Operating Cost for C150 or PA28?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Operating Cost for C150 or PA28?
Hi Guys,
Im looking for a rough guide to operating costs of a C150 and PA28 and have looked on google etc and cant find anything specific!
If anyone knows what the costs would be for insurance, maintenance, hourly fuel costs and CofA.
Any feedback greatly appreciated in advance
Im looking for a rough guide to operating costs of a C150 and PA28 and have looked on google etc and cant find anything specific!
If anyone knows what the costs would be for insurance, maintenance, hourly fuel costs and CofA.
Any feedback greatly appreciated in advance
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For my C150 roughly:
Insurance: €1100,-/year
Maintenance: it depends
Hourly fuel costs: Mogas 19l x €1.6= €30/hr, Avgas 19l x €2.3=€44/hr
CofA including 100hr check and avionics: €900,-
-Kees
Insurance: €1100,-/year
Maintenance: it depends
Hourly fuel costs: Mogas 19l x €1.6= €30/hr, Avgas 19l x €2.3=€44/hr
CofA including 100hr check and avionics: €900,-
-Kees
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True costs for a C150 based in South of U.K. over last 12 months:
Insurance £ 1,056.00
Radio Licence £ 20.00
Maintenance £ 3,267.92
Airport Fees £ 3,195.04
Plus fuel, say 21 litres per hour (actual burn usually less), and this covers pretty much all that you need except for the occasional litre of oil between changes.
Don't forget to allow for an engine fund towards the eventual replacement/refurbishment and remember that the airframe will need respraying about every ten years.
Insurance £ 1,056.00
Radio Licence £ 20.00
Maintenance £ 3,267.92
Airport Fees £ 3,195.04
Plus fuel, say 21 litres per hour (actual burn usually less), and this covers pretty much all that you need except for the occasional litre of oil between changes.
Don't forget to allow for an engine fund towards the eventual replacement/refurbishment and remember that the airframe will need respraying about every ten years.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What UV says.
Cost me £10000/yr PA28 181 Transport Cof A 250 hrs/yr plus fuel.
Two consecutive annuals cost £5500 & £4500 plus VAT. Insurance for club use £2100
Aircraft was 22 years old.
DO.
Cost me £10000/yr PA28 181 Transport Cof A 250 hrs/yr plus fuel.
Two consecutive annuals cost £5500 & £4500 plus VAT. Insurance for club use £2100
Aircraft was 22 years old.
DO.
Moderator
My Cessna 150M annual cost (Canadian $)
Insurance: $1600
hangar (free at home, but worth): $900
Annual Inspection: +-$1000
Annual recalibration of altimeter/txp $250
Mags: $100
Alternator: $75
Engine reserve: $500
Cosmetic reserve: $500
= $4925 fixed costs per year, plus +-$20 per hour Mogas and oil
So, if I fly 100 hours a year: $70 per hour total cost...
and worth every penny! The best plane I could hope to have, owned it for 23 years...
Pilot DAR
Insurance: $1600
hangar (free at home, but worth): $900
Annual Inspection: +-$1000
Annual recalibration of altimeter/txp $250
Mags: $100
Alternator: $75
Engine reserve: $500
Cosmetic reserve: $500
= $4925 fixed costs per year, plus +-$20 per hour Mogas and oil
So, if I fly 100 hours a year: $70 per hour total cost...
and worth every penny! The best plane I could hope to have, owned it for 23 years...
Pilot DAR
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cardiff
Age: 33
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
try a pa38
hi.
why not consider a pa38-112 tomahawk
it's a far more spacious aircraft compared to a 152 and much more rewarding to fly.
costs for a year
£1800 annual with radio etc
insurance for a PPL IMC with 160 hours £840
21 liters an hour
very reliable.
why not consider a pa38-112 tomahawk
it's a far more spacious aircraft compared to a 152 and much more rewarding to fly.
costs for a year
£1800 annual with radio etc
insurance for a PPL IMC with 160 hours £840
21 liters an hour
very reliable.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cessna 150L
Annual - last one cost £3900 but various parts were needed. This year (ARC renewal and annual/150 hr service should be under £1800)
50 hr checks - do them yourself, so just the cost of oil (+£50 for an engineer to oversee).
Insurance - £900 (2 named drivers plus any instructor/examiner) with Traffords
Fuel - 23 litres an hour seems to cover starts/taxy time/flying time
Hangarage - got my own so zero
Ongoing maintenence - pay for whatever goes wrong. Our costs have been £480. Engine - ditto.
Actual costs this year based on 110 hours is £48/hr
Annual - last one cost £3900 but various parts were needed. This year (ARC renewal and annual/150 hr service should be under £1800)
50 hr checks - do them yourself, so just the cost of oil (+£50 for an engineer to oversee).
Insurance - £900 (2 named drivers plus any instructor/examiner) with Traffords
Fuel - 23 litres an hour seems to cover starts/taxy time/flying time
Hangarage - got my own so zero
Ongoing maintenence - pay for whatever goes wrong. Our costs have been £480. Engine - ditto.
Actual costs this year based on 110 hours is £48/hr
Last edited by silvereagle; 25th Nov 2009 at 10:08. Reason: spelling
Moderator
I hope the
came with a well detailed description of the work accomplished. Sure sounds like a comprehensive amount to me - there must be an accompanying explanation!
Tomahawk is very good aircraft, as long as really short or rough runways aren't in your flying plans, and you get some conversion training in one. If someone has been traumatized in one of these aircraft, I would suggest it was a result of inadequate training or technique - not the plane itself. Different planes do have different characteristics, it's up to pilots to learn them well, then those pilots won't be traumatized. I know this because I checked myself out on that type, and should have sought training - good plane, foolish me!
