Awaiting issue of PPL(A)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awaiting issue of PPL(A)
Just passed my skills test and submitted the application to CAA for issue of PPL(A). All the documentation is complete and signed off. Can I go solo while waiting for the licence to arrive and carry a passenger with me? I am told that it might take 3-4 weeks before the licence arrives.
Congratulations on passing your Test.
No.Your new Licence is not valid until you have it in youir posession, and have signed it.
You can fly solo under the supervision of your Flight Instructor in the meantime, but not with passengers.
MJ
Can I go solo while waiting for the licence to arrive and carry a passenger with me?
You can fly solo under the supervision of your Flight Instructor in the meantime, but not with passengers.
MJ
Last edited by Mach Jump; 20th Apr 2014 at 06:05.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congratulations on passing your test, and welcome to Pprune!
As mentioned, you have to have the bit of paper in your hand.
The reason? Although the flying school/examiner/you will have checked all the paperwork before submitting it, there are an amazing number of applications that get rejected at first application because something is wrong! (issues include exams out of validity, medicals, wrong signatures, forgetting certified id, cheques bouncing, etc)
As a courtesy, we waive all instructor fees for solo flight while students are awaiting their "bit of paper". So they can go solo, but they can't take a passenger for a few weeks.
Might be worth asking if your school does the same?
And come and visit us sometime.
As mentioned, you have to have the bit of paper in your hand.
The reason? Although the flying school/examiner/you will have checked all the paperwork before submitting it, there are an amazing number of applications that get rejected at first application because something is wrong! (issues include exams out of validity, medicals, wrong signatures, forgetting certified id, cheques bouncing, etc)
As a courtesy, we waive all instructor fees for solo flight while students are awaiting their "bit of paper". So they can go solo, but they can't take a passenger for a few weeks.
Might be worth asking if your school does the same?
And come and visit us sometime.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congrats on passing the skills test! Don't be too eager, the license will come soon enough (don't forget to sign it...). Use this bit of time to get the grin off your face otherwise your pax will think you are barking.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you sure it will arrive ?
Well done on passing the PPL course but the hardest part may be yet to come !
In the past I have had the CAA FCL department.......
Misplace my CPL exam results resulting in the two week delay in getting the results.
Fail to issue a new ATPL ( because my medical certificate was too new!) and then take five weeks to finally get around to doing anything about it.
Send me some guys new IMC rating.
On the whole the pilot part of FCL is the worst part of an otherwise quite good organization.
In the past I have had the CAA FCL department.......
Misplace my CPL exam results resulting in the two week delay in getting the results.
Fail to issue a new ATPL ( because my medical certificate was too new!) and then take five weeks to finally get around to doing anything about it.
Send me some guys new IMC rating.
On the whole the pilot part of FCL is the worst part of an otherwise quite good organization.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Unna, Germany
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a courtesy, we waive all instructor fees for solo flight while students are awaiting their "bit of paper". So they can go solo, but they can't take a passenger for a few weeks.
Might be worth asking if your school does the same?
Might be worth asking if your school does the same?
What used to happen is that the instructor would give him a flight authorisation such that he could return to the base - which is in effect what you are doing. However on one instance, the newly fledged PPL made a poor landing on return from his Skills Test, damaged the plane quite severely and the insurance refused to pay because the pilot was not in possession of a licence nor was he a student......
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the pilot was not in possession of a licence nor was he a student......
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK,
Don't believe in p*ssing insurance companies around, although to "name and shame" Halifax/Bank of Scotland/Lloyds TSB/TSB have done that to me after a hangar fire caused by our neighbour.
However, student does lots of training, passes exams and GFT, sends off paperwork.
If paperwork wrong, then they are still a student. So covered as a student.
If paperwork correct, then they are still a student until it is issued - because they are not a licensed pilot (where is your licence, sir/madam?)
If licence issued, they might still be a student. Training is now required - and has always been advised - after licence issue. Not all training is dual. So still a student?
Ultimately, as I say, I don't like to p off our insurers. For claims we have made - rather than making off other people's insurers - they have been excellent. And we like to make sure we are fully covered. It costs, though!
So we are actually covered in the policy whether or not the person is a student.
To that extent, where we are concerned, the above is therefore irrelevant.
But BUYER BEWARE!
