PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10th January 2009, 12:47   #1 (permalink)
Pompey till I die
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Guildford
Age: 37
Posts: 578
What does this metar mean ?

EGLF 101220Z 25005KT 1600 R24/P1500 BCFG BR OVC002 M04/M04 Q1027

I've not seen R24/P1500 before ? Is it runway 24 visibility 1500m ? If so how is that different from RVR ? I looked at the glossary but can't see anything for it.
PompeyPaul is offline   Reply
Old 10th January 2009, 12:52   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Scotland
Posts: 362
R24 is an RVR figure for runway 24; the "P" stands for "increasing."

1600 is the Met Vis.

Met Visibility and RVRs are measured by seperate methods. The two are not expected to be equal.
Kiltie is offline   Reply
Old 10th January 2009, 13:44   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hither and Thither
Posts: 287
P does not stand for increasing!!
It indicates the RVR is in excess of the maximum that can be read for a particular runway.
D (decreasing), U (increasing) not presently used in UK, but are in rest of Europe. There is also a code for staying the same (which I cannot recall at present).
Red Four is offline   Reply
Old 10th January 2009, 14:08   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: south of 56n
Posts: 575
P1500=Runway Visual range greater than 1500metres. The RVR is measured by a set of either visual lights or elecronically by a set of transmisometers set along the edge of the runway.......the aerodrome visibility may often be differant from the runway visibility. RVR's are usually also quoted for Touchdown, midpoint and stop end.
fisbangwollop is offline   Reply
Old 11th January 2009, 00:39   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 538
It means it's time for numbnuts to stay on the ground and drink tea.
TheGorrilla is offline   Reply
Old 11th January 2009, 00:49   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 653
Often abbreviated as NNSOGADT
flybymike is offline   Reply
Old 11th January 2009, 00:51   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 538
So that explains something else on the METARS and TAFs.

P.s. If I were being picky I'd say transmissometers has 4 Ss in it.

P.p.s. PS on a METAR = Pea Soup??
TheGorrilla is offline   Reply
Old 11th January 2009, 02:51   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 32
Posts: 2,666
or simply PS = Pretty Sh*tty.
Say again s l o w l y is online now   Reply
Old 6th February 2009, 01:49   #9 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, WA
Age: 71
Posts: 5
Metar means we lost our old airways code which was just like a favorite pair of slippers. I know, we were probably the only country out of step but I still miss it.
olderndirt is offline   Reply
Old 7th February 2009, 10:31   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: one dot low as usual
Age: 52
Posts: 528
As R4 says, it means greater than 1500m. That is the upper range of most transmissometers used so it just means that they are using them as well as tower visibility (1600m in this example) to back up the vis report.
Fright Level is offline   Reply
Old 8th February 2009, 15:38   #11 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1
RVR is given only when horizontal visibility (or RVR itself) is less then 1500m. If RVR is more than this 1500m. a P is added in front. Here R24/P1500.

When letters are shown after this it indicates a trend over a period of 10 mins, as correctly said by Red Four.

"There is also a code for staying the same (which I cannot recall at present)."

It is then P1500N
FDR man is offline   Reply
Old 12th February 2009, 12:05   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: www.hgfc.co.uk
Posts: 925
Surely there's no need to include the RVR in this METAR?

For one, at 1600m met vis then there are unlikely to be many instrument approach restrictions and second an RVR which is LOWER than the met vis (because the RVR can't read greater than 1500m) is about as useful as the proverbial chocolate teapot.

By the way, I did see chocolate teapots for sale in a sweet shop in Le Touquet a couple of years ago - I have a picture somewhere.
moggiee is offline   Reply
Old 12th February 2009, 14:24   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: 2nm downwind of Tayto Castle
Age: 45
Posts: 542
Quote:
...at 1600m met vis then there are unlikely to be many instrument approach restrictions ...
In this case the METAR also states BCFG (fog patches) - and it's RVRs that we use for approach minima - sod's law says that the fog patch will be just where you don't want it - at the RVR transmissometer
Floppy Link is offline   Reply
Old 12th February 2009, 14:41   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,052
The rules for METAR coding in the UK (which do not include all reported elements that are possible) are published in CAP 746.

On the basis of these rules the METAR in question appears to be incorrect in that the RVR value should not have been included.

The relevant extracts from CAP 746 are:
Quote:
  • The RVR group shall be reported in the METAR only when either the minimum visibility or the runway visual range is observed to be less than 1500 metres.
  • 2000 metres should be regarded as the maximum value that is possible to report. If the actual value is greater than can be reported by the runway visual range equipment or human observed method, the maximum value shall be preceded by ‘P’.
However, the rules for reporting IRVR to aircraft by ATC are slightly different. CAP 493 (a.k.a. MATS Part 1) says:
Quote:
IRVR reporting to aircraft is started:
a) whenever the aerodrome meteorological report shows the visibility to be less than 1500 metres;
b) whenever the IRVR display is indicating an RVR value equal to or less than the maximum for that system;
c) whenever shallow fog is reported and during a period for which it is forecast.
So it looks like the METAR has been coded up using the rules for passing IRVR reports to aircraft by ATC.
Spitoon is online now   Reply
Reply
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2010 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".