Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Out of date GPS

Old 17th Jul 2014, 15:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of date GPS

So, why is it, every plane I have ever hired with a GPS is out of date? Maybe I have hired 6 different planes with various Garmin or Avidyne things and all of them have been out of date. Why? too expensive?
tomboo is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 16:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: E.Wash State
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I had mine it was $700 a year to keep GPS database legally current, say for IFR operations.
obgraham is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 16:45
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That would be why then!!
tomboo is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 17:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lechlade, Glos.UK
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
An out of date GPS can be dangerous. If you hire an aeroplane that is advertised as having a GPS, then it must be in date.
sharpend is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 20:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: E.Wash State
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't speak for UK, but in US you are only required to have a current database if you are flying IFR and using the GPS to do it. Updates are on a 28 day schedule but you don't have to buy all of them.
obgraham is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 21:11
  #6 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,210
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by sharpend
An out of date GPS can be dangerous. If you hire an aeroplane that is advertised as having a GPS, then it must be in date.
Really, gosh.

And there was me thinking that it was perfectly reasonable to use the GPS as backup for my up to date paper chart and old fashioned navigation technique. And that even if the airspace moves, in my experience a GPS will still tell me where I am, which way I'm going, how fast, and where the airfields are.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 21:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Genghis - it's absolutely reasonable to demand stringent standards for something that cannot be your primary navigation system.

The 2x GPS in my cab are both running out of date maps. Similar position in my earlier 2 rides. By about 4 updates on average. Not actually found a problem yet. However, one day when they re-route the heli lanes or move EGKR 35 miles South of current location I will definitely need to update
John R81 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 22:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And there was me thinking that it was perfectly reasonable to use the GPS as backup for my up to date paper chart and old fashioned navigation technique. And that even if the airspace moves, in my experience a GPS will still tell me where I am, which way I'm going, how fast, and where the airfields are.
Well quite.

It's different of course if you're renting a plane in order to navigate in IMC using GPS ... in which case you make sure you know what you're buying, and you quite probably get what you pay for. And the same fleet may have some of each, which is fine so long as you know which is which when booking.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 06:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,776
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Both Garmins in all of the C172s I've hired in Colorado had in-date data. In the UK I've never had in-date Garmin data in the few aircraft I've hired. And the oldest Colorado aircraft was less than 10 years old. And fewer $/hour than £/hour in the UK. And no landing charges.
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 07:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,191
Received 148 Likes on 100 Posts
I don't know if this is a Garmin thing, but almost to the day that my 296 reached 10 years old, it stopped receiving satellites.
As I only used it in my own home built aircraft as a VFR backup, I had never bothered with the hassle of updating it.
Problem was, it fell over the very day I was rather hoping it would be a help on a Bass Strait crossing from mainland Australia to Tasmania in some barely VFR weather.
Certainly if you are hiring an aircraft, it would be reasonable to require all equipment to be 'in date'. In some jurisdictions that is also a legal requirement when the aircraft is available for hire, unless said aircraft has a MEL specifically allowing otherwise.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 07:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't think it's a Garmin thing, I've got a date Garmin 92 which is over 20 years old and still works just fine. The map is around 10 years out of date, but they haven't moved the airfields to the direct to function still gives very useful data, and a chart gives airspace info.
RTN11 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 07:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All these children of the magenta line panicking about being unable to rely on their beloved GPS units...
mixture is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 07:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Having had 2 data cards stolen from GPS units in our club's aircraft, as CFI I resolved not to waste any more money on buying new ones. But these weren't moving map GPS units (GPS 150 and GNC 250), so provided that the correct lat/long or aerodrome names had been entered in the route, the display showed DTK, TRK, GS and ETA - with the CDI bar showing cross-track error. Perfectly adequate for PPL flying, in my view.

Airspace avoidance was achieved by pre-flight planning on a current chart.

But a moving map unit, if it displays airspace, really should be kept up-to-date. Particularly in the impatient 'get in and go' current way many people fly these days.
BEagle is online now  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:45
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,140
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
What constitutes 'up to date'?

The Jepp database is updated on a 30 day cycle. Is a database 31 days old (previous cycle) out of date if used for VFR flying, when the AIP has not notified any airspace changes?

The Jepp database does not incude TRAs, so you still need to use other data from the relevant NOTAMs.

Most UK VFR pilots I know update annually, on the next cycle after the half-mill map change, and use NOTAMs and preflight planning to remain legal.
Fitter2 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah GA & Portsmouth UK
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An out of date GPS can be dangerous.
Oh dear! Now you have me worried. I have an old Magellan somewhere. Should I call the bomb disposal people?

I used to have a Decca Navigator too, luckily I got rid of that long ago.
Mike Cross is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mare Imbrium
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are worried that the out of date GPS may mislead you in some way then I suggest you turn it off...
Heston is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 11:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does being out of date stop it's navigational ability to fly the route as programmed. I used my old Garmin 90 for years without an update because the "Nav" page still did what it said on the tin IE:- Heading, X-Track error , speed, eta etc,

Never realised how dangerous it all was, I am perfectly safe now my Aera 500 has had it's yearly update last May
PA28181 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 12:22
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lechlade, Glos.UK
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
My point about an out of date sat nav being dangerous is that if one relies on it (as many do) you can run into big trouble. But of course one should reference your navigation to an up-to-date map. Correct me if I am wrong but it is a legal mandatory requirement to carry one.

My main point, however is that if you hire something you enter in to a contract with the owner who has a duty to supply what he states you are getting.
If he informs you that the sat nav is out of date, that is ok.

However, many of us do not update our Sat Navs every month as that is not cost effective for single owners. But then we are aware that errors may be inherent.
sharpend is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 12:32
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may be wrong, but I believe so long as what your choice of chart is, it doesn't matter if it's paper, or digital etc so long as it is current.
PA28181 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 12:45
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 352
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Can anyone point me to a piece of legislation that defines what is acceptable for use as a primary VFR navigation chart, and whether electronic is acceptable in place of paper ?

As Jeppesen have discontinued their European VFR paper charts it is becoming increasingly difficult to acquire paper versions for certain EU countries.

Thanks
jez d is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.