Tailwheel differences training
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tailwheel differences training
Hi Chaps,
I got 47 hours Chipmunk 'back in the day' but have now an EASA PPL with night. Will my Chippy time from 20 years ago get me an automatic tailwheel rating on my licence?
I got 47 hours Chipmunk 'back in the day' but have now an EASA PPL with night. Will my Chippy time from 20 years ago get me an automatic tailwheel rating on my licence?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire
Age: 49
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is no tailwheel rating and it doesn't go on your licence.
What you do is differences training and an instructor signs your logbook.
Because you have P1 tailwheel experience from prior to the time the differences training became needed, you don't need to do this.
What you do is differences training and an instructor signs your logbook.
Because you have P1 tailwheel experience from prior to the time the differences training became needed, you don't need to do this.
I had a long break from tailwheel flying. When I bought my current (tailwheel) aircraft, my insurance provider required some dual refresher training, including 15 landings. All done in a day though.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I certainly agree with SSD on this one, taildragger flying is a perishable skill. 15 recent landings is a bare minimum to be current. Your prior experience is a nice to have, but not a substitute for recency.
I *thought* that differences training, such as tailwheel differences basically needed resetting with an instructor if not used within the last 2 years.
Checking before posting I looked at CAP804 - and the wording seems rather ambiguous, so if the wording's not clearcut, it's probably not enforceable as mandatory.
But, it could reasonably be said to be a damned good idea!
G
Checking before posting I looked at CAP804 - and the wording seems rather ambiguous, so if the wording's not clearcut, it's probably not enforceable as mandatory.
But, it could reasonably be said to be a damned good idea!
G
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: in front of comptator :-)
Age: 66
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't use a wobbly prop for 15 years.
First I used a variable pitch prop. One flight and I felt good to go on a CS unit. Being legal I did as I felt and 18 months later it has been no problem.
Of course the skill needed for a tailwheel are very different, and much more perishable. But depending on the pilot and the aircraft the level of recency needed may vary considerably.
First I used a variable pitch prop. One flight and I felt good to go on a CS unit. Being legal I did as I felt and 18 months later it has been no problem.
Of course the skill needed for a tailwheel are very different, and much more perishable. But depending on the pilot and the aircraft the level of recency needed may vary considerably.
