VOR/DME - Updated for Magnetic Variation?
Guest
Posts: n/a
VOR/DME - Updated for Magnetic Variation?
Low time newbie student here:
Studying radio navaids and VOR.
So far all sources are saying that VOR Radials are based on magnetic bearings, not true bearings.
I was wondering therefore how these are updated for the annual rate of change to magnetic variation?
Studying radio navaids and VOR.
So far all sources are saying that VOR Radials are based on magnetic bearings, not true bearings.
I was wondering therefore how these are updated for the annual rate of change to magnetic variation?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I was wondering therefore how these are updated for the annual rate of change to magnetic variation?
Only half a speed-brake
Yes they need to be updated. The little arrows point to magnetic north from the station's location thus indicating the variation. As MN moves, charts need to be reprinted.
Heading compass / gyro is magnetic, the complete navigation reference system is magnetic, VORs need to be magnetic too in order to fit to the system. It would be overly complicated to apply correction for NavAid variation in practical use.
Same reason why the ATC reported wind is also magnetic - provided for practical an immediate use. Unlike METARs and TAFs, which for practical reasons need to be geographic.
cheers, FD.
Heading compass / gyro is magnetic, the complete navigation reference system is magnetic, VORs need to be magnetic too in order to fit to the system. It would be overly complicated to apply correction for NavAid variation in practical use.
Same reason why the ATC reported wind is also magnetic - provided for practical an immediate use. Unlike METARs and TAFs, which for practical reasons need to be geographic.
cheers, FD.
Guest
Posts: n/a
MagVar
FlightDetent - thanks ok, charts reprinted with corrections each year. In marine charts we're only given a variation from a specific year and a predicted average annual rate of change to apply corrections manually on a case-by-case basis.
Thanks
Thanks
VOR transmitters are aligned using 'station declination' to a magnetic north value which existed on a certain date. But they are not updated with change of local magnetic variation until the difference between variation and declination becomes significant - at which time the 'man with the screwdriver' adjusts them and the new orientation is publicised.
Given the overall system accuracy of a typical GA avionic fit and the relatively short distance from the station used for navigation, it's highly unlikely that the difference is significant.
Try flying in a straight line between 2 VORs and watching the GPS CDI if you have one....
Given the overall system accuracy of a typical GA avionic fit and the relatively short distance from the station used for navigation, it's highly unlikely that the difference is significant.
Try flying in a straight line between 2 VORs and watching the GPS CDI if you have one....
Only half a speed-brake
2OP:
I guess the full story is that for different reasons aeronautical charts get reprinted somewhat frequently so the magnetic variation and it's depiction is being continiously updated with sufficient accuracy.
Using an oldish (2 years) chart and not applying the "annual rate of change" for MV is in practical terms acceptable, as in short distance (<30 NM ?) from the Navaid the angular error represent only a small physical displacement. On a written test, different story.
cheers, FD. (crossed post with BEagle)
I guess the full story is that for different reasons aeronautical charts get reprinted somewhat frequently so the magnetic variation and it's depiction is being continiously updated with sufficient accuracy.
Using an oldish (2 years) chart and not applying the "annual rate of change" for MV is in practical terms acceptable, as in short distance (<30 NM ?) from the Navaid the angular error represent only a small physical displacement. On a written test, different story.
cheers, FD. (crossed post with BEagle)
a man with a screwdriver pops round every couple of years and gives them a little tweak
*of any sex!
With almost universal use of GPS and INS I would think that before too long aeronautical navigation will switch to true (geographic) north for reference. No need for VORs to be 'tweaked' and runway designators to be periodically repainted. Ditto QFE, QNH and Standard Pressure Datum will disappear - all altimetry will be referenced to GPS sea level (with baro referenced back-up).
Last edited by Discorde; 28th Nov 2015 at 14:14.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Discorde, I very much doubt that. (GPS defining ALT that is..)
Firstly, it takes a bizarrely small box to interfere with GPS signals...
Secondly, Airliners (wrong forum I know!) fly efficiently at a certain pressure altitude. Changing levels just because the temp changes isn't going to be great.
Thirdly, for such a small change, the cost to worldwide operators is massive.
Firstly, it takes a bizarrely small box to interfere with GPS signals...
Secondly, Airliners (wrong forum I know!) fly efficiently at a certain pressure altitude. Changing levels just because the temp changes isn't going to be great.
Thirdly, for such a small change, the cost to worldwide operators is massive.
Firstly, it takes a bizarrely small box to interfere with GPS signals
Secondly, Airliners (wrong forum I know!) fly efficiently at a certain pressure altitude. Changing levels just because the temp changes isn't going to be great.
In the UK we frequently have problems when low pressure weather systems cross the area. Crews mis-setting or neglecting to change altimeter settings is a headache for ATC, the problem compounded by the associated turbulence distracting crews at critical times.
Last edited by Discorde; 28th Nov 2015 at 14:16. Reason: amendment
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Discorde
Not sure this is relevant to vertical traffic separation, which is the rationale behind the QNE setting
The QNE is not a 'setting'. The QNE is the reading in feet on an altimeter with the sub-scale set to 1013.2 hPa when the aircraft is at aerodrome or touchdown elevation.