GARMIN Aera 660, first impressions (Aera 500 user)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bad Homburg, Germany
Age: 72
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GARMIN Aera 660, first impressions (Aera 500 user)
Hi all,
as a long aera 500 user, I updated to aera 660.
Main reasons: Better power options (easily accepts USB, 500 shows problems), higher resolution, better visualisation (speed tapes)
My first impressions are very positive! I use it mainly as In-Flight-Entertainment as Cockpit-OK and jumpseat are history. It is so cool. I am in Australia, here are the screenshots:
http://www.vorticity.de/pub/FRAMEL.ZIP
Pretty cool: Higher resolution, 3D-View with Tape presentaion of SPD,ALT,VS. For general aviation I would rate it more as a dangerous toy distracting from real flying... Very good also: Safer Taxi with very good airport charts
Some issues are slightly annoying, also compared to the 500 and should be fixed in a software upgrade. As there are:
1. The presentation field 'Numbers' is missing - in the 500 it could be configured with information like SR/SS at position, time since airborne and much more - it's missing. Can only be shown via Map>Menu>ChangeDataFields ... Not very operational
2. Present Position can only be shown by Map>Menu>MeasureDistance... Or by touching the screen with the finger: Very appropriate: Position to the tenth of a minute, determined by fingerprint ;-)
3. UserWaypoints can only be entered by typing, better also by scrolling
3. Direct to Destination ICAO-ID only via Waypoint or nearest airports (within 200nm) or recent. No, I want to enter any ICAO-ID supported!
4. Option Landscape/Portrait is nice, but it turns to right so that GPS-Antenna and USB-Power are on on top, into field of view - better, if it would also turn to the left to let both cables go downward out of field of view.
5. It were nice if Screenshot-ON could be set as default so as to be ON when Power is switched on, if so wished
6. The screenshot release button is almost, in Portrait completely (!) hiding the digital TRACK on the Compass arc - very disturbing and so easy to correct. Position it bottom left, 30% up. OK for both Portrait/Landscape
7. Terrain is perfect as it was, nevertheless in 3D-View I would like to see 'Terrain above' in red...
All in all, after more than 5 year a very nice improvement. Used to the 500 you will feel at home with the 660. And Garmin showed that touchscreen can be appropriate to serious operations!
Hope this first impression helps! Enjoy, Bernd
as a long aera 500 user, I updated to aera 660.
Main reasons: Better power options (easily accepts USB, 500 shows problems), higher resolution, better visualisation (speed tapes)
My first impressions are very positive! I use it mainly as In-Flight-Entertainment as Cockpit-OK and jumpseat are history. It is so cool. I am in Australia, here are the screenshots:
http://www.vorticity.de/pub/FRAMEL.ZIP
Pretty cool: Higher resolution, 3D-View with Tape presentaion of SPD,ALT,VS. For general aviation I would rate it more as a dangerous toy distracting from real flying... Very good also: Safer Taxi with very good airport charts
Some issues are slightly annoying, also compared to the 500 and should be fixed in a software upgrade. As there are:
1. The presentation field 'Numbers' is missing - in the 500 it could be configured with information like SR/SS at position, time since airborne and much more - it's missing. Can only be shown via Map>Menu>ChangeDataFields ... Not very operational
2. Present Position can only be shown by Map>Menu>MeasureDistance... Or by touching the screen with the finger: Very appropriate: Position to the tenth of a minute, determined by fingerprint ;-)
3. UserWaypoints can only be entered by typing, better also by scrolling
3. Direct to Destination ICAO-ID only via Waypoint or nearest airports (within 200nm) or recent. No, I want to enter any ICAO-ID supported!
4. Option Landscape/Portrait is nice, but it turns to right so that GPS-Antenna and USB-Power are on on top, into field of view - better, if it would also turn to the left to let both cables go downward out of field of view.
5. It were nice if Screenshot-ON could be set as default so as to be ON when Power is switched on, if so wished
6. The screenshot release button is almost, in Portrait completely (!) hiding the digital TRACK on the Compass arc - very disturbing and so easy to correct. Position it bottom left, 30% up. OK for both Portrait/Landscape
7. Terrain is perfect as it was, nevertheless in 3D-View I would like to see 'Terrain above' in red...
All in all, after more than 5 year a very nice improvement. Used to the 500 you will feel at home with the 660. And Garmin showed that touchscreen can be appropriate to serious operations!
