Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

A hole in the security cheese?

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

A hole in the security cheese?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th May 2016, 11:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A hole in the security cheese?

So, I took a flight as PAX yesterday from Belgrade to Frankfurt. Busy a/c all seats filled, usual shortage of overhead locker space.
Just as boarding was complete, and as our slot time passes there was something going on a few rows ahead. CC had called up a pax from the rear to look/talk with the pax in front. After some time they announced that the pax was ill and an ambulance had been called.
Said pax was removed and his hold luggage removed. The CC then set about looking for his carry-on, but only a few rows either side of where he had been sat. They asked only these few rows to identify their bags.
Now only a few minutes earlier people had been going right up and down the plane looking for stowage spots.
This strikes me as a hole in the system. A vector that could be exploited.
I did spend the rest of the flight a tad worried when i would hear the B of the Bang. It did seem a bit suspicious to fall sick just after boarding, but before the doors were closed.
Comments...

Last edited by hoss183; 10th May 2016 at 12:18.
hoss183 is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 11:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a full baggage carry-on recognition should be carried out, your OM should state that.
South Prince is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 11:34
  #3 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,138
Received 222 Likes on 65 Posts
I think you're right there, but let's not go giving the "baddies" ideas.
Herod is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 12:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,289
Received 167 Likes on 85 Posts
Carry-On baggage is screened!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 12:15
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes carry-on is screened. But if that's the ONLY line of defence, then the cheese is only 1 hole thick. Introduce a lazy or compromised screener and the hole appears.
As SP said, there should have been a cabin wide recognition really.
hoss183 is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 13:21
  #6 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hoss183:

Yes carry-on is screened. But if that's the ONLY line of defence, then the cheese is only 1 hole thick. Introduce a lazy or compromised screener and the hole appears.
As SP said, there should have been a cabin wide recognition really.
If you want belts and suspenders in all aspects of airline security, I suggest a different mode of transportation for your peace of mind.
aterpster is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 13:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 30 Miles from the A1
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
But hold baggage is also screened, so if that has to come off then so should hand baggage, a confirmatory check being the only way to determine that it has been done.
2Planks is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 13:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Woodbridge, Suffolk
Age: 71
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PR 434 was a case where a bomb was left by a passenger who disembarked at an intermediate stop. More cheese would be welcome.
Methersgate is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 13:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: london
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding in the UK. If a pap leaves the flight on the ground at anytime for any reason the whole aircraft has to be disembarked and a "security sweep" of the cabin carried out regardless of any bags or not.
chips101 is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 14:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Napoule
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The actions taken by the crew in the OP's post are standard procedure and DFT approved in at least one very large European LoCo.

You'll never satisfy everyone so please can we just leave the info' trail alone now.
Binder is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 14:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Continental Europe
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The most comprehensive way would be for everyone to disembark, do a full security search, then reboard everyone... maybe 40 mins or so for short haul, an hour or so for long haul... Offloading someone for illness or scared of flying or drunk is fairly common to be honest so the current procedures seem fine in normal circumstances unless there is sufficient reason by the captain to do a full cabin search
boardingpass is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 16:42
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
".......an hour or so for long haul"

You ARE joking of course?
JW411 is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 18:43
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Continental Europe
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JW are you saying longer or quicker? I'm usually optimistic but say it takes 10 mins to organise busses or terminal holding area and ground staff, about 15 mins to disembark, 10 mins to security search, 25 mins to reboard (plus or minus 10 if you're re-checking boarding cards/passports or not). I'm sure in reality everything usually takes longer than hoped.
boardingpass is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 20:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In your dreams! - well over an hour for a short haul loco last week ...
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 10th May 2016, 20:38
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: kent, england
Posts: 594
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hoss183.
If you weren't happy, then why not get off?
fokker1000 is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 05:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hoss183

Mate, the "security cheese" as you describe it has more holes in it than a colander! There are countless ways to get "items" onboard aircraft.

You can thank your lucky stars that most "items" smuggled onto aircraft these days are in powder form and are for human consumption.

It really isn't that suspicious for people to "fall sick" just after boarding an aircraft, disembarking sick (or other reason) people is just another day at the office. Even in the Dash-8 I personally do it around every 3-6 months.

DIVOSH!
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 07:28
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 68
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shouldn't this be in JB?
ExXB is offline  
Old 11th May 2016, 13:02
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did spend the rest of the flight a tad worried when i would hear the B of the Bang. It did seem a bit suspicious to fall sick just after boarding, but before the doors were closed.
So you were so worried that you just sat there and said nothing. Good for you.
T250 is offline  
Old 12th May 2016, 10:08
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK 007 DXB-LHR last week. Emirates had to offload a passenger with some some medical condition - we were still at the gate, just before pushing back. It was a pretty full A380 and the Captain optimistically suggested a 30 minute delay - it was 1hr 45mins.
spiney is offline  
Old 13th May 2016, 07:57
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for moving the thread here. Its hardly a pax issue, it something that affects crew and the application of SOPs. The intention was to get feedback on that from crew and to make people think about this vector.
hoss183 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.