Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

SR20 Diesel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Mar 2010, 11:29
  #21 (permalink)  
TWR
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Belgium
Age: 46
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is what Delta Hawk did, although on a small scale. They fitted two privately-owned SR20s with the firewall-forward kit and they are now used as the testbed.
TWR is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 14:20
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Privately owned is not good enough. They probably fly under 50hrs/year, and in the hands of (given the a/c type) not too dumb pilots who probably can spell e n g i n e m a n a g e m e n t

One needs to hand out a few to some flying schools, with financial incentives (like FOC maintenance and financial guarantees (penalty clauses i.e.) on the availability) to make sure they thrash them properly.

The Thielerts started to fall apart in the school fleets; private ones lasted a lot better.
IO540 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 14:32
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: EGTT
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm surprised that they can get away with only testing two engines on two aircraft. I guess they must to a lot of bench testing?

What are the requirements to get engine certification?
1800ed is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 14:40
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is the renter that has the propensity to break anything that could be broken so they are ultimately the best test bed. Moreover an aircraft is put through its paces in short thrift if it is going to earn its keep. You should watch the renters for example who cant be bothered to let the turbos on Thielerts cool, ramp up and immediately turn the engine off.

It is very easy to be lulled by new technology - I got as close as writing a cheque out for a new DA42 having canvassed all sorts of opinions. As it turns out I am very glad I didnt. I could easily be tempted with the Austro engined DA42 because I still believe it is a fine aircraft but every time I am I have only to remind myself that just as the Theilerts they need a few years to prove themselves with hard use by the schools. The trouble is I am not sure how many they are selling into the schools at the moment - probably not a lot. On the plus side at least the rest of the systems are now pretty well proven and the pitfalls are well known.
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 15:00
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are the requirements to get engine certification?
You would be suprised. Very suprised.

Theilerts they need a few years to prove themselves with hard use by the schools. The trouble is I am not sure how many they are selling into the schools at the moment - probably not a lot.
I think a school would be after an uptime contract with liquidated damages, to bend over the same barrel again

Anyway, their sales are very low now. I saw some figs the other day - about 30 in 2009.
On the plus side at least the rest of the systems are now pretty well proven and the pitfalls are well known.
Yes, it's a nice plane. Very classy.

They need to thicken the tin on the tinplate brackets a little... Attention to detail is very cheap... but most don't know how to do it. In my business, we pay say 20p for a moulding. Most people would stick a 5p label on it. We stick a high quality 40p label on it - it sets it apart in quality (and doesn't come off when the sun shines on it Diamond need to learn that.

Last edited by IO540; 9th Mar 2010 at 15:13.
IO540 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 16:19
  #26 (permalink)  
TWR
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Belgium
Age: 46
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not just the two Cirri that you have to take into consideration. That is important for the Cirrus STC.

They operate this engine now already for some time in the experimental/self-build class. OK, it is the 160 HP version but still.

I don't know the exact number of ACFT flying with a Delta Hawk already but I think it is save to say they already have a significant amount of experience...

I'm not an expert, but I sure would love to fly a SR20 up to FL180 + @ 1000 FPM. I couldn't even care if it was slower than a SR22...
TWR is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 16:41
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You should watch the renters for example who cant be bothered to let the turbos on Thielerts cool, ramp up and immediately turn the engine off.
Thielert does specify two minutes, so that's what I'm doing. But I've heard a contrary opinion (here, no less) from someone who heard somebody else doing testing on this, and who found out that the turbos are at their coolest right after landing (low power, high cooling airflow), and that they would *heat up* during the taxi-in and during the "ramp down".
BackPacker is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 17:12
  #28 (permalink)  
DBo
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know the exact number of ACFT flying with a Delta Hawk already but I think it is save to say they already have a significant amount of experience...

I don't think Deltahawk have a single customer engine flying.

Dave.

FWIW I have one of the six RV-9A's flying with a Wilksch diesel. I love it; 120 kts on 16 lts/hr.
DBo is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 17:45
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BackPacker
I've heard a contrary opinion (here, no less) from someone who heard somebody else doing testing on this, and who found out that the turbos are at their coolest right after landing
My understanding is that it's not a cooling issue, but rather one of lubrication. The turbo takes a long time to spin down from 50,000rpm, so it's best to keep the oil pressure up while it does so.
soay is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 18:07
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Soay - yep, that is what Diamond told me as well.
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 19:49
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"FWIW I have one of the six RV-9A's flying with a Wilksch diesel. I love it; 120 kts on 16 lts/hr."

Please tell us more I heard development on this engine had stopped
Mickey Kaye is online now  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 21:03
  #32 (permalink)  
DBo
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"FWIW I have one of the six RV-9A's flying with a Wilksch diesel. I love it; 120 kts on 16 lts/hr."

Please tell us more I heard development on this engine had stopped


The WAM-120 engine is still available but is not being actively marketed.

