Question for commercial or high hour IMC private pilots
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question for commercial or high hour IMC private pilots
How do you feel about flying heavy IMC with a single attitude source . I.e. No dual vacuum pumps or backup AI, I understand you may have done it earlier in your flying career or while training, but would you do it now, and if so are you comfortable doing it.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Only occasionally above FL50
Age: 71
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
Limited panel recovery from unusual attitudes with no AI or DI has been part of every IMC rating renewal I have ever done. I wouldn't want to fly on limited panel for long but could, I hope, manage to get out of the IMC. If by 'heavy IMC'' the OP means conditions down to IR minimums, I don't think I would want to be there in the average light single in the first place.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having a T/S or T/C is a must, I would prefer to have a second altimeter before a second horizon; once, on IMC departure, I had my primary altimeter freeze at 500ft while climbing at 1000fpm IMC; second altimeter saved the day.
You need to practice partial panel from time to time, even on a simulator is better than nothing. It is best to have some device to cover the offending horizon because flying in real IMC with a failing and tilting horizon is disturbing.
You need to practice partial panel from time to time, even on a simulator is better than nothing. It is best to have some device to cover the offending horizon because flying in real IMC with a failing and tilting horizon is disturbing.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Suicide !
Flying IMC with only one attitude source is an accident about to happen...... It's just a question of how long before a technical failure results in a loss of control.
As for flight with only the TC, I was quite surprised how well a student go mine performed when during training the vac pump failed, the controler reverted to no gyro procedures and the student piloted the aircraft to minima on a PAR.
The student was at the end of his IMC course and was an above average student but it proved that even a low time pilot can if he uses the correct technique fly safely after a major failure of the attitude system.
As for flight with only the TC, I was quite surprised how well a student go mine performed when during training the vac pump failed, the controler reverted to no gyro procedures and the student piloted the aircraft to minima on a PAR.
The student was at the end of his IMC course and was an above average student but it proved that even a low time pilot can if he uses the correct technique fly safely after a major failure of the attitude system.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PiperBoy
You are a good IMC pilot when it takes so little effort to fly IMC in cloud that you can fly instruments while thinking about what you are going to be doing with the wife and family at the weekend or where your tension levels are the same in or out of cloud.
You should be so comfortable flying instruments that it takes up so little of your brain power to do so that you can multi task in the cockpit.
at that point a failure of anything is easier to deal with than if your IMC flying starts as a tense situation requiring a lot of effort at best of times and any failure or problem then builds on that tense background to your IMC flying
As for Hard IMC do you mean cloud bases at or near the minima for an instrument approach ? The fact that you do not get on top for the whole duration or that you are challenged by weather while flying in IMC?
Pace
You are a good IMC pilot when it takes so little effort to fly IMC in cloud that you can fly instruments while thinking about what you are going to be doing with the wife and family at the weekend or where your tension levels are the same in or out of cloud.
You should be so comfortable flying instruments that it takes up so little of your brain power to do so that you can multi task in the cockpit.
at that point a failure of anything is easier to deal with than if your IMC flying starts as a tense situation requiring a lot of effort at best of times and any failure or problem then builds on that tense background to your IMC flying
As for Hard IMC do you mean cloud bases at or near the minima for an instrument approach ? The fact that you do not get on top for the whole duration or that you are challenged by weather while flying in IMC?
Pace
You are a good IMC pilot when it takes so little effort to fly IMC in cloud that you can fly instruments while thinking about what you are going to be doing with the wife and family at the weekend or where your tension levels are the same in or out of cloud.
G
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's all about currency and practice. I'm pretty rusty at the present so flying partial panel would be no picnic. However in training you have to faff about with compass watch and TC, in the real world you'll usually have a GPS for heading and track which makes life much easier.
So you can use the turn coordinator for keeping the wings in the right attitude, the altimeter and VSI for pitch and the GPS for heading/track which isn't too hard.
So you can use the turn coordinator for keeping the wings in the right attitude, the altimeter and VSI for pitch and the GPS for heading/track which isn't too hard.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kent
Age: 61
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It depends on the situation and who is with me...
I regularly used to take "Cloud Climbs" in my glider, which only had one gyro instrument - an electric T&S. However:
In a single engine powered aircraft it depends...
First question is whether the aircraft can be handled in such a way that it won't exceed Vne in the event of loss of all the gyros. For example a Cessna 182 can be configured to fly hands off in a stable descending turn.
Second question is "Who is with me?". If I have passengers my envelope shrinks.
Third question is "How high is cloud base?".
Basically, taking the above into account, I will go IMC with only one operating gyro provided there is high probability of walking away if it fails (not saying the aircraft will be in a fit state for the next punter however).
