Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Court of Appeal overturns Denham Noise decision

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Court of Appeal overturns Denham Noise decision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Apr 2017, 16:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Court of Appeal overturns Denham Noise decision

An outbreak of common sense ? : Couple who won court battle after 'shattering' helicopter noise caused Tess Daly to pull out of buying £4m home have ruling overturned by Court of Appeal (From Bucks Free Press)
gpn01 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2017, 17:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kent
Age: 61
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great news

OC619
OpenCirrus619 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2017, 18:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excellent news.
I wonder if these people ever fly away on holiday in noisy aircraft with any regard for the people on the ground.
Crash one is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2017, 23:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NW England
Posts: 100
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Which came first, the airfield or the residents?
Hadley Rille is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2017, 09:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting line:

******

He today pointed out that the Civil Aviation Act rules out trespass and nuisance claims relating to aircraft flights.

Subject to height and distance limits, the immunity applies to noise and vibration caused by aircraft on an aerodrome.

Flights did not have to be carried out "reasonably" for the immunity to apply, added the judge, who was sitting with Lord Justice Underhill and Lady Justice King.

***********


Would love to see the actual references!
xrayalpha is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2017, 11:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on the definition of an aerodrome but if it is restricted to licensed ones, a reason to keep the licence.
tmmorris is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2017, 11:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The full Judgement can be found here:

Peires v Bickerton's Aerodromes Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 273 (12 April 2017)

And some background about the original trial Judge:

http://www.legalcheek.com/2017/04/jo...e-peter-smith/
Legalapproach is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2017, 13:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ouch. The original trial judge gets something of a polite kicking there.

Not for the first time, I see from Joshua Rozenberg's legalcheek article.
BossEyed is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.