PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22nd July 2008, 18:19   #1 (permalink)
Roger10-4
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 118
Flying Without a CofA

Say you run a group syndicate for a small aircarft and one of the members unknowingly uses it when the CofA had expired. Do you have any responsibilty or are you expected to report it etc?

Thanks

Roger10-4 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 19:39   #2 (permalink)
jxk
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cilboldentune, Britannia
Posts: 147
I think your maintenance organisation is supposed to report to the CAA if they find out. In my experience must MOs wouldn't unless you're a persistent offender and a bad payer.
jxk is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 19:48   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: england
Posts: 461
I think the CAA would look upon it as a pilot responsibility. If you had told the pilot it would be OK, then things could get interesting. Alternatively, assuming you are not very happy about your 'mate' flying the aircraft, there's nothing stopping you reporting it to the CAA but I'm guessing they would look at the whole operation with a very fine comb; have you any skeletons to hide?

All that aside, your co-owner also flew the aircraft without valid insurance - consider that when the aircraft gets bent.
Lurking123 is online now   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 19:54   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Northants
Age: 39
Posts: 3,420
Come on people what are you the police?

Quote:
one of the members unknowingly uses it when the CofA had expired.

Anyone can make a mistake, it is not a big thing just a cautionary tale for education purposes. If it was knowingly used then it is different kettle of fish.

Go on ask me how many people come to me for licence revalidation's without realising the licence has expired and they have been flying.......
bose-x is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 19:55   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 118
He's not someone I see often but I didn't really want to get involved in it. His excuse was "How do I know unless someone tells me?" despite copies of all the documents being in the aircraft. No skeletons but can't be bothered with the hassle. If the engineers report it that s their decision at least. Thanks for your responses.
Roger10-4 is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 20:15   #6 (permalink)
A Personal Title
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: England
Posts: 7,598
In this case (flight in genuine ignorance of a duff CofA) means no insurance, definitely.

Unless it is stolen in which case you are covered!
IO540 is online now   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 20:19   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Northants
Age: 39
Posts: 3,420
Quote:
In this case (flight in genuine ignorance of a duff CofA) means no insurance, definitely.
Come on........

Quote:
one of the members unknowingly uses it when the CofA had expired.
A mistake is a mistake. Sometimes you people amaze. I am so glad I am surrounded by perfect people who never make a mistake which allows them to sit and pontificate on the mistakes of others.
bose-x is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 20:25   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: england
Posts: 461
bose, of course you pragmatic approach is what most/all of us would do. However, I'm not sure the insurance company would see things the same way.
Lurking123 is online now   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 20:26   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England
Posts: 244
I seem to post the same thing many times; can anyone give an example of an insurer avoiding payout due to excessive crosswind, w&b outside limits, c of a unwittingly expired, or other technicalities?

Conversely, almost every accident seems to involve somebody making a mistake; as far as I know a payout has always been made.
cjboy is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 20:28   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Northants
Age: 39
Posts: 3,420
Exactly my point CJBOY.

The fact is we are talking about something that has happened. No harm no foul and hopefully the person in question will be a bit more careful to check the paperwork in future. A learning experience,, nothing more.

Utter bollox talking about reporting people. Like I said I am glad those pontificating are perfect and thus will never make a mistake.....
bose-x is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 20:34   #11 (permalink)
A Personal Title
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: England
Posts: 7,598
Quote:
I seem to post the same thing many times; can anyone give an example of an insurer avoiding payout due to excessive crosswind, w&b outside limits, c of a unwittingly expired, or other technicalities?
Cjboy - you are correct. The things you list are just pilot negligence, and negligence is covered. As would be something crazy like a VFR departure into OVC002 - perfectly legal because you don't have to be 500ft clear while departing, and afterwards you don't need to be 500ft clear if the ground is devoid of people building etc.

However, the insurer will not pay out if the CofA is void, and I have this from a Haywards loss adjuster I spoke to face to face. Similarly, the pilot licenses need to be valid. The loss adjuster checks these papers.

Now, onto practical details. If the CofA has lapsed by date, that is clear. If it has not lapsed, but has been voided by some technicality (like somebody fitted a washer which did not come with a certificate of conformity ) he will never discover it. They don't look that closely.
IO540 is online now   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 20:35   #12 (permalink)

I'd rather be floating

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England
Posts: 1,404
Quote:
unknowingly uses it when the CofA had expired
How is this possible?

