PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 7th Jul 2005, 21:42   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: cambridge
Posts: 110
Germany vfr not below 200ft agl ?

Jepp vfr charts carry a note suggesting Germany requires cross country vfr flights to be min 2000agl.

But if all their airspace except G has vmc minima of 300m below cloud, then it would appear that nobody flies legally XC in that country unless the cloud base is at least 3000ft.

Given typical N European Wx, not much flying going on there then, or I have missed something?
windy1 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2005, 22:10   #2 (permalink)
DubTrub
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Nothing wrong with being
Quote:
not below 200ft agl ?
I would personally fly higher, so as to comply with the "not below 500ft" rule.
 
Old 7th Jul 2005, 22:43   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: cambridge
Posts: 110
windy1

re my earlier post - sorry for typo - should have read 2000ft
windy1 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2005, 06:22   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North
Posts: 78
I'd read the German AIP, not some note on a Jepp chart. An unqualified mandatory 2000ft min level for VFR has to be nonsense, especially given the term "cross country" (what does it mean?).
justsomepilot is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2005, 07:20   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,992
Dub Trub

#1 One can be s&l at 200' and not break rule 5, very easy in parts of east anglia!

#2 Charts arrived yesterday, thanks!

Stik
stiknruda is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2005, 09:53   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London
Posts: 198
I asked a German pilot about the 2000ft rule when I was in Germany last year and he told me he had never heard of it.
Aim Far is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2005, 10:08   #7 (permalink)
DubTrub
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Stik, me old mate, I think the UK is the only country to have filed a difference to the ICAO definition of "not below 500' except over sparsely-populated areas or water".
So over the majority of Europe, one shall fly at a height greater than 500' above the ground.
 
Old 8th Jul 2005, 10:26   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: TQ307812
Posts: 1,222
If in doubt, RTFM

The German AIP ENR 1.6 is the origin of this particular comment on the Jepp maps. I've reproduced it here in full with the relevant bits emboldened. Basically, you should be at or about 2000 feet, but airspace constraints are one of a number of reasons that may reasonably force you lower.



The text in full:

"(1) Aircraft shall not be flown below the minimum safe height except when necessary for take-off and landing. Minimum safe height is the height at which neither an unnecessary noise disturbance in the sense of § 1 para (2) nor unnecessary hazard to persons and property in the event of an emergency landing are to be feared; however, over cities, other densely populated areas, and assemblies of persons this height shall be at least 300 m (1000 ft) above the highest obstacle within a radius of 600 m, and elsewhere at least 150 m (500 ft) above ground or water. Gliders, hang-gliders and paragliders may be operated below a height of 150 m if necessary for the kind of operation and if danger to persons and property is not to be feared.

(2) Aircraft shall not be flown below bridges and similar constructions nor below overhead lines and antennas.

(3) Cross-country flights according to VFR with power-driven aircraft shall be conducted at least 600 m (2000 ft) above ground or water, unless, for safety reasons according to para (1) sentence 2, a higher level has to be maintained. Cross-country flights below 600 m (2000 ft) above ground or water taking into consideration the regulations under para (1) and (2) may be commenced and conducted, if the adherence to other rules and regulations according to the „Luftverkehrs-Ordnung“, in particular the adherence to the airspace structure according to § 10, the VFR rules according to § 28 or the ATC clearances, require a lower level.

(4) For flights conducted for special purposes, the local competent Aeronautical Authority of the Land may grant exceptions.

(5) For flights in accordance with Instrument Flight Rules, § 36 applies.

(6) Para (3) does not apply to military low level flights and flights including missions of the Federal Border Police, the civil defence and disaster control, and the police forces of the Lands. "


2D
2Donkeys is offline  
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Closed Thread
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 18:15.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".