Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Emirates flight EK 1 DXB - LHR

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Emirates flight EK 1 DXB - LHR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 19:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dorset
Age: 71
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Emirates flight EK 1 DXB - LHR

I met a couple friends at Heathrow this morning who had travelled on this flight. I tracked it on Flightstats to check it was going to be on time (which it was) and noticed that while flying north-westwards over Iraq it turned around over the Thermal Lake northwest of Baghdad, flew south-eastwards quite a long way towards the southwest of Baghdad, and then turned again to continue its journey along the flight path it had just taken.

My friends were unaware of this manoeuvure as they were asleep at the time.

I was wondering what was the reason for this. I also saw from the flight log that the speed reduced considerably, from 640 kts to 440 kts in a matter of minutes. The altitude, however, remained the same at 38000 feet.
timgill is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 19:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Any track that, like this one, shows instantaneous 90° turns is deeply suspect. It's also very unlikely that the groundspeed reached 640 kts at any stage during the flight.

I suspect the reason that your friends didn't notice those wild manoeuvres is that they didn't happen.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 19:53
  #3 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
timgill If you look up information (and threads in PPRuNe) on the various tracking sites, you will understand that what is shown as a line or turn, is often just the computer making a guess. Over sparsely populated areas, there is not sufficient data to give accurate tracking and if the network 'sees' the aircraft 'jump' from one receiver to another with a larg gap between - then it may show this kind of 'track'. These sights are good OVERALL but their specifics of height/speed/heading are not to be taken literally.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 19:59
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dorset
Age: 71
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you both. That pretty well explains it!
timgill is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 22:52
  #5 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Glad to help. Sometimes, when there has been a crash, people are posting that 'FR24 shows the aircraft lost 5,000ft in two minutes and then climbed another 2,000 feet back up'. It ain't necessarily so!
PAXboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.