PA28-like aircraft above Paddington - in London TMA?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PA28-like aircraft above Paddington - in London TMA?
Hello,
Does anybody know, is it possible that I just spotted a light aircraft flying to and fro in London TMA (or London CTR at best, couldn't judge the altitude) or is it more likely that I suffered from an optical illusion? Time approx. 1740Z, track approx. NW-bound, then SE-bound, decisive turns rather than a racetrack pattern. Didn't show on flightradar24.com.
Ideas, anyone?
/h88
Does anybody know, is it possible that I just spotted a light aircraft flying to and fro in London TMA (or London CTR at best, couldn't judge the altitude) or is it more likely that I suffered from an optical illusion? Time approx. 1740Z, track approx. NW-bound, then SE-bound, decisive turns rather than a racetrack pattern. Didn't show on flightradar24.com.
Ideas, anyone?
/h88
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Weird one that. The CTA is now class D but why you would be pottering about in maybe a PA28 over London below 2,500 is beyond me. Unless you were thinking about putting it in Hyde Park if the donk stopped. 
Gnome de PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,636
Received 300 Likes
on
168 Posts
Possibly a PA-34, one often used for aerial photography over London when the weather is good - I usually get an email from the photographer, but haven't been at work today.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Age: 35
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could just be flying IFR, PIC could have an IR that’s all. As long as it’s equipped for IFR and the PIC is Instrument Rated it’s legal and normal.
I’m presuming that airspace is Class A? Then if not then the A/C would be receiving a Control Service.
I’m presuming that airspace is Class A? Then if not then the A/C would be receiving a Control Service.
Single engine over Paddington would be illegal unless in the TMA at a height sufficient to glide clear of the built up area. Hyde Park is neither clear of the built up area nor clear of people, although I guess thing was joking!
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Hopefully, with an aircraft strapped to my backside...
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn, MrAverage beat me to it - the requirement to land clear still applies no matter what for single engined a/c, as far as I know?
My FI told me of a microlight pilot who obtained an SVFR clearance across the end of the London City Airport CTA a while back and on landing at Biggin (I think it was?) he found himself on the business end of an investigation which resulted in a stiff fine.
My FI told me of a microlight pilot who obtained an SVFR clearance across the end of the London City Airport CTA a while back and on landing at Biggin (I think it was?) he found himself on the business end of an investigation which resulted in a stiff fine.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: london
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back in the day, a blind eye was generally taken to this sort of thing, but times are different now.
I have an unforgettable memory of flying along Oxford Street at 1700ft in a PA-38, at night on an SVFR clearance - but that was many moons ago, when such things seemed to be tolerated. On another dark night I was given vectors across the west side of LHR at very low level, and was slightly horrified after being handed off over Marlow at having to climb to join the Wycombe circuit.