Pilot DAR
£10,000+ bill
Tomahawk is very good aircraft, as long as really short or rough runways aren't in your flying plans, and you get some conversion training in one. If someone has been traumatized in one of these aircraft, I would suggest it was a result of inadequate training or technique - not the plane itself. Different planes do have different characteristics, it's up to pilots to learn them well, then those pilots won't be traumatized. I know this because I checked myself out on that type, and should have sought training - good plane, foolish me!
Pilot DAR
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North of the border
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C150 PA28 Running Costs
Looking at those bills seems like another good reason to dump Part M aircraft and go the LAA route.
At £5000/£10,000 for an Annual Inspection, barmy ! You would end up buying the aircraft again every three years. At those prices rent instead.
The figures just don't stack up.
Once the "Engineers" see their flock dwindling they will have to sit up and take notice.
Vote with your wings and ditch them, would you allow your car garage to fleece you in the same way ?
At £5000/£10,000 for an Annual Inspection, barmy ! You would end up buying the aircraft again every three years. At those prices rent instead.
The figures just don't stack up.
Once the "Engineers" see their flock dwindling they will have to sit up and take notice.
Vote with your wings and ditch them, would you allow your car garage to fleece you in the same way ?
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Based on a figure I saw elsewhere that Cessna 150's require an overhaul every 1,800 hours..
Other than the 'safety first' aspect, why is that the engines require such extensive work in such a short time? cf a car engine, which if serviced correctly will last 250k+ without issue.. Especially as I percieve aircraft engines to be less complicated than car engines, and rev a lot lower
Other than the 'safety first' aspect, why is that the engines require such extensive work in such a short time? cf a car engine, which if serviced correctly will last 250k+ without issue.. Especially as I percieve aircraft engines to be less complicated than car engines, and rev a lot lower
Moderator
The 1800 hour overhaul time on the O-200 (and similar for nearly all other such engines) is a manufacturer's recommended interval. In Canada, and other placed I'm sure, it is only mandatory for commercially operated engines. Private aircraft can operate "on condition". My O-200 went happily to more than 3600 hours (with some interm cylinder work). At that point, I opened it up because I found some ferrous metal in the filter, the source of which could not be confirmed. It turned out that the engine was magnificent inside, and it was only a crimped on cover on the alternator drive making the metel (which really had nothing whatever to do with the critical internal workings of the engine). If taken care of, those engines have an amazing life span, because, yes, run properly, they really don't work that hard compared to a modern car engine!
Pilot DAR
Pilot DAR
gyrotyro wrote........
I think you will find that it the real culprit of higher costs is directly down to the regulators...ie CAA and EASA
Once the "Engineers" see their flock dwindling they will have to sit up and take notice.
Last edited by Blink182; 27th Nov 2009 at 13:55.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1800 hours is the car equivalent of around 60,000 miles. If you remember cars with engines designed 40 years ago you'll recall that all sorts of maintenance was required to get them to go anything like 100k miles - and whilst you can get a car back on three cylinders, aircraft tend to take exception.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A few comments
The C150 may be cheap to buy but it has a bit of a sting in the tail with corrosion issues around the main landing gear support that can cost a lot to fix, the C152 may cost a little more to buy but it is a very "sorted" aircraft with few AD's and most of the C150 "mistakes" corrected and an engine with a TBO of 2400 hours.
Flybymike The "traumahawk" as you call it was from a flying instruction point of view the best GA trainer to come out of the USA in the last thirty years, unfortunatly it now suffers from product support issues due to the 13000 hour spar life. This issue alone deters companys from producing parts for the aircraft and so makes it unatractive for a high use operation.
Gyrotyro I think you should take notice of Bllink182 today I spent 2 hours in the hangar fixing aircraft and 6 hours pushing paper for this EASA part M. Not only is part M costing the customer lots of money but it is also taking the experienced engineers away from supervising and checking the quality of the work to push paper, the result is going to be that some companys are going to suffer a reduction of oversight on the hangar floor.
Oversteer Aircraft engines run most of the time at 65-75% of max power output, a car engine spends most of it's working life producing 25% of rated power, Aircraft engines also spend a lot of time doing nothing, this lack of use is a killer when it comes to corrosion and finaly when your 200,000 mile car engine fails with a big bang you get out and walk, if an aircraft engine fails your survival is just a roll of the dice!
Flybymike The "traumahawk" as you call it was from a flying instruction point of view the best GA trainer to come out of the USA in the last thirty years, unfortunatly it now suffers from product support issues due to the 13000 hour spar life. This issue alone deters companys from producing parts for the aircraft and so makes it unatractive for a high use operation.
Gyrotyro I think you should take notice of Bllink182 today I spent 2 hours in the hangar fixing aircraft and 6 hours pushing paper for this EASA part M. Not only is part M costing the customer lots of money but it is also taking the experienced engineers away from supervising and checking the quality of the work to push paper, the result is going to be that some companys are going to suffer a reduction of oversight on the hangar floor.
Oversteer Aircraft engines run most of the time at 65-75% of max power output, a car engine spends most of it's working life producing 25% of rated power, Aircraft engines also spend a lot of time doing nothing, this lack of use is a killer when it comes to corrosion and finaly when your 200,000 mile car engine fails with a big bang you get out and walk, if an aircraft engine fails your survival is just a roll of the dice!