Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

longest c152 flight?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

longest c152 flight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Nov 2011, 18:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In a hole somewhere
Age: 46
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
longest c152 flight?

Hi All,
New one... Just for fun, whos been where as pic in a c152 (obviously long distance)
Pilot.Lyons is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2011, 18:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,209
Received 134 Likes on 61 Posts
Well after about 1 hour my butt tends to get sore in a C 152 so I try hard to keep the flights short. However when I was a young instructor one of my students wanted to build night time hours. He flew a solo triangle round robin route with a total nonstop flight time of 7.4 hours
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2011, 19:17
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In a hole somewhere
Age: 46
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ouch sore butt

My skills test seemed ok but i did get out an have a coffee twice!
Pilot.Lyons is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2011, 19:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK, mainly
Age: 39
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tend to stick to under 3 hours before my back cries enough... Usually IF with trips that length though, so a lot of time spent in the cruise. Most people can't get a C152 near its real endurance anyway, without understanding of quoted POH performance and leaning technique!
madlandrover is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2011, 20:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not me and not a 152 (its a 150 instead) ...BUT

have a look at G-AWAW RESTORATION.

I helped pack up whats left of AWAW at Wroughton Science Museum to send her off to the USA and met Janette. A wonderful lady and UK to Darwin single handed has got to be the longest trip that we will find (unless you know better)
avonflyer is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2011, 20:18
  #6 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,618
Received 63 Likes on 44 Posts
C 150:

Central Ontario to:

Bahamas, return,
Mexican border at Texas, return, and,
Edmonton, return
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2011, 15:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I take my hat off to you guys. I have to lean to the right in a 152 as there's not enough room for my shoulders when the door is closed. Two up, well you get to be real friendly with the passenger.........
thing is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2011, 20:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went to places like Morocco, Prague, Poland etc in mine.
S-Works is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2011, 21:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He flew a solo triangle round robin route with a total nonstop flight time of 7.4 hours
Where I learned to fly we were specifically forbidden (through the flying order book) to plan non-stop/unrefueled flights longer than 2.5 hours. For the PA28 and C172 exceptions were occasionally made (after a careful check of the plog/fuel plan), but not for the C152.

I'm very surprised that the C152 can have an endurance of 7.4 hours (I presume long-range tanks?) but even more so that an instructor would sign a student out to actually do these kinds of flights. At night even.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2011, 21:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: europe
Age: 49
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7 hrs 20 mins on a photographic/survey sortie quite a few years ago. Need a plane with a toilet nowadays!
chubbychopper is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2011, 22:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northants
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Every flight in a 152 seemed to last forever.....
jecuk is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2011, 23:54
  #12 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,618
Received 63 Likes on 44 Posts
Every flight in a 152 seemed to last forever.....
Oh yes! One of the many charms of the 150, the fun seems to last longer! I'd fly the Viking, spend a whole bunch of money on gas, and the flight seemed to be over before you could begin to enjoy it!
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 01:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,209
Received 134 Likes on 61 Posts
Originally Posted by BackPacker
Where I learned to fly we were specifically forbidden (through the flying order book) to plan non-stop/unrefueled flights longer than 2.5 hours. For the PA28 and C172 exceptions were occasionally made (after a careful check of the plog/fuel plan), but not for the C152.

I'm very surprised that the C152 can have an endurance of 7.4 hours (I presume long-range tanks?) but even more so that an instructor would sign a student out to actually do these kinds of flights. At night even.

The student was building time for his CPL. The C 152 POH shows it has ,with long range tanks, over 8 hours endurance at 45 % power with a 45 min reserve. In this case he landed with a solid hour of fuel at normal cruise still in the tanks. As for signing out the student it was a CAVU night and he did several laps of the triangle (about 150 nm total distance) before landing so he was never far away from his home airport or several other available airports. Personally I though he was crazy, but I guess when you are 20 years old 7.4 hrs in C152 sounds like an adventure.

I find your note about restricting all flights to 2.5 hours sad. You are basically saying flight planning doesn't mean anything, Just fill it up use any power setting you want, don't bother leaning out, and our super safe rule means you can never run out of gas. So just when is the pilot supposed to learn about fuel planning? When he is flying his own airplane with passengers ? on his first day as a commercial pilot ?
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 06:29
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Upper Levels
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a 2, but a 0

Transatlantic Cessna 150
Robert Jan is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 07:28
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In a hole somewhere
Age: 46
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow!