This thread does, however, remind me of a time (when much less experienced) that I flew back from Cumbernauld to Denham - the first couple of hours (after climbing through a hole) were "VFR on top". When I got back someone indicated they thought this somewhat foolhardy - as there were definitely examples of "embedded towering cumulo granitus", which I would surely have found had the engine stopped. That thought had never occurred to me - lesson learned.
OC619
I regularly used to take "Cloud Climbs" in my glider, which only had one gyro instrument - an electric T&S. However:
- I was entering the base of a cloud - so I knew cloud base was well clear of the ground
- The glider had truly speed limiting airbrakes (i.e. speed limiting in vertical dive)
- I always had the option to spin it (thus avoiding Vne) and recover once clear of cloud (see first point)
In a single engine powered aircraft it depends...
First question is whether the aircraft can be handled in such a way that it won't exceed Vne in the event of loss of all the gyros. For example a Cessna 182 can be configured to fly hands off in a stable descending turn.
Second question is "Who is with me?". If I have passengers my envelope shrinks.
Third question is "How high is cloud base?".
Basically, taking the above into account, I will go IMC with only one operating gyro provided there is high probability of walking away if it fails (not saying the aircraft will be in a fit state for the next punter however).
This thread does, however, remind me of a time (when much less experienced) that I flew back from Cumbernauld to Denham - the first couple of hours (after climbing through a hole) were "VFR on top". When I got back someone indicated they thought this somewhat foolhardy - as there were definitely examples of "embedded towering cumulo granitus", which I would surely have found had the engine stopped. That thought had never occurred to me - lesson learned.
OC619
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Faversham
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surprisingly good back - up?
Happy to fly with single "official" source, but have surprisingly good back - up with Garmin 496.
The instrument page gives all you need to continue, as long as you remember that everything is GPS - derived, particularly height.
Important point is before you commence flight you need to have it turned on and programmed with route, and then scroll through each page, accepting info by "enter" on instrument page and terrain page. You don't want to have to start scrolling and accepting after the vacuum falls over and you are in the midst of weather.
The instrument page gives all you need to continue, as long as you remember that everything is GPS - derived, particularly height.
Important point is before you commence flight you need to have it turned on and programmed with route, and then scroll through each page, accepting info by "enter" on instrument page and terrain page. You don't want to have to start scrolling and accepting after the vacuum falls over and you are in the midst of weather.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually many people find limited panel easier than full panel - less to scan. I think the question here is more about flying with only one SOURCE for the instruments, the problem being of course that if that source fails you have little left.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Curly tips
Here's an interesting article about using the 496 ( I have a panel mounted one in my plane) as a "six pack" written with the guy designed the software for garmin
http://www.pinellaspilots.org/files/garmin-sixpack.pdf
Foxmouth, the one source issue is what I was referring to, I just think that I have too much reliance on one pump and one AI and would hate to attempt or be forced to fly partial panel getting tossed around in a cell, I figure my life is worth me splurging on this RCA 2600-3 SERIES DIGITAL ATTITUDE GYROS from Aircraft Spruce
And as soon as UK customs get done raping me on the import duties it will be installed on the plane, it's lightweight , solid state, and I,m putting a battery backup on it. Overkill perhaps , but if it helps me in a squeeze it's worth it
Here's an interesting article about using the 496 ( I have a panel mounted one in my plane) as a "six pack" written with the guy designed the software for garmin
http://www.pinellaspilots.org/files/garmin-sixpack.pdf
Foxmouth, the one source issue is what I was referring to, I just think that I have too much reliance on one pump and one AI and would hate to attempt or be forced to fly partial panel getting tossed around in a cell, I figure my life is worth me splurging on this RCA 2600-3 SERIES DIGITAL ATTITUDE GYROS from Aircraft Spruce
And as soon as UK customs get done raping me on the import duties it will be installed on the plane, it's lightweight , solid state, and I,m putting a battery backup on it. Overkill perhaps , but if it helps me in a squeeze it's worth it
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depends a bit what you mean by partial panel - normally you have one source for AI and a different one for turn indicator. Failure of one system thus leaves you with a decent roll indication and should be no great problem for someone trained and current, as I say, many find it easier as you have less of a scan to do and in training you often find student fly better on limited panel than full because of it. Single source, as can happen on home built scan mean you lose ALL basic roll indications, that really makes life difficult, and I would not fancy that in real life!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Faversham
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Piperboy
Great article about the Garmin. Never seen before but confirms everything I self - taught. Will read again a few times!
My 496 sits on the yoke mount with remote antenna sat under middle of windscreen - has never gone offline.
Great article about the Garmin. Never seen before but confirms everything I self - taught. Will read again a few times!