Even if you are a basic student or experienced renter make sure there is valid insurance in place at all times.
Don't believe in p*ssing insurance companies around, although to "name and shame" Halifax/Bank of Scotland/Lloyds TSB/TSB have done that to me after a hangar fire caused by our neighbour.
However, student does lots of training, passes exams and GFT, sends off paperwork.
If paperwork wrong, then they are still a student. So covered as a student.
If paperwork correct, then they are still a student until it is issued - because they are not a licensed pilot (where is your licence, sir/madam?)
If licence issued, they might still be a student. Training is now required - and has always been advised - after licence issue. Not all training is dual. So still a student?
Ultimately, as I say, I don't like to p off our insurers. For claims we have made - rather than making off other people's insurers - they have been excellent. And we like to make sure we are fully covered. It costs, though!
So we are actually covered in the policy whether or not the person is a student.
To that extent, where we are concerned, the above is therefore irrelevant.
But BUYER BEWARE!
Even if you are a basic student or experienced renter make sure there is valid insurance in place at all times.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Unna, Germany
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is nothing in the ANO that says a pilot ceases to be a student as soon as they have passed their skills test.
A student signs up to gain his PPL. Once he has passed the PPL, the contract between him and the school where he was learning has been fulfilled, the student is therefore no longer a student (simplistically speaking although we know he could still learn more.) However you are going to continue calling him a student until his licence arrives.
If you are to deem this person to be a student, then - and here I think you will agree with me - the ANO does specifically state that a STUDENT PILOT (and this is what you are calling him) MAY NOT carry any passengers with him when solo.
Please note the original post was asking to carry a passenger with him hence my statement about legality.....
The insurance side of things is another aspect I was also pointing out and I would ALWAYS want to ensure that I am ensured when flying because the insurer might not take too lightly to a "student" who has passed his test being allowed to fly on insurance as a student rather than as a newly qualified pilot - to them, it's all about risk management and premiums.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to FCL.045 a pilot with a valid Licence must always carry it with them (plus medical, plus photo ID) when exercising that Licence's privilege(s) (ie flying an aircraft).
Someone who does not have a valid Licence must be a student and they can only fly solo if authorised, and supervised, by an FI (using their privilege FCL.905.FI (a))
However I would be unsure of the wisdom of authorising someone to fly solo back from their PPL Skill Test (generally driving instructors don't let candidates drive back from a driving test) - too many emotions possible.
Even a Licenced pilot will probably be a student again at some point (revision, rating renewal, new rating, etc) but, as they hold a valid Licence, then an FI's privilege FCL.095.FI (a) no longer applies. There has been a long discussion previously on this forum on whether/or not a valid Licence holder with an expired Rating can be authorised to go solo and, if so, by whom. (I hold that it is not possible).
Someone who does not have a valid Licence must be a student and they can only fly solo if authorised, and supervised, by an FI (using their privilege FCL.905.FI (a))
However I would be unsure of the wisdom of authorising someone to fly solo back from their PPL Skill Test (generally driving instructors don't let candidates drive back from a driving test) - too many emotions possible.
Even a Licenced pilot will probably be a student again at some point (revision, rating renewal, new rating, etc) but, as they hold a valid Licence, then an FI's privilege FCL.095.FI (a) no longer applies. There has been a long discussion previously on this forum on whether/or not a valid Licence holder with an expired Rating can be authorised to go solo and, if so, by whom. (I hold that it is not possible).
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steve,
You were the one mentioning an instructor signing off a student for a solo xc to reach the venue for their GFT.
It is not something we would do.
First, we would rather the student to be "fresh" for their test, so en-route weather etc would not be a worry.
Second, how could they then have a beer afterwards!
I think we all agree: no passengers until after paperwork issued.
We may disagree, for an ab initio student, can they be a solo sign-off until then.
You were the one mentioning an instructor signing off a student for a solo xc to reach the venue for their GFT.
It is not something we would do.
First, we would rather the student to be "fresh" for their test, so en-route weather etc would not be a worry.
Second, how could they then have a beer afterwards!
I think we all agree: no passengers until after paperwork issued.
We may disagree, for an ab initio student, can they be a solo sign-off until then.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 71
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A student has a signed flight authorisation from his instructor to fly to the
location where his examiner is waiting for him.
TCF
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I'm not sure I agree.
