Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Bolt head 25 may

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Bolt head 25 may

Old 25th May 2015, 19:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bolt head 25 may

To the idiot in the Grumman AA5 that did a low pass at bolt head in the afternoon, not listening or transmitting on the safetycom, who then overshot and disappeared down the estuary via salcombe, next time l will get your registration. Look at the website you ferkwit!
frangatang is offline  
Old 27th May 2015, 22:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was on my boat in Start Bay on Saturday and noticed a light aircraft that could well be the same AA5. He flew south parallel to the beach but offshore. Unusually low, as he flew around the point I could see the lighthouse above him. It's height is given as 200' asl.
Vitesse is offline  
Old 28th May 2015, 16:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was on my boat in Start Bay on Saturday and noticed a light aircraft that could well be the same AA5. He flew south parallel to the beach but offshore. Unusually low, as he flew around the point I could see the lighthouse above him. It's height is given as 200' asl.
Offshore? So not breaking the 500' rule, then, even assuming there were people on the beach?
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 28th May 2015, 17:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, well clear of the beach.

I was concerned that he may have had a problem and kept an eye on him until he disappeared behind Start Point. Given the fantastic conditions that day I reckon the view was stunning from low down.

I don't recall seeing other light aircraft in that area at similar altitude which is what got my attention.
Vitesse is offline  
Old 28th May 2015, 21:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,775
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I don't get this. The guy was 500' from anything. If I was going to fly low along the coast, I'd check NOTAMs, but not nutter's websites.
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Old 28th May 2015, 21:49
  #6 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,202
Received 46 Likes on 24 Posts
Wasn't me (I fly an AA5, but wasn't airborne that day, or anywhere near Devon), but what website? I can't see anything on the chart or today's NOTAMs that would make low flying worse than at any other time.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 29th May 2015, 05:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Here's the Bolt Head website.
Bolt Head Airfield |
Like a lot of places, they only exist by keeping the neighbours placated, this ties in neatly with the 'why PPR' thread elsewhere. Hardly a nutter's website!
Good airmanship dictates that flight within the traffic pattern of an aerodrome be avoided unless intending to land there. In this case, this is only possible by prior permission. The OP wasn't objecting to the aircraft flying low over the sea, but flying too close to their aerodrome and upsetting the neighbours ( and potentially coming into conflict with local traffic without ascertaining via the radio if there was any such).
I would suggest that flight below 2,000' and within 2NM of ALL aerodromes on the 1/2 mil chart be avoided unless prior contact with them has been made.

TOO
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 29th May 2015, 05:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't me either...!..but in the old days,Millward and myself used to stay very low,often due to weather,kept the circuit very tight,to keep out of the footprint of local dwellings and few even knew the Bolt was an active strip!!
Pucka is offline  
Old 29th May 2015, 06:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: N.YORKSHIRE
Posts: 887
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Typed Bolt Head into SD. Nothing found. Are they sneakily calling it something else?
Flyingmac is offline  
Old 29th May 2015, 08:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: British Isles
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Salcombe..........
arelix is offline  
Old 29th May 2015, 12:13
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Back in the UK again.
Age: 77
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So are we talking about a low pass over the airfield (Bolt Head aka Salcombe on SD) or a low pass over the landmark known as Bolt Head?

The pilot may have been lost and looking for a landmark or may have thought he was making an approach to another airfield (been there, done that).

But as for "no-fly" zones, this is something I have had heated arguments about before with so-called "controllers" at remote grass strips. By the look of your website, these are areas subject to a local agreement to placate your neighbours who don't want low flying aircraft over their houses every 5 minutes. Theses areas are not mandatory, they are not marked on the charts. The only sanction you have is to insist that the zone must be avoided otherwise you will not allow an aircraft to land.

As for the feckwit in a C130 at 300 ft that flew through the circuit of my local grass strip (also marked on the charts), no-one would even acknowledge it happened when I phoned around to complain.
Bob Upanddown is offline  
Old 29th May 2015, 15:45
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,171
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
You guys are just stick in the muds. This guy was just following the sentiment so well articulated in the Ulswater thread

In our modern, risk averse, over regulated, nanny-state world, I have more than a passing admiration for people who push the boundaries and are prepared to take risks - provided, of course, that they risk only their own lives and/or that of a voluntary informed passenger. Probably my rebellious streak which I've had to keep in check.
Big Pistons Forever is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.