Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Skyuber... or how is this even legal in EASA land?

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Skyuber... or how is this even legal in EASA land?

Old 8th Nov 2015, 23:31
  #21 (permalink)  
UV
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Essex
Posts: 649
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Coming back from Europe? Want to share the costs with someone you don't know?

Hmmmm, going to search his luggage? Just taking him one way? From Holland by any chance?

Any private pilot in his right mind should have nothing to do with flying passengers they have never met before.

The same should apply to any passenger wanting a jolly with someone they don't know, regardless of their "claimed experience".

I would give it a wide berth....regardless of what the "law" says.
UV is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2015, 16:52
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Düsseldorf, EDLE
Age: 41
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmm, going to search his luggage? Just taking him one way? From Holland by any chance?

Any private pilot in his right mind should have nothing to do with flying passengers they have never met before.

The same should apply to any passenger wanting a jolly with someone they don't know, regardless of their "claimed experience".

I would give it a wide berth....regardless of what the "law" says.
I just don't get all the negativity towards this.

There's tons of sites out there and the single most relevant problem in my view is that there is not one site that is good enough to create a critical mass to make it actually work on a larger scale.

I've used similar sites in Germany for a while and had great flights with people I would have otherwise not met. The negative arguments are the same that nay-sayers have against AirBnB, CouchSurfing, and anything involving stepping out there and meeting people.

Now, why do people compare this to Uber? Apart from the name, the comparison doesn't make any sense at all. Uber competes with taxis and that is a problem in some places such as Germany because you need a taxi license (compare AOC) to transport people from A to B on request and for pay.

Platforms that allow private pilots to advertise their seats on given flights to cost-share are not like that! They are to be compared with platforms where private folks advertise their free seats in their private cars to cost share - very popular, perfectly legal in Germany at least and a really cool thing (e.g. https://flinc.org/, blablacar.de etc.).

Now, I know those people who say "how could you step into a car with a complete stranger?" or how could you stay on the couch of a complete stranger (as in couchsurfing) but when you talk to people who've actually tried this, there are few who've made truly bad experiences.

I see it as a great way to share the things I do, in some instances to save money, and to meet great new people. And I fully take the risk to, once in a while, meet a complete nutter or two. I can always cancel the flight if I don't like the people who show up.

And the current EASA law has nothing against this - and that's a good thing.
Rhino25782 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 07:56
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
Anyone who wishes to risk flying unknown passengers should read this case of a pilot whose passengers turned out to be drug smugglers:

Welsh pilot cleared of cocaine plot tells of ?two years of hell? - Wales Online

It took him 2 years of hell before he was eventually found innocent.
BEagle is online now  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 10:13
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beagle

As in anything in life with any element of risk you take precautions to minimise that risk.
This was very much a case of police malpractice with no evidence and guilty until proven innocent there should be an enquiry into this case

You wouldn't climb a high mountain in winter in a tee shirt and shorts.
When I first read this this thread I thought that there was a connection with Uber but now realise that there isn't so rather than a financial gain its purely a means of putting people together.

I have my doubts whether there are enough where such schemes will actually work but its up to the pilot to determine the background and character of strangers and to cover himself.

Even in commercial ops there are PAX who will try to smuggle drugs and there are safeguards to screen those people through security.

Unless the pilot is going to land somewhere illegally then there should be no difference ? As stated the pilot needs to do his own due diligence on people he is carrying use his /her instincts and cover himself by getting agreements signed pre the trip.
In some of the countries I have flown all over the world you have to be street wise and cautious

Flying is a very expensive business and the more we fly the safer we become if these schemes help pilots to fly more then they have to be welcome

Pace

Last edited by Pace; 10th Nov 2015 at 10:25.
Pace is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 10:41
  #25 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,202
Received 46 Likes on 24 Posts
Smuggling is clearly only an issue if you cross any international borders.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 10:54
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It might also be a safeguard to add a note to your Gendec that you do not know one or more of the PAX cannot be responsible for checking their bags and inviting special attention? Small things like that can be a diamond in your defence if anything should happen?

