Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

1st April already? "CAA’s drive to reduce the size of aerodrome control zones"

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

1st April already? "CAA’s drive to reduce the size of aerodrome control zones"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Mar 2015, 00:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,643
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
1st April already? "CAA’s drive to reduce the size of aerodrome control zones"

I had to do a double-take and check the date when I received the email below.

As you will see, unfortunately for the majority of readers here, it's an NZ CAA proposal, but it's very nice to such a positive approach to Class G airspace. I bolded two key phrases.

Greetings Everyone
Airways NZ and the Tauranga Tower team would like to invite you to an airspace users meeting to present a proposed airspace redesign of the TG CTR/D.

Venue: Tauranga Aero Club
224 Aerodrome Road
Tauranga Airport

Time: Tuesday 17th March 1800L

Purpose: In conjunction with CAA’s drive to reduce the size of aerodrome control zones and relinquish controlled airspace back to airspace users as class G airspaces, Airways would like to gain support and feedback for a proposed redesign of the TG CTR/D. This process will be occurring around the country at all controlled aerodromes with the Tauranga Airspace users taking the leading steps
A reduction in controlled airspace has been identified as an important step in ensuring uncontrolled airspace is closer and more accessible to users, will provide improved VFR arrival and departure procedures that allow track segregation, reduction in risk associated with operations away from the RWY and vicinity and thereby a greater focus on these operations, less complexity for local operators and improvement in safety and risk management for airport, customers and Airways.

Importance: This airspace redesign will have an effect on the way the TG CTR/D is currently being used. A smaller, fit for purpose CTR will allow greater flexibility for operators outside the vicinity of the aerodrome, but will have require some changes to current operations.
The cynic in me wonders about the last sentence. I'll just have to wait and see.
India Four Two is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2015, 02:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same thing happens in EASAland, reducing i.e. RMZ/Echo combinations as a result of SERA - quite interestind side effects being told by chaps up there, though (crazy things like legal traps due to low RMZ in windpower rich mountainous areas).
ChickenHouse is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.