What more can i say? Thats epic! (and crazy!)
Pilot.Lyons is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 07:33
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find your note about restricting all flights to 2.5 hours sad. You are basically saying flight planning doesn't mean anything, Just fill it up use any power setting you want, don't bother leaning out, and our super safe rule means you can never run out of gas. So just when is the pilot supposed to learn about fuel planning? When he is flying his own airplane with passengers ? on his first day as a commercial pilot ?
This was a restriction applied to PPLs. Apparently (I have not checked the sums) a 152 with standard tanks, flown at a higher-than-normal cruise settings, unleaned (not uncommon in the PPL training world where you pay for the aircraft based on hobbs, not tacho) can be flown dry in a little over 3 hours. Maxing the flight duration to 2.5 hours gives you some reserve then.

And hey, 2.5 hours is enough for the PPL QXC.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 08:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The more general comment is that most people flying these things haven't got much of a clue as to the real range they have.

For starters, almost nobody in the UK is taught correct leaning, but there is a ~30% difference between full-rich, and ~ peak EGT which is a perfectly authorised cruise setting at/below 75% of max rated power.

The slackness with which fuel planning was done during my PPL training (basically, looking at the tech log to see how long the previous person flew) horrified me from the start. Whenever I went solo, I always filled right up. Sometimes I got a bollocking from the "CFI" for putting in only 20 litres, but it was better than doing a G-OMAR (google is your friend, as always) which happened rather less than a million miles away from where I was flying

If I owned a C152 I would install a fuel totaliser, immediately.
IO540 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 09:23
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South England
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
learn to lean?

Longest flight in a C152 - my skills test, so around 2 hours.

The more general comment is that most people flying these things haven't got much of a clue as to the real range they have.

For starters, almost nobody in the UK is taught correct leaning, but there is a ~30% difference between full-rich, and ~ peak EGT which is a perfectly authorised cruise setting at/below 75% of max rated power.
I completely agree - I was told during my training that the 'red lever' is only needed when you fly above 3000' and as all training was at or below that, the mixture control was only used at engine start and engine stop.

I have never leaned an engine, never had training how to do it, and as I rent 'wet' there is actually no financial incentive for me to fly economically. Am I doing any engine damage by not leaning? All my fuel calculations in a C152 are based on 6 gallons an hour.

Sounds like I could do with some leaning instruction.
SEP Flyer is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 09:36
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is actually no financial incentive for me to fly economically.
That's true but you are losing ~30% of your range, which may (or may not) make a big difference to where you can fly to with confidence.

Am I doing any engine damage by not leaning?
Not really, except bunging up the spark plugs with lead and other gunge...

Sounds like I could do with some leaning instruction.
This is really based around an engine fitted with a multicylinder temperature monitor but if you read through it, you will have an idea.

Without instrumentation, the method for correct-ish leaning is to set it all up in cruise, 75% of max rated power or less, and then slowly lean until there is a fairly sudden drop in power (or airspeed if you like). Then advance (enrich) the mixture back just a little, to the point before the sudden power drop.

Your engine might run a bit rough when the power drops off and that is normal; the same principle applies... enrich till the roughness disappears.
IO540 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2011, 09:50
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like I could do with some leaning instruction.
Absolutely. The best advice is probably contained in the POH so I suggest you start there. After all, if your instructor failed to teach you to lean properly during the PPL, what are the chances that he'll be able to teach you how to do things properly now?

But for a simple aircraft like a C152 (or basically any non-turbo carbureted Lycosaurus without sophisticated instrumentation) everything you need to know will probably come down to this:

- At any power settings above 75%, run full rich. But remember the engine cannot produce more than 75% power above 5000' DA.
- For best power mixture (e.g. full power climb above 5000' DA, or take-off from a high-altitude field), lean for best RPM.
- In the cruise, lean until the engine runs rough and enrich slightly to restore smooth running.
- Set full rich before any power change, lean afterwards. Do not attempt to make power changes with a leaned engine. In the circuit, where you will have a number of power changes, it's easiest to simply run full rich all the time.

Once the engine and instruments gets more sophisticated (constant speed prop, injectors, matched injectors, CGT, EGT, per-cylinder CGT/EGT, fuel flow meter, ...) leaning becomes progressively more sophisticated too.

Last edited by BackPacker; 29th Nov 2011 at 10:33.
BackPacker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.