With somewhere like a busy GA airfield abroad this situation could also happen with decent law abiding people you know well

What is there to stop someone flying into such an airfield off an internal flight in France maybe, parking alongside you? Waiting for you and your friends to go and get a coffee? Transferring drugs into your aircraft under the baggage carpets? Waiting till you clear customs and fly to your destination back in the UK and then days later catching a schedule flight to the UK to your sleepy airfield and retrieving those drugs ?

What would you do if on landing the aircraft was checked and those drugs found? The finger would point at you and your friends even though you knew them well and they were upstanding citizens. How many pilots lock their aircraft on the Apron in such airfields? Not many.

I even heard of one pilot who was offered a cheap re leather of his seats which were duly fitted containing XYZ (not drugs) luckily he became suspicious before a continental flight

So its not just PAX you don't know you need to be aware of

Pace

Last edited by Pace; 10th Nov 2015 at 11:46.
Pace is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2015, 13:33
  #27 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,202
Received 46 Likes on 24 Posts
I even heard of one pilot who was offered a cheap re leather of his seats which were duly fitted containing XYZ (not drugs) luckily he became suspicious before a continental flight
Shades of the last episode of Cabin Pressure.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2015, 12:51
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: The Wild Blue Yonder
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the inclusion of "Uber" in the app title has led to certain assumptions about this outfit.
Am I oversimplifying the whole thing by saying it's much akin to most lift share websites?

TPP
The_Pink_Panther is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2015, 21:58
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the inclusion of "Uber" in the app title has led to certain assumptions about this outfit.
I think it is natural to compare them to Uber. They put Uber in their name and according to the BBC article “Carlos Oliveira says they aim to have the largest aircraft fleet in the world without actually owning the planes” which suggests another Uber is exactly who they are trying to be.

It looks to me like they have modified the concept of Uber to fit the rules rather than rethinking private ride sharing.

As for legality who knows how the regulators will react and what additional conditions they may decide to come up with. In my opinion when passengers become customers regardless of the structure then the regulators will have a problem.
500ft is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 08:57
  #30 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,202
Received 46 Likes on 24 Posts


G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 09:46
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GTE

That statement in the cartoon I have a problem with!
" private pilots cannot fly people for money, its a safety thing"

Why is it more of a safety thing than flying people for no money ?
A private pilot can take a 12 year old up for a flight for no money and that is safe? But the passing of money makes it not safe?

That child is not of an age to make an informed decision so an adult will make that decision for them?

I am not promoting the idea of private pilots commercialising themselves, the very opposite as everyone whether paying money or not should be protected in their lack of knowledge of the capability of the pilot flying them or the aircraft and risks of flying in SEP aircraft.

I was always told as a PPL to judge another PPL by asking the question " Would I send my kids or loved ones up for a flight withy them?"

Some the answer would be yes but in a minority others not in a million years so varied is the quality of PPLs. I just find it strange that the passing of money makes a difference to safety of passengers?
Even adults who make informed decisions? How informed are those decisions with adults who know little about aviation or the quality and capability of the pilot flying them?

I remember my CFI when I got my licence many moons ago stating that this was a license to learn to fly on my own and 30 years later I question with NO money passing hands and adults making informed decisions on how informed those decisions really are in many many cases ?

Pace

Last edited by Pace; 13th Nov 2015 at 10:06.
Pace is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 11:29
  #32 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,202
Received 46 Likes on 24 Posts
I obviously just put the cartoon up because it was topical and amusing. However...

I think that the argument, really, is that if there's no money changing hands, the pressure is relatively limited to fly. If money is changing hands, then the pressure to fly is greater, and thus the need for greater judgement and skill.

It's a healthy argument - particularly since there's not much in the CPL about judgement, and most of the skill is about precision flying. If the CPL TK was all about judgement, and the skill test all about handling emergencies, the argument would be stronger.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 12:32
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GTE

There are bad CPLs too. Where the difference lies is that with PPLs there is a broader spectrum of experience and ability ranging from downright dangerous and incompetent to some PPLs who are well up with the best in ability skills and experience.