Hope this first impression helps! Enjoy, Bernd
Thanks - I'm an Aera 500 user who has been eyeing the 660 with interest. Do keep us updated as you learn more about the unit.
I'd be interested to see some photographs of it also within your cockpit?
G
I'd be interested to see some photographs of it also within your cockpit?
G
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 72
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have had an Aera 500 for quite a while and wouldn't bother with another Garmin GPS. I still use it as a backup as major features don't move, however, the high cost of the frequent Garmin updates just isn't worth it. Added to that is the non aviation map display.
Where I am, Australia, is lumped in with a South Pacific data base. Small changes anywhere in that region generate a change to the Garmin data base which I just don't need.
My main GPS Nav source is my iPad running an Australian developed program which has all aviation charts and other documents which update on the six monthly AIRAC cycle for around eighty dollars per year. That equals about one Garmin update.
Where I am, Australia, is lumped in with a South Pacific data base. Small changes anywhere in that region generate a change to the Garmin data base which I just don't need.
My main GPS Nav source is my iPad running an Australian developed program which has all aviation charts and other documents which update on the six monthly AIRAC cycle for around eighty dollars per year. That equals about one Garmin update.
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a bit disturbing to see something which looks like a PFD - but with no attitude indication. (And constantly being reminded of that fact as well...)
I'd certainly never want to use it in that view...
But I guess that was always the case with the any navaid like this which presents 'synthetic vision' or similar?
Which truly useful functions does the Aera family have which e.g. the Garmin Pilot on a tablet doesn't do? (Which, although again I'd never want to rely on it, does show some sort of attitude...)
B.
I'd certainly never want to use it in that view...
But I guess that was always the case with the any navaid like this which presents 'synthetic vision' or similar?
Which truly useful functions does the Aera family have which e.g. the Garmin Pilot on a tablet doesn't do? (Which, although again I'd never want to rely on it, does show some sort of attitude...)
B.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah - I can't disagree that the cost of database updates is the major downside of owning a Garmin.
G
G
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For UK users an annual airspace update at aero expo is £25, which is what I go for.
I do fancy a 660 though. I believe bank information is available on the synthetic vision page based on rate of turn, but a single unit to include pitch info would be nice.
Maybe not possible though since I think the portable AHARS units need to lay flat?
I do fancy a 660 though. I believe bank information is available on the synthetic vision page based on rate of turn, but a single unit to include pitch info would be nice.
Maybe not possible though since I think the portable AHARS units need to lay flat?
That's worth knowing re: AeroExpo.
There are standard inertial reference units that plug in - they'd need to be firmly secured to a bit of aircraft structure, ideally close to the CG. A bit of googling finds the units - costing around the same again as the 660.
G
There are standard inertial reference units that plug in - they'd need to be firmly secured to a bit of aircraft structure, ideally close to the CG. A bit of googling finds the units - costing around the same again as the 660.
G
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: in front of comptator :-)
Age: 66
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The unit has colour coding on the high terrain despite the OP's thoughts.
I like having a traditional moving map. Provided free with the unit. As well as the vector map.
I never use the panel page on the old 496, and I don't think I will use the synthetic vision much either. Although on the 660 the HSI is on the same page so I may use it every so often.
I've got it to replace my 496 and I'm pleased to have it. The screen is much clearer and larger. It will drive the EFIS and the autopilot. That's not so easy with a tablet. (Please note I did not say impossible).
If you get the other bit that gives the attitude then you also get ADSB in and it will display traffic info. If you are in the states then you get a load more.
I use a tablet on my knee for much of the time. But the tablet, or the program on it, has let me down twice and the 496 never has. I'm hoping for a similar performance from the 660.
I like having a traditional moving map. Provided free with the unit. As well as the vector map.
I never use the panel page on the old 496, and I don't think I will use the synthetic vision much either. Although on the 660 the HSI is on the same page so I may use it every so often.
I've got it to replace my 496 and I'm pleased to have it. The screen is much clearer and larger. It will drive the EFIS and the autopilot. That's not so easy with a tablet. (Please note I did not say impossible).
If you get the other bit that gives the attitude then you also get ADSB in and it will display traffic info. If you are in the states then you get a load more.
I use a tablet on my knee for much of the time. But the tablet, or the program on it, has let me down twice and the 496 never has. I'm hoping for a similar performance from the 660.
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have had the 660 for a week or so and had issues with it turning off without any input. The first unit was replaced and the second one is having the same problem. Has anyone else had an issue? It has the latest firmware uploaded.
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: in front of comptator :-)
Age: 66
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
