Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Potential ILS gotcha

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Potential ILS gotcha

Old 8th Mar 2015, 08:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Potential ILS gotcha

I came across this video on the COPA forum, well worth watching!

Jonzarno is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2015, 09:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jonzarno

Hence why its important to trust nothing and confirm all.
Always check spot points on the charts to confirm that the altitude you should be at corresponds with the altitude you are at on the glideslope or not on the glideslope as the case maybe

Pace

Last edited by Pace; 8th Mar 2015 at 09:39.
Pace is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2015, 10:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Age: 62
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One point Reminded me I have become sloppy and NOT identing ILS's frequency's that I am familiar with. Slap on the wrist and will correct this.
007helicopter is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2015, 11:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A good lesson in CRM. Of the 6 holes in the cheese that had to line up to lead to an accident, only the last, hole no.6, was prevented from aligning by an on-the-ball crew.

They had very little time to decide to distrust what is normally the most trustworthy approach aid in non-visual conditions - an apparently correctly indicating ILS display.

Well done them!
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2015, 13:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Gone
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting. I think we have all been guilty at some stage of not fully identifying ident ILS frequency at airfields we are accustomed to.

It would also be interesting to know how many times this particular crew had been into that particular field. I suspect a sixth sense creeping in before the fifth hole of the cheese lined up, working on the assumption that the crew had been in before.
Jetblu is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2015, 13:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They didn't fail to check the frequency - the frequency and indeed the morse ident were fine. What was missing was part of the glideslope signal and they had no way of knowing that.

If you think checking the frequency will prevent what nearly happened to this crew, watch the video again.
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2015, 13:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Gone
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shaggy. I did not mention the wrong frequency being selected. If you think I said that, check again. I said " not fully identifying IDENT on frequency.
I was particularly concurring with 007 Helicopter.

I am well aware what happened, how it happened and why.
Jetblu is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2015, 16:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saigon SGN/VVTS
Posts: 6,625
Received 58 Likes on 42 Posts
Jetblu,

Checking the ident wouldn't have helped either. That was being transmitted on the LOC signal.

As SSD said, the crew had no way of knowing that the GS was unserviceable. The GS transmitter was left in a test mode which meant that only one part of the GS signal was being transmitted, which meant that an ON GLIDESLOPE would always be received by an aircraft, regardless of its location!

A further hole in the swiss cheese, was that due to construction, the tower was not able to monitor the ILS integrity.

So the moral here is to treat an ILS as unserviceable if it is NOTAMed NOT MONITORED.

From a design point of view, I am staggered that the equipment continues to transmit an ident, if the GS is not in normal operational mode.

Kudos to Air New Zealand for producing this video. I can't imagine corporate lawyers allowing that these days.
India Four Two is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2015, 17:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes but second time round they treated the approach as a localiser only approach and this is my point if you treat the glideslope almost like a localiser approach i.e. check various altitude points against the charts then you can confirm that the two match up.

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2015, 00:32
  #10 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,178
Received 92 Likes on 61 Posts
Kudos to Air New Zealand for producing this video.

I was working for ANZ at the time and, while not involved at all with the investigation, I had discussions with one of the investigators whom I knew from a training course some years prior.

I was quite impressed by the mature and sensible attitude adopted in the investigation ..

I suspect that the event was a wake up call for anyone who took the time to read up on the incident. Reinforces the old adage that one should take in all the cues and information available to avoid stuff ups in flight.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2015, 11:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If their crew management training is as good as their spelling skills ... never heard of Jepperson charts ...
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2015, 12:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to make another point a correct ident does not in all cases mean the ILS is reliable.

We always make it standard practice to usually confirm the Glideslope intercept DME point if available against the altimeter so for instance if you are at a platform of 2500 feet and the glideslope intercept is at (just using a round figure) 6 DME on a chart! Then its easy to check one against the other. You then know your altimeter is set at the right figure and that the glide is correct.
Make a further check at around 1500 feet or nearest again against a chart depicted point and you know you are on the right glide. Don't just blindly fly a glide without backing it up an this appears to be the case with this crew until late in the descent so not really such good airmanship by the crew!

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2015, 18:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,169
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
Another scenario is an instrument failure. This happened to me once when I was teaching IFR

The scenario:

ILS no DME with a NDB at the FAF. DH 400 feet, FAF ctossing alt ( gp check)
1400. We were on vectors at 2500 feet and told cleared for the approach, not below 2000 until loc intercept and to expect to join at or slightly above the glide slope.

I knew we were in close so I told the student he had better expedite to 2000, but he was slow to react and we were at around 2200 when we intercepted the localizer with the glide slope almost full down. He then started an aggressive descent. Very quickly we were approaching 1400 with no sign of beacon passage. I then took control and levelled at 1400. The glide slope needle remained full down even when we passed the FAF so I imediately started climbing and followed the missed approach procedure.

On return to our base the system was tested and an internal failure of the instrument was confirmed. At no time did the instrument display a flag.

This scenario developed very rapidly and the student realized when I took over we were maybe one minute from flying into the ground due to the high descent rate he had established. He said all he was thinking of was chasing the gs needle. The glide path check point can literally be your last chance to save your life.

The final lesson was if you experience an abnormality during the approach, do not try to troubleshoot it, go around.

Ignore the bollocks taught in flight schools about switching to a non precision approach if the gs fails
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2015, 08:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,822
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
if you treat the glideslope almost like a localiser approach i.e. check various altitude points against the charts then you can confirm that the two match up.
If there was anything to take away from the video, it was that. Checking at the FAF at platform altitude with a fault as described will not reveal anything. Even at the marker, you might be unlucky and be at the correct altitude but on a steeper glideslope that will intersect the terrain short of the runway.

An RNAV-to-ILS approach is just as vulnerable as it would all check out until after you’d been coupled to the glideslope for a while. The RoD, power and pitch could be close enough to normal not to stand out, especially with changing wind or turbulence.
FullWings is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2015, 09:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,089
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
There is one Australian port I fly into that has a habit of NOTAMing the ILS as off for works at night but when you go in there you find no mention of it on the ATIS and if you tune and ident it you find that it appears to be working. I always make a point of confirming with approach what the actual status is if there is any ambiguity and I also make a point of letting the guys I fly with know about the Air NZ incident. Just because it has a valid ident and no flags does not mean it is a working ILS.

The other lesson I take from it is to conduct your glide slope checks at an altitude, not a distance. So if the marker check height is at 1300' then when you get to 1300' check your distance or check that the marker is sounding as expected. If you wait for the marker to sound and then check altitude you might find you've already lost terrain clearance if you were in a premature descent like those guys were. Ideally do a few glide slope checks, it's not like there's much else to do on an ILS once checklists etc are taken care of.

Edit: sometimes approach says they're just about to turn it off, other times they say it's been decided to leave it on for the night. Assume nothing.
AerocatS2A is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.