for VFR GA aircraft.... Is there a recommended glideslope for GA aircraft, I have heard 6 degrees mentioned, but why..
.
As for following the Glideslope, or the PAPIs, that will put you on a 3 degree glideslope, and is not really what is required for VFR GA aircraft.... Is there a recommended glideslope for GA aircraft, I have heard 6 degrees mentioned, but why..
.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
(2) As you get closer to the ILS the needle gets twitchy, but it does matter if you lose it - you're wanting to land on the runway so it does matter if you miss it by a few hundred yards.
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is what training is for, even as a low hour start thinking about the IRR
To put it in context, soon after getting my IRR I flew a real live ILS approach in real live IMC. No instructor beside me, no-one else in the plane, no chance of a sneaky peak outside the hood. No chance of a second chance and no reset button.
Breaking out of cloud to find the runway where it should be was one of life's Eureka moments. But I hadn't realised how much it had drained me until I tried getting out of the cockpit, my legs had turned to jelly and my shirt was sopping wet.
So don't underestimate how taxing flying on instruments can be, especially real life when a mistake can be your last.
To put it in context, soon after getting my IRR I flew a real live ILS approach in real live IMC. No instructor beside me, no-one else in the plane, no chance of a sneaky peak outside the hood. No chance of a second chance and no reset button.
Breaking out of cloud to find the runway where it should be was one of life's Eureka moments. But I hadn't realised how much it had drained me until I tried getting out of the cockpit, my legs had turned to jelly and my shirt was sopping wet.
So don't underestimate how taxing flying on instruments can be, especially real life when a mistake can be your last.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And while we're on the subject of No No's at having a stab at untrained instrument flying, do no think for one second that the synthetic vision feature most VFR GPS's and tablets are equipped with nowadays would be an adequate substitute for proper IF technique in getting you to and down an approach. They aren't, you'd die.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SF Bay area, CA USA
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
piperboy 84 wrote:
"And while we're on the subject of No No's at having a stab at untrained instrument flying, do no think for one second that the synthetic vision feature most VFR GPS's and tablets are equipped with nowadays would be an adequate substitute for proper IF technique in getting you to and down an approach. They aren't, you'd die."
Please explain why. And if instrument rated?
"And while we're on the subject of No No's at having a stab at untrained instrument flying, do no think for one second that the synthetic vision feature most VFR GPS's and tablets are equipped with nowadays would be an adequate substitute for proper IF technique in getting you to and down an approach. They aren't, you'd die."
Please explain why. And if instrument rated?
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
piperboy 84 wrote:
"And while we're on the subject of No No's at having a stab at untrained instrument flying, do no think for one second that the synthetic vision feature most VFR GPS's and tablets are equipped with nowadays would be an adequate substitute for proper IF technique in getting you to and down an approach. They aren't, you'd die."
Please explain why. And if instrument rated?
"And while we're on the subject of No No's at having a stab at untrained instrument flying, do no think for one second that the synthetic vision feature most VFR GPS's and tablets are equipped with nowadays would be an adequate substitute for proper IF technique in getting you to and down an approach. They aren't, you'd die."
Please explain why. And if instrument rated?
Why: I've tried it on a Garmin 660 and IPad both bluetoothed to a GDL 39 3d for a full six pack and the motion and sight picture presented on the screen did not allow me to fly to what I felt were acceptable tolerances and I certainly wouldn't rely on it. Maybe I needed to be trained on how to fly using that method but it wasn't for me and certainly would not be for a non IR guy trying to shoot an approach in IMC.
As a pinch hitter faced with a vacuum failure or for backup situational awareness, sure. As a primary reference, no way.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you all. As I say, I have no intention of doing it, just purely wondered. The advice about calling a MayDay is evidently the way to do it.
So, on a related but slightly different note, can anyone briefly explain how they work, or is it too much detail for a forum?
Thank you
So, on a related but slightly different note, can anyone briefly explain how they work, or is it too much detail for a forum?