Surely the flight to the examiner is not going to be a challenging x-country, but most likely a short positioning flight via a very familiar route to and from a very familiar airfield. And by the time a candidate is ready for a PPL exam, the outcome of the exam (a pass) should already be 99% sure. In that respect, the risks associated with it are minimal. Far less than the QXC, for instance.
But at the same time it may have enormous psychological benefits. Before and during the initial positioning flight you have already done a pre-flight, runup and flown the aircraft. It's working, and you've setup the radios and such exactly the way you want it. Nobody has touched the aircraft after you landed. You then collect the examiner, and can do the supervised preflight in the knowledge that the aircraft is OK. In fact, you'll probably have far more confidence and mental capacity to treat the examiner as a passenger than if this is your first flight in this aircraft today, and you have no idea in what state the previous student left it.
All that may continue through the rest of the flight. So I think the psychological advantage of just having done a solo flight (a short x-country even) to pick up the examiner may have tremendous benefits.
Obviously as the instructor signing out the student, I'd insist on receiving a call once the exam is over, and making sure the candidate had at least half an hour to an hour rest before the flight home. Just so that the adrenaline could wear off. And in the very unlikely event that the candidate failed, you can still sign him out to fly home on a student licence. (Which needs to be done in case of a pass too, because by then the licence will not have arrived back from the CAA yet.) Or, if he's not up to it, drive over and fly the plane yourself while the student drives your car back.
Surely the flight to the examiner is not going to be a challenging x-country, but most likely a short positioning flight via a very familiar route to and from a very familiar airfield. And by the time a candidate is ready for a PPL exam, the outcome of the exam (a pass) should already be 99% sure. In that respect, the risks associated with it are minimal. Far less than the QXC, for instance.
But at the same time it may have enormous psychological benefits. Before and during the initial positioning flight you have already done a pre-flight, runup and flown the aircraft. It's working, and you've setup the radios and such exactly the way you want it. Nobody has touched the aircraft after you landed. You then collect the examiner, and can do the supervised preflight in the knowledge that the aircraft is OK. In fact, you'll probably have far more confidence and mental capacity to treat the examiner as a passenger than if this is your first flight in this aircraft today, and you have no idea in what state the previous student left it.
All that may continue through the rest of the flight. So I think the psychological advantage of just having done a solo flight (a short x-country even) to pick up the examiner may have tremendous benefits.
Obviously as the instructor signing out the student, I'd insist on receiving a call once the exam is over, and making sure the candidate had at least half an hour to an hour rest before the flight home. Just so that the adrenaline could wear off. And in the very unlikely event that the candidate failed, you can still sign him out to fly home on a student licence. (Which needs to be done in case of a pass too, because by then the licence will not have arrived back from the CAA yet.) Or, if he's not up to it, drive over and fly the plane yourself while the student drives your car back.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 71
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I'm not sure I agree.
You cannot say, with 100% certainty, that your student will pass the Skills Test. If the student should fail the test and remedial training is recommended by the examiner, are you really going to authorise his/her solo return to your operating airfield?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, it would depend of course. But the instructor has, in the past, already signed out this student for a first solo, a XC solo, a QXC and possibly a few other "firsts". So a short positioning flight should not pose a problem.
The most important consideration, IMHO, would be the frame of mind the student is in, after having failed the skills test. That's why I would insist on a phonecall after the exam, regardless of the outcome.
But technically speaking, if the student is ready for his skills test, then a short positioning flight should not be a problem at all.
And you can also look at it the other way. If the student passes the skills test, then by law he is entitled to circumnavigate the world, without any further training at all. That's what the instructor supposedly prepared him for. So if the instructor is not confident the student can do a short positioning flight on his own, then it's the instructor who should be failed.
The most important consideration, IMHO, would be the frame of mind the student is in, after having failed the skills test. That's why I would insist on a phonecall after the exam, regardless of the outcome.
But technically speaking, if the student is ready for his skills test, then a short positioning flight should not be a problem at all.
And you can also look at it the other way. If the student passes the skills test, then by law he is entitled to circumnavigate the world, without any further training at all. That's what the instructor supposedly prepared him for. So if the instructor is not confident the student can do a short positioning flight on his own, then it's the instructor who should be failed.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You cannot say, with 100% certainty, that your student will pass the Skills Test. If the student should fail the test and remedial training is recommended by the examiner, are you really going to authorise his/her solo return to your operating airfield?