My 496 sits on the yoke mount with remote antenna sat under middle of windscreen - has never gone offline.
The problem with real world one vacuum pump IMC is that when the pump fails the gyro starts to wind down which then causes it to gently roll over with you of course initially following it.
This means that you first indication something is wrong is when the there is disagreement between the instruments which will initially cause confusion and by then you are almost certainly in a unusual attitude which means you first action will have to be an unusual attitude recovery
I had this scenario happen in IMC on a bumpy day in a C 172. The fact that this airplane was so forgiving made the outcome OK but the initial transition was very ugly and I am convinced if I had been in a High performance SEP I probably would not have survived.
The take away for me was that all the partial panel training I did in no way prepared me for the shock and mental confusion of instruments not agreeing.
From that day on I have never flown an aircraft that did not have dual vacuum pumps in actual IMC. The best set up IMO is a dual vacuum pump set up plus a standby electric AI
This means that you first indication something is wrong is when the there is disagreement between the instruments which will initially cause confusion and by then you are almost certainly in a unusual attitude which means you first action will have to be an unusual attitude recovery
I had this scenario happen in IMC on a bumpy day in a C 172. The fact that this airplane was so forgiving made the outcome OK but the initial transition was very ugly and I am convinced if I had been in a High performance SEP I probably would not have survived.
The take away for me was that all the partial panel training I did in no way prepared me for the shock and mental confusion of instruments not agreeing.
From that day on I have never flown an aircraft that did not have dual vacuum pumps in actual IMC. The best set up IMO is a dual vacuum pump set up plus a standby electric AI
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've had an AI and DI go tits in IMC. Vac pump went on strike and the AI toppled. Not a great problem really but I practise a lot. If I'm off somewhere with a mate in vmc and I'm flying a leg I'll get him to be safety lookout while I go head down for twenty minutes or so. I enjoy flying on instruments (I know, weird).
The worst scenario is to have an AI that isn't erecting as fast as it should and not noticing that the TC and AI are telling different stories. I've had that a few times, get level on the AI and wonder why you're slowly turning.
The worst scenario is to have an AI that isn't erecting as fast as it should and not noticing that the TC and AI are telling different stories. I've had that a few times, get level on the AI and wonder why you're slowly turning.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: South-East, United Kingdom
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I might also suggest using the autopilot on a basic wings level mode for a while (so long as you can trust it and you know it's in good working order).
I fly a IFR equipped PA28 with no backup equipment (except the GNS430 for navigation purposes), but if I had an AI failure in IMC I'd be keen to get out of it ASAP. It's OK to use the DI and the Altimeter for straight and level, but trying to chase the VSI is something I think you have to avoid doing, and in my opinion using the T/C for long periods of time is a recipe for disaster (though actually maybe the longer you spend getting used to it in IMC the better you will cope with it's waywardness).
I have had an AI go before, and a DI, though not together, and not in IMC luckily, so I am a little sceptical about any kind of hard IMC. Plus my total IMC hours over 7 or 8 years is not particularly high and I tend to fly IMC when there is a relatively high cloud base to be on the safe side.
I fly a IFR equipped PA28 with no backup equipment (except the GNS430 for navigation purposes), but if I had an AI failure in IMC I'd be keen to get out of it ASAP. It's OK to use the DI and the Altimeter for straight and level, but trying to chase the VSI is something I think you have to avoid doing, and in my opinion using the T/C for long periods of time is a recipe for disaster (though actually maybe the longer you spend getting used to it in IMC the better you will cope with it's waywardness).
I have had an AI go before, and a DI, though not together, and not in IMC luckily, so I am a little sceptical about any kind of hard IMC. Plus my total IMC hours over 7 or 8 years is not particularly high and I tend to fly IMC when there is a relatively high cloud base to be on the safe side.
This is good advice if you have a basic wing leveler single axis autopilot which gets its information from the turn coordinator. More advanced autopilots get their information from the AI so turning it on if the AI fails is just going to make matters worse.
Well all I can say is that in the very dim and distant past, when Pontious was a pilot, we taught IF in Chipmunks. That meant, on a dark and dismal Yorkshire November day, we climbed above cloud (base 600 ft) and taught IF straight & level. Then we did 5 minutes of aeros to replace the boredom (remember most of us QFIs were not long off big boy fast jets). Then were recovered back to base (still a 600 ft cloud base) with no PAR/GCA, Sat Nav or ILS, just an old ACR7 approach. No attitude indicator either as we did not have any spare time to fly straight and level for ages to allow the AI to erect. So T/S and a DI only with a fair bit of icing to think about.
An accident waiting to happen? Never.
An accident waiting to happen? Never.