The rules for METAR coding in the UK (which do not include all reported elements that are possible) are published in CAP 746.
On the basis of these rules the METAR in question appears to be incorrect in that the RVR value should not have been included.
The relevant extracts from CAP 746 are:
Quote:
- The RVR group shall be reported in the METAR only when either the minimum visibility or the runway visual range is observed to be less than 1500 metres.
- 2000 metres should be regarded as the maximum value that is possible to report. If the actual value is greater than can be reported by the runway visual range equipment or human observed method, the maximum value shall be preceded by ‘P’.
|
However, the rules for reporting IRVR to aircraft by ATC are slightly different. CAP 493 (a.k.a. MATS Part 1) says:
Quote:
IRVR reporting to aircraft is started:
a) whenever the aerodrome meteorological report shows the visibility to be less than 1500 metres;
b) whenever the IRVR display is indicating an RVR value equal to or less than the maximum for that system;
c) whenever shallow fog is reported and during a period for which it is forecast.
|
So it looks like the METAR has been coded up using the rules for passing IRVR reports to aircraft by ATC.