Thank you
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: localhost
Age: 25
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree with the sentiments above as to flying one without training though... IFR flying is drastically underestimated by some VFR pilots. Having done my IR(R), I can safely say that the last thing you want to be doing is an ILS if you get stuck above cloud without the training. As been said, declare a mayday and if you have to, do an SRA.
can anyone briefly explain how they work
If using an ILS, ATC may ask to to fly a procedural approach (possibly starting with a hold) which will then require you to follow a published procedure to 'intercept' the ILS. Alternately, you may be given radar vectors to intercept.
When intercepting, you will first intercept the localiser, which requires a turn onto the appropriate approach heading, allowing for wind correction, adjusting heading as required to follow the localiser needle. The glide path will be above you at that point, and will be intercepted from below. When cleared by ATC to do so, you will follow the glideslope down to decision altitude/height. At that point, you have to go around if you are not visual with the runway.
You do see a lot of pontificating on forums such as "dont try this without training" but in the case of an ILS in IMC, it really is the case - you need both good training and good currency to do it safely.
As for following the Glideslope, or the PAPIs, that will put you on a 3 degree glideslope, and is not really what is required for VFR GA aircraft.... Is there a recommended glideslope for GA aircraft, I have heard 6 degrees mentioned, but why..
If you try to fudge it to generate a steeper approach by flying with the needle off centre (i.e deliberately flying a dot or two dots above the 'slope) to produce a steeper glide you are into the vaguely uncalibrated and certainly the unknown and all the procedure check heights (e.g marker/DME) would be rendered usless .... all bets would be off .. (and you'd fail an instrument rating...).
https://www.google.fr/search?q=ils+g...UfXX-DAk_pAIM:
Last edited by wiggy; 20th Apr 2017 at 15:07. Reason: Increasing Brevi....
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Basically as follows. An installation at the airport concerned will send signals providing lateral (localiser) and vertical (glideslope) guidance. This will be interpreted by instruments in your aircraft that will then, provided properly set up and within operational range, provide visual indication to the pilot of your position relative to the design approach path.
If using an ILS, ATC may ask to to fly a procedural approach (possibly starting with a hold) which will then require you to follow a published procedure to 'intercept' the ILS. Alternately, you may be given radar vectors to intercept.
When intercepting, you will first intercept the localiser, which requires a turn onto the appropriate approach heading, allowing for wind correction, adjusting heading as required to follow the localiser needle. The glide path will be above you at that point, and will be intercepted from below. When cleared by ATC to do so, you will follow the glideslope down to decision altitude/height. At that point, you have to go around if you are not visual with the runway.
You do see a lot of pontificating on forums such as "dont try this without training" but in the case of an ILS in IMC, it really is the case - you need both good training and good currency to do it safely.
If using an ILS, ATC may ask to to fly a procedural approach (possibly starting with a hold) which will then require you to follow a published procedure to 'intercept' the ILS. Alternately, you may be given radar vectors to intercept.
When intercepting, you will first intercept the localiser, which requires a turn onto the appropriate approach heading, allowing for wind correction, adjusting heading as required to follow the localiser needle. The glide path will be above you at that point, and will be intercepted from below. When cleared by ATC to do so, you will follow the glideslope down to decision altitude/height. At that point, you have to go around if you are not visual with the runway.
You do see a lot of pontificating on forums such as "dont try this without training" but in the case of an ILS in IMC, it really is the case - you need both good training and good currency to do it safely.
Makes sense. Of course, I'd never try something without being instructed first. It's my full intention to get my IR(R), probably this year, but just saving the funds
If you intend to do an IR or IR(R) in the near future, it would be well worth joining PPL/IR (Google it). You will get a loads of advice and support there. And probably offers of flights where you can see IFR approaches being flown.
You'd be welcome to come up with me, but would require a trek to Cardiff.
You'd be welcome to come up with me, but would require a trek to Cardiff.
