PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 8th Apr 2012, 12:42   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 43
Quick MSA question

Preparing for the IMC ground exam and here's a sample question I came across:

Quote:
Qn: In the UK, what is the lowest IFR minimum safety altitude (MSA) you are likely to encounter?

Ans: 1800 ft
I haven't come across any material discussing the 1800 ft figure above.

Does anyone know why the answer should be 1800 ft? I would have thought that the answer would be 1100 ft - 100ft being the lowest possible MEF, and 1000 ft of additional clearance required above that.
RedKnight is offline   Reply
Old 8th Apr 2012, 13:00   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,202
Wouldn't you need to add 300' for any unknown obstacles?

(That only gets you to 1300', I know.)
BackPacker is online now   Reply
Old 8th Apr 2012, 14:23   #3 (permalink)

I'd rather be floating

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England
Posts: 2,539
Ground elevation at 499' doesn't show any different from 0' on the map, and obstacles at 299' are not shown.

So there could be a hill at 499' with a 299' mast on it, nothing on the map to indicate either, and you need to be 1000' above the mast.

500 + 300 + 1000 = 1800
Gertrude the Wombat is online now   Reply
Old 8th Apr 2012, 14:24   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Age: 25
Posts: 95
If I remember rightly from my IMC, it's because on a UK VFR chart terrain below 500ft is not marked and obstacles that are less than 300ft AGL are not always marked (some are).

So theoretically you could have a 495ft high hill with a 295ft high mast sat on it and neither would be marked on the chart. This gives you 790ft, add 1000ft to that, round it up and you get the 1800ft figure.

I think that's right! Happy to be corrected if not.

Edit: D'oh, beaten to it!!
gg190 is offline   Reply
Old 8th Apr 2012, 14:41   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 43
That's very helpful, thank you.
RedKnight is offline   Reply
Old 8th Apr 2012, 15:06   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 29
Posts: 459
Could this be less over the sea?
riverrock83 is offline   Reply
Old 8th Apr 2012, 15:49   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Middle England
Posts: 130
Wow - great answers.

river - As for the sea (sorry!), I'd stick with the land MSA at 1800'. Cruise ships can get up to nearly 300 feet above the waves and as for those offshore windmilly things, some of them off the coast of east Anglia are starting to get about 500 feet.
2high2fastagain is offline   Reply
Old 8th Apr 2012, 17:05   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A Big Yellow Teapot
Posts: 1,195
As far as I'm aware sea level tends to sit at around sea level......
thing is offline   Reply
Old 8th Apr 2012, 19:08   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,874
What about Oil Rigs? they can be up to 700ft Height!

The MEF in the square containing Great Yarmouth is 400 so the MSA is 1400ft.
Whopity is online now   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 20:18.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".