(1) The aircraft documentation wasn't properly maintained because somebody couldn't be bothered with the paperwork?
(2) The aircraft documentation was properly maintained but the pilot couldn't be bothered to check it before flight?

Seems to me that in case (1) whoever the syndicate rules say was in charge is at fault, and in case (2) the pilot is at fault. Unless, the syndicate rules for checking paperwork before each flight don't tell the pilot where to look, so again it's down to the person to whom the syndicate delgates criminal responsibility for keeping the paperwork straight. Or, if the syndicate has no paperwork at all, it's everybody's fault, because every pilot should know that such things need to be controlled.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 20:41   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 37
Posts: 76
If you walk out of woolworths and forget to pay for something you go back and amend for you error. You don't go to the police station.
Mickey Kaye is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 21:13   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Article 52(c):

The commander of an aircraft shall take all reasonable steps to satisfy himself before the aircraft takes off.....that the aircraft is in every way fit for the intended flight, and that where a certificate of maintenance review is required by article 14(1) to be in force, it is in force and will not cease to be in force during the intended flight

So it's the commanders responsibility. However, if it could be proven that you as the person 'running' the syndicate implied that the aircraft was airworthy you could well expect to be held partially responsible.

In reality neither will happen if you are honest and open about it and take steps to resolve the problem.
JBGA is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 21:26   #15 (permalink)

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Still wandering in hyperspace.
Posts: 4,627
Theoretically the pilot who flew it should report himself to the CAA because he breached the ANO. However, I pass no judgement on him; it has already been pointed out that anyone can make a mistake once.
ShyTorque is online now   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 21:36   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 435
I find these sort of threads pretty disturbing.

Is this an innocent 'we made a mistake should we own up' or is it a 'should I shop him?'

Or should it be 'how can it be possible for a group member to fly the aircraft if the C of A has expired?

My feeling is that it is the latter but probably with undercurrents of the former.

Sort out the situation which has resulted in this state of affairs - because it threatens everyone in the syndicate. You do not need a forum thread to establish that!
gasax is offline   Reply
Old 22nd July 2008, 21:58   #17 (permalink)

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Still wandering in hyperspace.
Posts: 4,627
Well said, Gasax.

A lesson has hopefully been learned by the individual concerned. Perhaps a better system can be put in place, for the benefit of all members of the syndicate to ensure it doesn't happen again? Which is probably what the CAA would say in a cautionary letter if it were reported.
ShyTorque is online now   Reply
Old 23rd July 2008, 00:18   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Daventry
Posts: 256
Placard

Surely a tiny placard on the IP with 'c of a expiry,insurance expiry,next annual due etc wouldn't be too difficult to organise on a group a/c.
Never seen one in any of our club rentals but there is an enormous whiteboard in the briefing room with all this stuff on it.
MM
modelman is offline   Reply
Old 23rd July 2008, 00:55   #19 (permalink)
robin
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South of England
Posts: 734
On our aircraft, there is the flight log with the date of the next 50 hour/6month check and the date of the expiry of the CofA

Members of the group are supposed to check this before flight. If I find they have flown the wrong side of these dates, forget the CAA or insurance company - their dangly bits will be decorating the christmas tree....

robin is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd July 2008, 01:24   #20 (permalink)

Chaplain
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Essex and Norfolk
Age: 65
Posts: 2,294
Like robin's, our aircraft has a "tech log" with the expiry date, next-check tacho reading, etc clearly written at the top of the page. If P1 does a proper Check-A and writes it in the tech log before flight, he's writing on the page with the info on it.

The C of A, C of MR, and all the other documents are in a "docs folder" in the back of P1's seat.

It would be hard to go flying without knowing the C of A was invalid, unless you'd decided beforehand to do so.

But some folks will fly first, write up afterwards.
Keef is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EASA Standard CofA 2close Private Flying 12 23rd October 2008 11:23
PPL training with a private CofA Philpaz Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) 2 2nd June 2008 22:29
EASA STANDARD COFA bvgs Rotorheads 4 18th May 2006 21:05
Quick CofA question Charley Engineers & Technicians 2 27th April 2006 11:43
Self-Builds and CofA restrictions italianjon Private Flying 15 20th April 2005 14:46


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".