Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Lack of fuel 'caused plane crash'

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Lack of fuel 'caused plane crash'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Feb 2009, 13:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Wales
Age: 42
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lack of fuel 'caused plane crash'

An aerobatic plane crashed into a field on a training flight because of a lack of fuel, an investigation has found.



The pilot, John Paulson, 56, had to be helped from the wreckage by a farmer, but suffered only minor injuries in the crash landing at Llay, near Wrexham.

Mr Paulson told the Air Accident Investigations Branch (AAIB) he had misjudged how much fuel the plane had.

The AAIB report said the situation could have been "considerably more serious."

Mr Paulson had taken the plane out on 2 September 2008 to train for an aerobatic flight.

He told the AAIB that he had thought he had a full tank but after performing a number of stunts he realised it was almost empty.

After crash landing in the field, the plane flipped over on its back, trapping Mr Paulson.

He escaped from the wreckage after a farmer lifted a wing of the plane using a plough attachment on his tractor.

The AIIB reported concluded he could have suffered much worse injuries "had it not been for the soft earth and the timely intervention of the tractor driver".

BBC NEWS | Wales | North East Wales | Lack of fuel 'caused plane crash'
AlphaMale is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 14:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, a lack of fuel will certainly do it. So will improper contact with the ground.
Heliplane is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 18:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like his head was empty of common sense, too.
Oldpilot55 is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 01:21
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,620
Received 63 Likes on 44 Posts
Lack of fuel is much less that cause of an accident, as the dramatic reduction in choices of places to land safely, following the exhaustion of the fuel.
Pilot DAR is online now  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 07:16
  #5 (permalink)  
The Original Foot
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There for the grace of...

I went flying the other day, it was actually quite normal. I suspect if the AAIB had investigated, however, they could have concluded that I could have been badly injured had I not bothered to flare during the landing.

I guess if the ground had been harder it's possible he might have stayed the right way up, but I am unclear the value this adds to the day.

I hope the pilot is too badly injured.
bigfoot01 is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 08:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kent UK
Age: 70
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope the pilot is too badly injured.
Typo?
kevmusic is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 08:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the problem was fuel contamination.........












....Fuel got contaminated with air!!!
I do like his comment that he will check the fuel with a dipstick next time rather than eyeballing it!! I wonder if there will be a next time as he is flying around in a Robin rather than one of the worlds top aerobatic aircraft a CAP232.
Zulu Alpha is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 10:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
What will the insurance man say? Presume you don't have a fuel gauge?
N707ZS is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 10:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Age: 71
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He also says he is going to wear a parachute from now on. So next time he doesn't check the fuel before take off he can parachute to safety while the plane goes on to kill innocent people on the ground.

He concludes that "this type of aircraft is likely to pitch forward onto its back on any sort of surface".
DavidHoul52 is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 11:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hunched over a keyboard
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least there was no fire risk!
moggiee is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 12:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fire

Not sure about that,aren't empty or nearly empty fuel tanks more likely to explode due to containing enough oxygen to permit this?
Lister
Lister Noble is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 12:26
  #12 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,620
Received 63 Likes on 44 Posts
Looks to me that a post evacuation fire would have saved a day's cleaning up!
Pilot DAR is online now  
Old 15th Feb 2009, 08:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cardiff, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 1,214
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a bad transcript of the AAIB report by the BBC in this instance, but still better to comment on the original report in my view
Mariner9 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2009, 10:13
  #14 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I wouldn't bee too hard on the poor chap and I certainly wouldn't laugh at him like some of the t@ssers here. Yes, class 1 mistake, and everyone was lucky but there may be some mitigating factors.....

Often when doing aero's (depending on aircraft) one can't just fill the plane up to the top with fuel due to W&B and CofG restrictions so fuel planning is no doubt important ( in fact AAIB report confirms that wing tanks must be empty for aeros).

Secondly fuel gauges do not have to show how much fuel is onboard, but only have to show when empty. SOme are better than others at this. Our aeroplane shows no visible fuel when at below about 110 litres and the fuel gauges are rubbish. We rely on a tech log to show fuel burned and if in doubt top it up. This can be a pain in the @rse as it could put us over weight and a dipstick wouldn't work with the dihedral of the wings.

It is all very easy if you fly a PA28 with "tabs"....
englishal is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.