Development work is continuing on a "bored out" version with a revised combustion system which is likely to develop 140 hp. For certified aircraft Wilksch are hoping that the proposed ESA 1 and 2 standards will provide them with an entry route into the certified market.


Dave
DBo is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 22:06
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So even in this economic climate the government R & D grants are still avalable?
A and C is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 22:30
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spain or Thailand
Age: 51
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Delta Hawk looks great on paper, but again: not ONE engine delivered to the customers and this very same thread can be found here:

Deltahawkengines - VAF Forums

Funnily enough that thread was about deltahawks in 2005 and it seems that DH already promoted then to take downpayments and orders. Here is what they said in 2005:

"The DeltaHawk engine is in production with the first non certified 160HP engines available by May 2005, this first batch have all been sold.
The 200HP will be available by October 2005, however all production until December 2005 has been allocated to buyers.

Currently you will need to allow up to 6 months between a signed purchase agreement and the availability of the production engine.

We hope that within the next 12mths that the engine will obtain it's FAA certification."

Last edited by rokami93; 9th Mar 2010 at 22:49. Reason: improved link
rokami93 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2010, 21:12
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The futur is Diesel

Any 4 stroke Diesel Aero engine is bound to fail, either being to low a power density ie to heavy like the SMA and to many harmonics and complicated, the Theilert. In a 4 stroke 4cyl the prop drives the engine 30% of the time, very hard on the prop. 3 or more cyl externaly scavenged 2 stroke has no reverse torque, smaller torque pulses , makes a far better engine.

The Delta Hawk has been in developmet for 10 years and they are being sold to the US armed forces for UAVs and Deltahawk has had one in the back of a Rutan Long Easy for years. It is well designed, no gear box or electronics and the 200hp is the same weight as a 200hp Lycoming IO360.

The German Zoche 8 cyl 2 stroke radial is the best at the 300hp (equivalent to a 16cyl 4 stroke) is the same weight as the IO360, but I think it's a scam to get EU development grants.

There are about 3, 4 strokes and 7, 2 strokes Aero Diesels in varying stages of development.

The other things to consider is fuel supply, Mogas does not have the quality control standards or the right specifications for serious aviation use and Avgas is difficult to find world wide and the US could ban it, plus the lead additive is only made by one UK company for the world, if they go bust, what then. So Avtur it has to be, which means Diesel.

The SR20 is a good example of what a diesel can do for performance. Range increase for the same fuel load or reduce fuel/weight for the same range, which increases the pay load. Better high altitude performance as well.
Infact the Diesel SR20 is better than both SR22 models, only just down on climb rate and max cruise, and they 22 was the best selling light aircraft last year.

So I think the Diesel SR20 will be the most modern aircraft flying once on the market.
horizon flyer is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 10:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I very much hope that the deltahawk engine meets the paper spec, for those who don't like plastic just look at what the delta hawk would do for the Robin DR400.

However I have yet to see one of these oil burners that is reliable to make it worth the trouble of taking out the Lycoming
A and C is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2010, 14:29
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spain or Thailand
Age: 51
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by horizon flyer
The Delta Hawk has been in developmet for 10 years and they are being sold to the US armed forces for UAVs and Deltahawk has had one in the back of a Rutan Long Easy for years.
The US armed forces use Thielert. THIELERT Aircraft Engines GmbH - News


Originally Posted by horizon flyer
There are about 3, 4 strokes and 7, 2 strokes Aero Diesels in varying stages of development.
I hope they will bring in fresh wind into the issue. Any links or further information available?

Originally Posted by horizon flyer
The SR20 is a good example of what a diesel can do for performance. Range increase for the same fuel load or reduce fuel/weight for the same range, which increases the pay load. Better high altitude performance as well.
Infact the Diesel SR20 is better than both SR22 models, only just down on climb rate and max cruise, and they 22 was the best selling light aircraft last year.
Not one flying as far as I am informed. Not even a single experimental conversion. For right now they need to prove that they can fly, then it will take years to show their reliability. From where did you get the performance data and information?
rokami93 is offline  
Old 8th May 2016, 14:33
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rokami93 they have one in a 172 plus a Rutan Veryeasy and in a SR20 that out performs the avgas SR20, so it is flying, just seems to be taking a long time to certify.

Note the Twin with the highest sales is the DA42 with diesel which are not Thielerts any more, Diamond makes them for it's self.
horizon flyer is offline  
Old 9th May 2016, 13:39
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Greater London Area
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, revitalizing a 6 year old post on Diesel engines, how the hell did you find that old stuff?
Fly4Business is offline  
Old 9th May 2016, 23:32
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fly4Business I think I googled it and it came up, was wondering how Delta Hawk was doing. I believe they are the best hope for replacing the bloody horrible Lycoming 360 which if you know anything about engineering is a mess.
horizon flyer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.