The problem being that Mr average passenger who is supposed to make an adult informed decision probably is not that informed on the ability of the pilot or the aircraft they accept a flight in.

Many Pax I flew in light twins really believed the second engine was a spare where the aircraft would perform as well if one died

Above the PPL level the motivations are probably different the skills, experience and capability usually higher so that band between the bad and good narrower.

my disagreement is that paying people are entitled to higher safety than those who are passengers for free on the implication that those who accept flights for free make an informed decision. Other than the PPL PAX or experienced PAX i have a problem with the informed decision part or that the paying of money entitles those to better safety

Joe Bloggs who owns his own company and company aircraft can legally transport his employees in that aircraft. those employees will know no more than the PAX climbing into Easyjet

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 14:56
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The issues regarding an UberSky type setup is legislation or regulation is running behind the technology and is trying to playing catch-up. In US cities where laws are in place strictly regulating taxi cabs especially in heavily unionized towns like NY and SF etc, that view Uber as holding out for hire ( and argue they should be regulated) as opposed to a genuine ride share are fighting like hell to control (and tax) the service. Uber has stated that based largely on their financial resources they will continue operating as if they are allowed to and litigate any challenges. They have also publicly stated that this strategy will allow their service to become so widley utilized by the public who will then become so dependent on it that no politician will dare incurring the wrath of the voters by inhibiting or legislating against the service. Their strategy seems to be working for automobiles but when it comes to aviation they aren't fighting local city hall they are up against the FAA which is a whole different kettle of fish. I'm surprised for the limited amount of revenue attainable versus the risk they would even bother with starting a GA ride share business unless it's a toe in water test run before they go after the likes of Netjets, Options etc. An example of how Uber flaunt or outright ignore municipal codes, there is a city parking lot near me where Uber drivers gather, some who distribute restaurant food even repackaging and adding personalized touches like adding condiments for final deliver. If a restaurant ever tried to do that outside a licensed and inspected kitchen they would be closed down.

I personally use Uber cars, the service is so good, inexpensive, convenient and professional I actually regret buying my last car which gets little use and I may sell it and just use Uber exclusively, aircraft travel however is a different story.
piperboy84 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2015, 16:51
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Posts: 611
Received 58 Likes on 29 Posts
If a restaurant ever tried to do that outside a licensed and inspected kitchen they would be closed down.
Agreed but that's not the point - to compare you have to look at the meal sharing concept, which is already causing restaurants headaches around the world:

https://www.mealsharing.com/

Why Home-Cooking From Total Strangers May Be the Future of Food - CityLab

BBC - Capital - Eat with strangers, make money?

FBW
Fly-by-Wife is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2015, 13:30
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: France
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just my private opinion: Regulators, and the UK CAA in particular, seem to delight in making life as difficult as possible for small AOC operators just as much as they take pleasure in doing nothing whatsoever to address all the grey market dodgy doings that we all know pervade the industry...
frontlefthamster is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2015, 03:32
  #37 (permalink)  
601
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 1,472
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
the requirement for those costs to be shared equally
So is the cost going to be increased so that the pilot, even though "paying their share" will still come out in front.

If not, the business model is flawed.
601 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2015, 20:05
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,089
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
If I were to do it, I'd have a company set up in my partner's name that owned the aircraft and leased it to me at a commercial rate. Then anything I pay as part of "cost sharing" eventually comes back to me.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2015, 20:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but you would still only be able to charge a portion of the costs to the passenger so what is the point of all the limited company malarkey?
Gentoo is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2015, 03:16
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,089
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Gentoo
but you would still only be able to charge a portion of the costs to the passenger so what is the point of all the limited company malarkey?
Aeroplane costs $100/hour to operate, lease company leases it to me for $300/hour, I cost share it for $300/hour, worst case I only have one passenger and they pay $150 and I pay $150. Lease company pays operating costs of $100/hour and $200/hour to the owner (my wife). I have got all of my $150 back plus $50 profit.
AerocatS2A is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.