The only real risk I see with letting him fly back solo again after failure is the psychological state. He's probably sad and concentration might not be optimal in such situation.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
International flight regulations are strict and that since foundation of ICAO. No, as long as you do not have your physical license in hands, you are not allowed to fly.
It is always the same discussion on exam as well and everybody knows the problem. You are allowed to give your student flight authorization to fly to a remote airfield for examination, but the moment the examiner declared him pilot, the student is grounded until he receives the license physically. You can cry, you can howl to the moon, believe in the strangeness of this, but it is fact and known since a long time.
In all international flight regulations you are promoted pilot by the declaration of the examiner, independent of the paper of a license. If you are a pilot, you have to carry your license. If you don't, you can't fly. It has a reason this has been settled like this and you are not the one to change this part of the world.
I always thought that it is a real bad habit to start the career as a pilot with the illegal solo flight back home after exam on flight authorization of your former trainer. When I did my exam I received a flight authorization from the examiner, which I did not question, but it felt a little less illegal compared to the authorization from the ATO.
It is always the same discussion on exam as well and everybody knows the problem. You are allowed to give your student flight authorization to fly to a remote airfield for examination, but the moment the examiner declared him pilot, the student is grounded until he receives the license physically. You can cry, you can howl to the moon, believe in the strangeness of this, but it is fact and known since a long time.
In all international flight regulations you are promoted pilot by the declaration of the examiner, independent of the paper of a license. If you are a pilot, you have to carry your license. If you don't, you can't fly. It has a reason this has been settled like this and you are not the one to change this part of the world.
I always thought that it is a real bad habit to start the career as a pilot with the illegal solo flight back home after exam on flight authorization of your former trainer. When I did my exam I received a flight authorization from the examiner, which I did not question, but it felt a little less illegal compared to the authorization from the ATO.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 40
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ChickenHouse
You aren't going to send the student on an International flight so I'm not sure what international regulations have got to do with it. Surely the international regs only apply once a licence has been received.
In the UK at least (and I suspect - the rest of Europe) an examiner doesn't declare you a pilot. The authorities do after all paperwork is completed and you receive a licence through the post.
My memory is that under EASA a student has to now carry a copy of their authorisation. Does that mean that the examiner has to sign it on behalf of / as the instructor? Or does the student get the authorisation before they leave home base?
I know that straight after the skills test (which I passed) I wasn't in a fit state to drive, never mind fly for several hours after completion with head spinning. A skills test is an intensive couple of hours...
You aren't going to send the student on an International flight so I'm not sure what international regulations have got to do with it. Surely the international regs only apply once a licence has been received.
In the UK at least (and I suspect - the rest of Europe) an examiner doesn't declare you a pilot. The authorities do after all paperwork is completed and you receive a licence through the post.
My memory is that under EASA a student has to now carry a copy of their authorisation. Does that mean that the examiner has to sign it on behalf of / as the instructor? Or does the student get the authorisation before they leave home base?
I know that straight after the skills test (which I passed) I wasn't in a fit state to drive, never mind fly for several hours after completion with head spinning. A skills test is an intensive couple of hours...
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The examiner only checks if you comply with the requirements of the skill test. If there is another issue (your theoretical certificate is invalid, whatever) you don't get your license. Without holding the paper in hand, you're not a licensed pilot. A school can send non-licensed pilots off for solo flights if they can perform them safely. If something happens, the school is responsible.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 71
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This subject has now gone into 'thread drift' by the engagement of 'Warp Drive'. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, however, the introduction of many 'if's and buts' doesn't/shouldn't sway opinion of good old common sense. Even if the student did pass his/her Skills Test it's not good practice to allow the euphoria of that event to, perhaps, thrust lack of concentration upon a newly qualified pilot to fly the aeroplane (solo) back to his/her airfield. It has been previously mentioned that a Driving School would not normally allow a newly qualified driver to drive the car after passing his/her driving test; for good reason! Psychological advantage has been quoted as being a good precursor to the Skills Test. I'd hasten to add that by authorising a return solo flight, immediately after the test, would be a psychological disadvantage in maintaining a modicum of safety and awareness. In my book that's called lack of 'Common Sense'!