Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Licence requirements for vintage aircraft over 5700kg MTOW

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Licence requirements for vintage aircraft over 5700kg MTOW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Apr 2014, 13:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chester (UK)
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Licence requirements for vintage aircraft over 5700kg MTOW

I post this here because none of the other sub-forums seem to fit, although answers might stray into CPL/ATPL territory.

My question is this: with a PPL and the appropriate experience + instruction I would be allowed to fly, for example, a Spitfire or P-51. But what is the regulatory situation when it comes to vintage aircraft that exceed the 5700kg MTOW limit (let's say a P-38)?

Does anyone know what licence a pilot would need for auch a machine (leaving aside for now the question whether it is a single- or multi-engined plane)? A CPL seems to be limited to 5700kg as well so would that mean an ATPL?
Der Rote Baron is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2014, 14:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,662
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
It is not necessary to have anything more than a PPL,apart from a `Type Rating Exemption` from the CAA,and after suitable training.If it is multi-engined,then one needs a ME rating.All `warbirds` are generally classed as `Annex 2`,they do not have a specific type rating,and usually operate on a `Permit to Fly`,irrespective of whether they are fixed or fling-wing,piston,or jet...
sycamore is online now  
Old 9th Apr 2014, 17:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South West UK
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since the advent of JAR over a decade ago the old 5,700Kg limit has disappeared. A Spitfire is an SEP(L) class aeroplane and you can fly it with a PPL, CPL or ATPL which includes a valid SEP(L) rating so long as you have the relevant differences signed off. That means Tailwheel, VP Prop, Retractable and Supercharged engines (Also pressurisation if you are flying some later marks).

There is no requirement for a "type rating exemption" unless flying an aeroplane which would normally require a type rating; that means a jet or a multi crew aircraft type.

A multi engined warbird such as the P38 or a mosquito (I wish!) would require an MEP rating.

That's the legal answer but of course considerable training would also be required to satisfy both the owner and his insurance company!

Happy landings

3 Point
3 Point is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2014, 23:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Also check the Conditions attached to the CAA Permit to Fly, as they will almost certainly include a condition requiring the aircraft to be operated in accordance with an Operational Control Manual (OCM) aproved by the Authority.

The OCM will specify who can fly the aircraft, and what qualifications, training, or experience they require.

https://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP632.PDF


MJ

Last edited by Mach Jump; 9th Apr 2014 at 23:54. Reason: Added CAP632 reference.
Mach Jump is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2014, 02:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not where I want to be
Posts: 520
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Differences.

@3 Point

Interested to see you have a 'difference' for superchargers there.

Here in Godzone we have type ratings for nearly everything but have general differences training for tail-wheel, wobbly prop, multi-engine, retractable and gas turbine. I don't recall anything specific for super or turbo charging, perhaps that's just anticipated in being covered in the type rating.

I don't think there's anything for over 5700kg either, although again I suppose that's captured in the individual rating. Certainly I flew a vintage warbird on a PPL (and later CPL) with just the type rating [having the requisite tail, multi, retract, and wobbly already].

FP.
First_Principal is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2014, 21:06
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chester (UK)
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks

Many thanks to everyone for the extremely useful information. That is fantastic news indeed and fills a host of gaps in my aviation knowledge. This is a truly great platform for anyone interested in flying.
Der Rote Baron is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.